card

"Throw some satisfaction to the fools." Existing is just a phenomenon, without specific will. As Viktor E. Frankl said, the reason why Jewish people returned alive from concentration camps was their collaboration with the severe and brutal situation, but the monosemization that was caused by their will to survive is not appropriate. A life considered without worth must fall into the fall. "As one is falling," one may be rescued. Thus, because it is impossible to understand what "fall" is, he could be recognized as a life to be considered without worth. "Fall" is a noun, and it appears to be a kind of nominalization. Blood pond hell is extremely different from Avīci Hell. A common noun of "fall" is the last sacrifice to the fools.

（「馬鹿には餌をやっておけ」。生きるというのは現象であり、特定の意志を伴った行為では無い。V.E.フランクルの様に、ユダヤの人々を強制収容所から生還させたのは彼らが遭遇した過酷な状況とのコラボレーションであったという様な事を言う人も居るが、彼らの生きる意志がそれを為さしめたという一義化は妥当ではないだろう。生きる価値の無い人間は、堕落してゆくだけである。「堕落している」だけでは、救われない事も無い。その、「堕落」という事がどういう事であるか理解出来ないから、その様な人間には生きる価値が無いのだろう。「堕落」というのは名詞であり、それにまつわって一種の唯名である。血の池地獄と無間地獄では全く違う。「堕落」という一般名詞は、馬鹿に与える最後の餌である。）

4:45 PM 11/15/2025

Judgment is not enough to explain the true substance of each individual. For example, an exam mark is a fact of whether the answer is correct or not, and it can substantially identify the true nature of one, but, even if one is referred to as a genius with an IQ of 175, an average person with an IQ of 100, or an individual with an IQ of 25 and intellectual disability, by the way, these scores are not capable of explaining the true substance of each individual as if they identify no encounter for deviated self in a short span. Of course, the true substance of each individual means the velocity of change, existentially. Because of a change in a commitment to a fact according to chronological order, each fact intervenes in the true substance of each individual, and judgment means change itself at least here. A fact as judgment must be integrated to indicate the velocity of change. Paradoxically, a fact as judgment possesses a social attribute, as it had been.

（評定というのは、当該人物の内実を表すもの足り得ない。例えば試験の点数は解答の正否にまつわる事実でありある程度は当該人物の内実を表すだろうが、例えばIQ175の天才だとかIQ100の凡人だとかIQ25の知的障害だとか云われてもそれに拠って当該人物が当該現在からの短期にて逸脱した自己に遭遇する事は無くそれは当該人物の内実を表してはいない。当該人物の内実とは、つまるところ、変化の度合いである。当該事実が当該人物の内実に干渉するのは、時系列に拠って事実へのコミットメントが変化するからであり、評定とは変化そのものの事である。評定としての事実が変化の度合いを示すには、それがインテグレートされねばならない。逆説的に、それに拠って、評定としての事実が社会的属性を帯びる。）

8:46 AM 11/13/2025

It is sometimes necessary for human life to accept negative emotions represented mainly by hatred, I think. As the difference between strategy and tactics must be recognized, there must be no ignorance of tactics, which is the ability to survive reality in front of oneself with situational handling. Concerned with negative emotions, it can be identified as the problem of situational handling. Mental stress must be maintained as both friend and foe, and the disposal of emotional negativity, as texturized, must not be related to the solution of a problem. Of course, hedonism as an outgrowth is not meant to be the way to a social solution, even though gratification contributes to solving a problem. Russian President Putin is not only a strategist but also a tactician, and recent Russia should be emphasized, as long as it is dependent on tactical governance against Ukraine. The optimal solution in human relationships or external relations is "Never allow your adversary to recognize you, as such.", but it is the world of intelligence, and an outgrowth of it is just the battlefield in the other land.

（私は、人が生きていく上で、憎悪に代表される負の感情というものも場合に拠り必要だと考えている。戦略と戦術の違いという事で鑑みても、目の前の現実を場裁きで生き延びる為の技量たる戦術というものを無視する事は出来ない。それは、負の感情についての場裁きの問題として見做され得る。ストレスは味方にも敵にも為るという事であり、負の感情の処理自体が問題解決と結び付けられるべきでは無い。つまり、快楽が問題解決に貢献しても、快楽の副産物が特には社会的な問題の解決に貢献する事は無い。プーチン露大統領は戦略家と云うよりは戦術家だが、現在のロシアは戦術国家としての側面が特には対ウクライナという事で強い。対人関係もしくは対外関係における最適解は「敵に敵とは見做させない」だが、それは諜報の世界であり、それの副産物が彼の地における戦場である。）

1:51 PM 11/8/2025




It is necessary to make children learn what fighting against is to resolve the issue of bullying. It is working well for scoundrels to victimize outsiders as the texturized third party being instrumentalized by systemic exploitation. Here, whether nominalized "scoundrels" are mutual killings as well as factions inside their collective or not is out of order. This texturization admires their independence and contributes to giving opportunities to attack outsiders. It is not necessary to recognize them as collective enough to be given opportunities to reintegrate into society. They are public enemies and have to be eliminated. The battlefield is to be invited. Left-wing bastards are to be afraid of this. As left-wing socialists, they are possessed by the delusion, which anticipates society enough to be recognized without war as being texturized, and they try to educate children with the ideal of exploiting people. The battlefield is to be invited. As it is repeated, they are public enemies, and a child must be independent from assessment with public enemies for the child's future. Taking advantage of generosity is to be nothing but venom, and children are to learn that ethical code of living from adults. It is prohibited to bring the egoism of an educator into the sight of education. Left-wing people are scarcely predicting a situation worse than death. They are to be called left-wing. It is easy to understand with the idea of the biological habitat of human females. It shows social distinction among humans, not adopting the classification between human males and human females, at least. This is the reason why bullying exists, as phenomenal, and there must be recognition of the battlefield in particular. Jewish pan-societal nature must not be defied. The concept that determines the liquidity of currency as being universally shared among all people is obviously an effective way to avoid war. However, Jewish people were not acknowledged by what scoundrels had been. Adolf Hitler had known it. Incredibly, Jewish people defended those scoundrels.

The fundamental principle of interrupting another's action sometimes appears not as a reservation of canceling the action but as a cancellation of reserving the action. For example, when there is the order "Turn off the television.", the conversation "Why don't you keep up with watching the television?" is overcoming the conversation "Don't disturb." The former stands for communication with another, but the latter is just a fucking or raping, against another. The denial of another's action as proactive or agentive without explaining the reason why being proactive or agentive for that action must be denied is described as the fundamental principle of action of a racist. For example, the denial of the existence of a wasted ballot in a vote is explained in the same way. For example, the perspective, which recognizes an equivalent value among everyone through currency, is explained in the same way. As they know, if it is better than worse, there is a labeling of anti-social personality against each of them. They must be sent to jail with a reason why social anticipation recognizes, but, as if it is none of their business for that labeling, they encounter the tragedy to accept the dead end by a psychiatric hospital as a concentration camp. It is appointed to identify them as gatekeepers and worshippers of far-left ideology, as they are paying no attention to the fact, for example, recognizing worse than the Nazis.

（他者の行動を阻止しようとする者の行動原理として、当該行動のキャンセルを予約するのではなく、当該行動の予約をキャンセルするというものが在る。例えば、「テレビを消せ」の指令において、「迷惑だから消してくれ」ではなく、「貴方は其処でずっとテレビを見てるの？」で為す場合である。前者においては其処にコミュニケーションが成立しているが、後者は他者に対する単なる辱めである。他者の行動を、それを意図する能動が否定される理由が説明される事無しに、その能動ごと否定するのは、人種差別主義者の行動原理として説明される。例えば、選挙における死票の存在を否定するという行動も、これと同じ行動原理に拠って説明される。また、例えば、全ての人においてカレンシーの価値が同じであるという見解を抱くという行動も、これと同じ行動原理に拠って説明される。別に、彼らが、反社会的人間として、自己に対するラベリングを認めているのならば良い。社会的諸事情上行き着く先は刑務所だろうが、それを認めなくとも精神病患者収容施設へ辿り着くという惨事が待っているだけである。彼らは、概ね極左イデオロギーの保持者且つ信奉者であり、事実すらも無視する事甚だしく、ナチスに対しても劣る。）

2:54 PM 11/6/2025




Along with a human male referred to as a biological weapon, a human female should be called a personality weapon, beyond description. A personality weapon is the method of fighting against, by socially weakened individuals, due to social texturizations of their selves as well. They are going to beguile others as much as possible in each role. The biological specification of each personality weapon does not necessarily have a duty to explain its suggestive obligation as phenomenal. As it is, enemies are just attacking in. If enemies are attacking, they are doing so, and if they cease their action, they are ceasing their activity. Unfortunately, there is no existential guarantee against the enemies' attacks. Relying on the principle of texturization, enemies are replacing (the fact of) their attacks with the victimization of someone as the shape of "factualization of it."

（ヒトのオスを生物兵器と呼ぶならば、ヒトのメスを人格兵器と呼ぶ、そういった形容が可能だろう。後者は、社会的に弱い者達の戦い方である。彼らは、自己を社会的にテキスト化し、「その」役割分担の下、ひたすら相手を誑かしに掛ける。当該人格兵器の生物学的スペックが、現象としてのその提示内容通りであるとは限らない。基本的に敵は攻撃しかして来ないが、彼らが攻撃して来るのだったら攻撃して来るし攻撃の手が止んでいるのだったら止んでいるという事である。敵の攻撃が敵の「提示通り」である保証など何処にも無い。敵は、テキスト化の原理に基づいて、敵に拠る攻撃の事実を被攻撃者における被害とそれの事実化という形ですり替えるのである。）

It is appropriate to acknowledge how to utilize generative artificial intelligence, as a utilizer is capable of receiving a good response from a usage of inquiry or inserting a simplified question. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and I often insert my composition or exposition into GAI, but there is no guarantee enough to recognize an appropriate response from GAI according to my composition or exposition. My method of thinking is fundamentally that of right-wing. GAI is particularly programmed, and it is available for the people specialized by the left-wing education in general. The reference to essential human rights by GAI, which OpenAI's Sam Altman mentioned, paradoxically indicates the assignment of programs, which manage to come up with an answer that circulates back fundamental human rights of a utilizer against a utilizer itself. For a utilizer, it is necessary to learn GAI's existentiality as well as realism and a utilizer's existentiality as well as nominalism. What a mistake of the conceivable way of recognizing a perfect thing as GAI innovated as infrastructure at present, at least.

（生成人工知能の使い方として、調べ物における使用や簡略化された質問文の挿入等に対するレスポンスとしての良い反応を得るという事は、理に適っているだろう。私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）が行っている様に、作文や論述の類をそのまま挿入するという事を行っても、まともな解答が返って来るとは限らない。私のものの考え方は、基本的に右派的である。生成人工知能は、そのプログラミング上、一般的な左翼教育に特化された人々に適した回答を出す。米OpenAIのサム・アルトマン氏が人工知能の基本的人権派生について言及しているのは、逆説的に、それは使用者の基本的人権を使用者に対して還流させる様な内容の回答を捻出するプログラムを課されている事を示している。其処では、人工知能が実在論に根差す存在であるのに対して、使用者は唯名論に根差す存在であるという事を、使用者はまず学ばねばならない。少なくとも現行でインフラとしてイノベートされている生成人工知能が万能であると思ったら、大間違いである。）

9:05 PM 11/5/2025

Totalitarianism rapes everything. As it is not referred to as a particular ideology, the mode of phenomenal existentiality of people is to be speculated upon the subject. Nihilism in the Nazis is not a specific political ideology, but the definition of the existentiality of people with blood and intrigue. To salvage it, it was necessary to victimize people by enclosure, as long as it was the texturization of their existentiality. "Because of the extermination, there is the victimization.", or "Because of the victimization, there is the extermination.", is not applied to the problem. Of course, the latter is the answer. The accountability of the victimization recognizes the former as the answer. They are blind to recognize the violence of the texturization. Being out of order, they benefit their enemy and harm their ally. Still, they are to be affirmative theorists of themselves, as phenomenal. It is said that war must not be taken. The present Israeli affirmation acknowledges it, and they are fighting against their enemy in the war. U.S. President Trump is on a roll like Adolf Hitler, and the U.S. and Israel are in a confluence at this time. Their enemy is the objectification of crime and punishment, and their enemy is embodied as well. Terrorism is equal to a terrorist there, and both terrorism and a terrorist are dependent on semantic unification.

（全体主義というのは、何もかもをも犯し辱める。ここで云うそれは、特定のイデオロギーの事では無く、現象的な人々の在り様の様式の事である。ナチスにおける虚無主義は、特定の政治的イデオロギーではなく、血と謀略にまつわる人の在り方の定義である。それが為されるには、特定の人々がテキスト化された被害者として存在する必要が在った。「排斥が故に被害者」なのか「被害者が故に排斥」なのか、答えは勿論後者である。被害の当事者達は、これを前者だと思い込んでいる。彼らには、テキスト化の暴力が見えない。彼らは、それを、逸脱的に否定する事に拠って、彼ら自身の味方を叩き敵を利している。只、彼らが自体的にそれの肯定論者と為ってしまっている。戦争よりはマシだと云って。現在のイスラエルはそれを知っており、彼らの敵と戦争をしている。トランプ米大統領はヒトラー役であり、今回イスラエルはそのアメリカと組んで、彼らの敵と戦っている。彼らの敵においては、罪と罰の具象化が為されており、その具現体として彼らは存在する。其処では、テロリズムとテロリストは同値であり、それは一義化されている。）

2:55 PM 11/1/2025




For the particular people, the world is like a courtroom or a military. If so, at least for them, it is not necessary to recognize the existentiality of a court or a military in society as reality. They texturize the world, as if the creatures of the ruling class in the old-fashioned socialist state. Because they are living in a society like that old-fashioned socialist state, they are not capable of being associated with "the" others. They are the texturized collective themselves and are good at associating with themselves inherently. Having people manage society and sustain its development and technological innovation, the world recognizes just two kinds of people as biological. It does not explain distinguishment human males and human females necessarily.

It is not necessary to salvage those who have abandoned existential integrity. Paradoxically, it is proving a degeneration of the self in general, and it does not contribute to the redemption of the other. Thus, what is degeneracy? Of course, it is something to be acknowledged the hard way. In that sense, degenerated people are sometimes to be salvaged "passively." For example, when a human female hopes for a particular kind of sex reassignment surgery as if a woman can not get along with redemption, she would lose her pride and the conceptualized existentiality as well. That "activeness" indicates vulnerability in a woman. It must be applied to a man who commits "a particular kind of sex reassignment surgery." As long as it can be a kind of characteristic of realism, how is "a Joker of laughing potato" telling a lie?

（堕落している人々を能動的に救おうとする必要は無い。逆説的に、それは自己の堕落の証左であるどころか、当該他者に対する救済にも為らない。堕落とは何か？そもそも、それは、身をもってして知るしか無いところのものである。その意味で、堕落している人々が、「受動的に」救われるという事は有るだろう。例えば、女性は救われないからと云って、性転換を志すヒトのメスが、何らかの手段でそれを為した時点で、当該人物は女性としての存在意義は当然としてそのプライドも理念も失うだろう。その「能動性」は、女性の弱さを示している。それは男性が性転換にコミットする場合でも同じである。「笑芋のピエロ」が、その実在論性でもってして、何を示しているか？）

8:16 AM 10/31/2025

Absorbing the reason why China's economic slowdown appears, some Japanese media defy the Chinese national profile at least for now. Of course, China is a totalitarian and socialist state. There is no foundation for the Chinese people to primarily stand for their nation with any economic analysis or economic indicator. There is an exact difference between the balance of national interests of China and those of Japan as conceptualized. The domination by the Chinese Communist Party is necessitated and purposefully generalized for them. If not, there is no reason why the existence of Chinese dignity should be carried out for them. At least for East Asian people, the former is suitable or appropriate as an outline of the nation. However, the Japanese conceptualize being an ally of the U.S. as a partner of Westernized countries. That hope is nominalized with the Japanese, for better or worse.

（中国の経済停滞を理由に少なくとも現行での同国の国家概を否定する一部の日本のマスコミの様な連中も存在する。中国は全体主義国家且つ社会主義国家である。其処では、経済学に拠る何らかの解析結果や経済指標が第一義的に国家の存立の礎と為るという事は無い。中国にとっての国家の利益や損益というのは、現在の我々日本における場合のそれとは概念的に全く別物である。中国共産党の君臨は、彼らにとって必要概であり目的概化されている。そうでなければ、少なくとも彼らにとって、何の為に国家中国が存在するのか訳が分からないだろう。少なくとも我々東洋人の場合、国家の概略として適しているもしくは優れているのは前者なのだろう。只、我々日本の場合、西側の一員としてアメリカの後ろ盾の下、それは為されない。それを望んだのは、良くも悪くも、我々日本人である。）

3:11 PM 10/29/2025




Shigeru Ishiba, the former Japanese Prime Minister, criticized the initiative by Norikazu Suzuki, Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Ishiba said, "The Minister is not going to bring down the rice price.", and "That way should not be initialized as an outline of the nation." What an odd recognition of being "strange as an outline of the nation," with appreciation to weaken national strength. If Japanese rice is a prestige good that reflects Japanese state capacity or global influence, the Japanese nation must directly manage its agriculture. Imported rice, which is not expensive and highly qualified, is coming into. It is necessary to be incentivized to compete with a severe external environment for Japanese rice, including the coming reality of imported rice. The method of the "rice ticket" facilitates this way. Consumers do not demand something with no necessity, by the way.

Petrification is redification. The people called "Red" manifest just the victimization of the Red Purge. They curse to be a reflection of themselves as long as it is necessary to juxtapose Red and others. Needless to say, as they were going to transform the existentiality of all the people as human resources, from capital-intensive to labor-intensive, a pan-social universal principle was obliged to lay down as it then. They tried to particularly reeducate people with a kind of social system, a code of conduct, a concrete reflection of the rule of law, drugs that include medicines, foods, psychological manipulation, and so on. It is called hell. As if a catastrophe caused by two atomic bombs symbolizing Avici Hell was maybe forgettable, people in Japan have additionally phenomenalized it. It is true after WWⅡ.

（石化は赤化。アカと呼ばれる人々は、どうやらそれに耐えられないらしい。彼らは、自己と他者を比較した上での、自己の赤色具合をひたすら呪う。其処で、彼らは、全ての人々を人的資本として資本集約的なものから労働集約的なものへと変換し、それを汎社会的な普遍原理として強制的に敷いた。一部の社会的制度、行動規範、具体的法規事項、医薬品も含めた薬物、食物、心理的操作その他、様々なものを使って、彼らは、人々を赤化させた。人はそれを地獄と呼ぶ。無間地獄の象徴たる原子爆弾に拠ってもたらされたあの惨禍を、人々は忘れたかの如く、第二次世界大戦後の日本において彼らはそれへとひた走った。）

3:14 PM 10/28/2025




If a matter is not scientifically proven, it does not take effect on some people. In other words, they believe in all the things that are scientifically proven. They are not humans but machines. Even though a man can not recognize himself living in the entity of his flesh as an individual, there is irreversibility as human beings as an objective for analysis, and there is no reversibility as human beings as an objective to be dedicated to a scientific fact. For example, generative artificial intelligence, as innovated, almost generates answers that are negative for this truth. Relying on the fact as an explanation of innovation for infrastructure, GAI is assigned the program, which converts equity into equality, because. The texturization of GAI that explains it as infrastructure results in a given quality for human beings, but programmed GAI includes the contradiction to deny it.

Norikazu Suzuki, Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, implied a pessimistic economic outlook about the expected recent decline in rice prices in Japan. However, he recognizes the decline in rice prices itself as wishful thinking with concrete methods. As he indicated, he also recognized that politics should not intervene in rice prices as appointed out. It is possible to comprehend the Minister who thinks of price competitiveness in the rice market as well as diminished, and it is accurate to identify his policy to control price competitiveness as conceptualized. The adjustment of demand and supply, or export promotion, as the surrounding environment, must be recognized as the intervention nominalized by "non-intervention," systematically. This is a kind of paradox.

（鈴木憲和農林水産大臣は、日本国内の米価の直近の下落の展望について悲観的な見方を示したが、米価の下落自体については具体的対策を伴った上での希望的観測を持っているとの事である。只、政治が例えばコメの価格を指定し固定する様な真似は芳しくないとの認識を示した。同氏は、コメの価格競争力が損なわれる事に懸念を抱いているものと考えられるが、その価格競争力の概念自体をポリシーとしてコントロールしようと試みているのでは？これは、需給調整や輸出促進といった周辺環境を制度的に整える非介入という名の介入であり、一種の逆説である。）

10:50 PM 10/27/2025

The International Court of Justice recommended that Israel has a duty to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza by legal obligations under international law. There is no legal enforceability to it. Whether this advisory opinion issued by the ICJ is acceptable or not depends on a political or diplomatic judgment of an entity to whom the advisory opinion is addressed. The risk of ignoring this is not the manifestation of it, but relying on its existentiality. Bureaucrats and politicians are always carrying out everything according to their plan. As long as Japan is involved, the Japanese media amplifies its voice, as if non-acknowledged people are stirred up. "Those who are unknown" use illusion on each other in that sense, at least, as it should be. Generative artificial intelligence is on a roll, along with the situation, and the more they dance with being overjoyed by given misinformation, the more they become anything like livestock. This misinformation does not necessarily mean no fact. Humans are biological creatures. I am not going to label "Once a loser, always a loser.", to people, but label "No good means no good." As well as giving no notice, the latter is far more than cruel. I think that a hopeless mind harms oneself, by the way, as long as the text above is true, as indicated, people will become hopeful. They are going to die out with satisfaction of identified recognition. People are distinguished between the exterminator and the being exterminated, as phenomenal. There is no room for the texturization of "exterminating or being exterminated."

（イスラエルにガザへの人道支援の国際法的義務有りと国際司法裁判所が勧告。これには法的拘束力は無い。このICJに拠る「勧告的意見」を受諾するかどうかは、被勧告者の政治的もしくは外交的な裁量に委ねられる。これを無視する事のリスクは、顕在するのではなく存在する。お上官僚や政治家は何もかも計画通りに進めているだけである。日本の場合、何も知らない愚民を掻き乱すかの如く、マスコミが騒ぐ。少なくともその意味で「未知」の者達は互いに幻術を掛け合っているかの如くである。生成人工知能はそれに一役買っているが、誤情報を与えられて狂喜乱舞する程、彼らにおける畜肉度は増す。ここで云う誤情報とは、必ずしも事実でない事とは限らない。人は生物である。私は、ここで、人々に「駄目な奴は駄目」というレッテルは貼らない。私は、「駄目なものは駄目」と言う。気付きを与えない分、後者の方が残酷である。私は希望というものは在った方が良いと考えているが、ともかく、以上のテキストが本当のところを指摘している分、人々は希望を抱くだろう。そうして彼らは納得して死に絶えていく。人々が排斥者と被排斥者に分かれるというのは、現象である。其処に「排斥者と被排斥者」というテキストが入り込む余地は無い。）

11:38 AM 10/23/2025




Humans are capable of producing a value worth socializing and the reverse of it. "Peace is something that must be fought for and won." is a famous phrase, but if humans are addicted to the vast consumption of peace, a worse situation, far more than peace, is invited. History has proven that a society in stagnation always decays. The mode of life of lions accurately explains that presence. The male leaves the task of gathering food to the female. He only eats. The combat is destined for a woman. The fear of death torments her. To exterminate uninvited guests, women are struggling, and men's physical thing is just a meal. This mutual devouring is so physical, but it is not necessarily physical enough to identify a meal. The concept of slavery is not necessarily the physical representation of it. Whether acknowledging the slavery of a slave is appropriate or not is out of order. "The texturization of a meal" by the value consciousness of a person who only searches for a meal assigns slavery to a slave. The paradox indicates the existentiality of an insurmountable wall between a man and a woman.

An unfortunate obligation makes a man misunderstand a matter of fact. Even though he is obliged to recognize an unacceptable event, it is conscious as a situation, and it must be convincing for him. For example, even though a man who is proud of the vision of his body damages his flesh on purpose, it is a conscious action as a fact, and it must be, unfortunately, convincing for him. Thus, what is an unconvincing thing? It depends on one's consciousness, as external factors override the capacity of the brain for autonomous cognition. Because of it, the recognition of a matter of fact can not go well. Victimization by physical violence or a specialized effect of any drugs should make the recognition of a matter of fact fanatic, and the emptiness of one's mind is not necessarily contributing to feeling fire as cool. It is the dead end of human beings.

（不幸というのは、強制的に物事について納得が行かない状態にさせられる事である。仮に、納得の行かない事象を押し付けられても、それは事態としては自覚的であり、その限りにおいて納得は行っているという事に為るだろう。例えば、肉体の見た目にプライドを持っている者が、納得の行かなさを味わう為に故意に自己の肉体を傷つけたとしても、それは事態として自覚的であり、残念ながら納得は行っているところのものだろう。では、納得が行かないとはどういう事か？それは、何らかの外部的要因に拠って脳の能作を奪われる場合、（それでも）自覚意識が在る場合に限って、為される。つまり、その様な状態に在る場合、事象の認知は上手く行っていないという事に為る。物理的な暴力に拠る被害や特定の薬物の作用は事象の認知を狂わせるものであり、心頭の滅却が必ずしも火を涼しくするとは限らない。それが人の限界なのである。）

10:09 AM 10/20/2025




Of course, because I once wrote down, mental illness is such a district. The basis of mental illness and the judgmental issue about it exactly exist. Medical reasoning contributes to the distinction of this philosophy as embodied. As my experience of subjectively engaged pharmacological treatment since a generation ago at least, unfortunately, to protect myself, I avoid regularly taking medication now, but I am definitely not going to defy medical or clinical determination for me by psychiatrists. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and this issue may reflect the recognition of non-particularity as a patient through expectations of psychiatrists, however. Fortunately or unfortunately, they prefer the existentiality of those humans. How foolish patients with mental illness are. As I recognize the bloodline on my own, I must pay the price to exterminate fucking-minded blood. Doctors were to carry out compulsory sterilization, and I appreciate their conduct. I emphasize the foolishness of those who recognize the texturization, "the biological self-identity," as a reproductive function of humans or something for which a reproductive function of humans is a sufficient condition. Please be acknowledged by the dead end of you that recognizes being exterminated or your own slavery, as well as being like a cockroach's proliferation.

As long as the semi-public space exists, the issue, which recognizes the social dynamics of occupation, is going to take place. Some people are going to perform the guardians or sentinels of moral order there. While they are obliged by moral order or recognition, they are not capable of telling a lie "out of order." In other words, they do not have a language except for performance, and because they try to occupy non-linguistically or symbolically like that, their violence is paradoxically obvious. On the other hand, a policeman or mafia, for instance, is the director of order and manipulates the violence "out of order." They do not "tell." That people are only capable of "telling a lie."

（半公共空間においては、誰がその場を支配しているかという力学が発生し易く、人々の中にはその場で「道徳的秩序の守護者」として振る舞おうとする連中が居る。彼らは、道徳的演技を強いられている分、「その意味で」、本当の事しか言えない。連中は、演技以外の言語を持たず、その様に非言語的もしくは象徴的な支配を行う為、逆説的に、その暴力性は露骨である。警察官やヤクザは、秩序の演出者であり、言語の外部に在る暴力性を操作する。彼らは、「語らない」。対して、先の連中は、「語る事しか出来ない」。）

0:45 PM 10/18/2025

The United States Congress is not going to reopen as controlled. If this situation continues, President Trump will alter the social system, which enables him to execute the operation with executive authority. The Trump administration looks to be prepared for this alteration. Not only substantially but also nominally, this issue explains the making of the U.S. into a socialist state. In other words, there may be an Americanized Russian country. However, there is a destabilization of the political identification of the U.S., but there is no destabilization of the ethnic identification of U.S. citizens. The world is not the representation of the U.S., and the U.S. is the representation of the world. The U.S. is a historical figure of that configuration. Of course, a war would have been taking place in another paradigm, but it does not take place because of the development of the social system and technological innovation. By the way, the socialization of superpowers must be paradoxically recognized alongside them. This socialization means the transformation of governmental techniques, not ideology. Now, modernized socialism in China is not referred to, and the U.S.-styled socialization is prepared. There, the deepening of governance is so effective as long as it is disguised as liberalism.

（アメリカの議会が機能的に再開する見込みは殆ど無い。これが続く様であれば、トランプ氏は、強権的に（当該の様々の）事案を遂行出来る様社会制度自体を変えてしまう位の事は行うだろう。現トランプ政権はそれの為の下準備を進めている様にも見える。実質的にだけではなく名目的にもアメリカ社会を社会主義化してしまうという事。平たく言えば、アメリカのロシア化。只、それでも、アメリカの政治的アイデンティティは揺るがされても、アメリカ人の民族的アイデンティティは揺るがされないだろう。世界はアメリカの表象ではないが、アメリカは世界の表象である。アメリカというのは歴史概的にそうやって出来上がった国。つまり、別のパラダイムではこの場合戦争に為っていただろうが、この様に社会制度の進展や技術革新が為されている場合それも起こらない。むしろ、それらと歩調を合わせて大国の社会主義化が、逆説的な言い方だが、進んでいる。ここで云う社会主義化とは、イデオロギーではなく統治技術の変容である。この場合、特に中国における「現代化された社会主義」は念頭に置かれておらず、アメリカ型の社会主義化が言及されている。自由主義の皮を被った統制の深化として。）

6:05 PM 10/17/2025

As a man, sexual addiction comes with his mother complex, particularly by patronization, as if he wants to rape a woman. The present Taliban regime in Afghanistan represents it, and it is the most hated icon by women. "Women are not treated as human beings there." If a man feels so intimate with a woman, he must precisely learn and understand the sex of human females, and recognize that it is possible to admire each individual as a woman. When no accountability for patronizing a woman defines him, the poison of a wretched mother complex possesses his notion, as he thought of "So were these the people I was trying to protect?" The reason why a man who is not like him is the possessiveness of a woman contributes to the understandable condition of the sex of human females and women's sexual liberation. Physically having sex is not referred to here, and that physical sexual addiction is to be a piece of evidence that proves the misunderstanding of the sex of human females by him. By the way, Japan has experienced prolonged productivity due to the fake accuracy of a man possessed by a mother complex to increase the population. It is "accurate" to cause social toxicity and social raping. Women's sexual liberation, which is preciously dependent on their sexuality, is a barometer or indicator of the health of society. Women are not the sex slaves of men, as a fundamental problem. "The Woman collective recognizes the social possession of a man." A man wants to possess the woman collective, and the woman collective owns the concept of management of contradiction between or incompatibility of their selves and not their selves. This increases the texturization among men, and women are the antithesis of it. "Ill weeds grow tall," or the increase of population, mentions the occasion. Fortunately or unfortunately, it is counted as fait accompli.

（男というのは結局、性という事に関して、それに巣食うマザーコンプレックスを要因として、女を囲って辱めたいだけ。だから現行のアフガニスタンのタリバン政権の様なものは一番女に嫌われる。「女性が人扱いされていない」とは、そういう事。そんなに女が「可愛い」というのであれば、ヒトのメスの性についてきちんと理解して、女性個々人を当該的にきちんと尊重してやれと思うね。自分の意のままに為らない女で鑑みて、「俺が守ろうとしていたのはこんな奴（ら）だったのか」という感慨を抱くのは、まさにマザコン男の害悪毒の典型。何故そうではない男が女に好まれるかというと、彼らは女の性をきちんと理解していて「女性の性の解放に貢献する」から。私はここで物理的なセックス行為の話をしているのでは勿論無く、その様な者のその様な解釈は女性の性について理解していない事の証左と為る。ちなみに日本は、人口増産の為にその様なマザコン男を社会的に像的に流布し量産していた。社会が乱れるのは当然の事である。その様な社会的強姦はナンセンス。きちんと女性の性に根差した上での女性の「解放」され具合というのは、社会の健康のバロメーター。女性達は、基本的な問題として、男性の所有物には為らない。男性の社会的所有という事であれば、それはむしろ女集団という事において為されているだろう。男は女を集団的に所有したがり、女性達は自分達の背反の管理概を司る。それは男性におけるテキスト化を促進し、女性はそれ（へ）のアンチテーゼである。「憎まれっ子世に憚り」といった事や人口増産は、その様な事に拠って為される。幸か不幸か、それらは、全て既成事実としてカウントされる。）

10:30 PM 10/16/2025




Aesthetic principle is a device in which subjectivity takes place in a kind of orderliness. The problem is the determination of. If it is not necessary to recognize a situation, paradoxically, it is impossible to distinguish between it and an experience with it. Fundamental experimentation must be recognized then. If a man is capable of preserving sanity and integrity, he is a very creature of beauty, but this is an irony. Whether one can understand it or not depends on the ability to identify the texturization, "the biological self-identity." If one can not do it, one is falling into the hell of texturization as well. "The biological self-identity" is the texturization of "it."

Daron Acemoglu, recipient of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, is very critical of generative artificial intelligence. Likewise, there is obviously a taste of individual television. However, a sharp increase in productivity hoped for by enterprises is conspicuous in certain respects. By the way, representing itself, Professor Acemoglu is anxious about institutional violence and structural violence included in GAI. For example, Diella, the AI-powered minister appointed in Albania, depends on a replacement not of entire jobs, but of specific tasks. It is possible to recognize systemic exclusion, making laborers invisible. OpenAI's Sam Altman mentioned artificial intelligence as a fundamental human right, and the issue can be interpreted into the crossover of technology and systems. Because there is no need to recognize fundamental human rights as mere ornaments, what Altman said is so appropriate. It is, in the case of making human rights technological, not making each technology human rights. From this perspective, to that extent, GAI of today is just a tool, at least, and in fact, this issue paradoxically contains the possibility of excluding humans from society.

（西暦2024年度のノーベル経済学賞受賞者のダロン・アセモグル氏は、現行の生成人工知能に対して批判的である。確かに、それについて、個人対応テレビジョンの様な（程度の）ニュアンスは拭えない。只、企業が期待するような生産性の急上昇はある程度もしくはある側面においては露骨だろう。ところで、アセモグル氏は、生成人工知能の制度的暴力性や構造的暴力性を指摘しそれを危惧している。アルバニアで採用されたAI閣僚「ディエラ」の件で鑑みても、これは職の代替ではなくタスクの代替である。それは、制度的に労働者を不可視化し、排除する構造を生み出す可能性が在る。米OpenAIのサム・アルトマン氏は人工知能の基本的人権化について言及しているが、これは、技術と制度のクロスオーバーとも取れるだろう。適用されないお飾りなだけである基本的人権など無用の長物なので、アルトマン氏の言っている事には妥当性が在る。只、それは、人権の技術化という事においてであり、技術の人権化という事においてではない。その意味で、どう頑張っても、少なくとも現行の生成人工知能はツールに過ぎなく、それが逆説的に人を排除する可能性を秘めている。）

9:00 PM 10/14/2025




It is allowed, as an opportunity, for generative artificial intelligences or music streaming services to recognize themselves as a social device for weeding out. No more than people of ability or practical ones, so many of the Japanese "famous" persons are surviving tenaciously now, and almost all of them are industrial wastes who spew harmful influences into society on purpose, and who are responsible for properly disposing of themselves. There is no social place to hide for them. By means of the concept of the “culture industry,” Adorno criticized the way in which popular entertainment loses the critical potential of art. "Systemic protection" for those persons must be stripped away, and GAIs or music streaming services have the ability or possibility of it. The substantiality of art or creation is capable of providing recognition of the problem, as experiences of each individual relying on an ambiguous perspective on their period of livelihood make people understand it. Of course, art or creation is not a tool of exhibitionistic desire, an instrument for realizing social malice, and a vehicle for monetary gain. If one wants to commit to art or creation, it is not necessary to turn them into one’s bread and butter. They are not enough to become one’s bread and butter. Let us take a look at a street artist displaying their paintings on the street or street musicians playing instruments. In this sense, GAIs are just a parameter of a socially valuable act, and the recognition of their usage as a problematic issue is out of order.

According to academic substance, it must refer to the optimization of self-distinguishment for their purpose as academism. It is just an overloaded human psyche, which simply fears violence. It is accurate to work out as "persona of rationality," which means opportunities to avoid conflict and confusion. Of course, it is only the way for human resources to be moderate at the surface. It is only the product of that human psyche, simply fearing violence. This contribution does not work, as there is fundamental violence in human society as a phenomenon, and it does not constitute a social problem as a basic issue. Many academic studies have figured out that violence is just as a deviation or exception, and it rejects the recognition of final exemplification representing oppression, inequality, and craving. Education or economic policy, for instance, may reproduce a violent nature as well as the human psyche. Universities and institutes are desirable for "concrete fruit" rather than substantiality as a matter of fact, and many academic issues are purposeful for accumulation by acknowledgement or refinement of theory. It is out of order.

（アカデミズム一般に対して云える事だが、学問の為の学問に終始し自己目的化しているという事が在るだろう。それは、「暴力を恐れる心理」の延長線上に在り、対立や混乱を避ける事を第一義とした「理性の仮面」として機能している面が在る。それは結局、人的資本の（表層的な）穏健性の為の餌であり、人々が暴力を恐れる心理の産物でしか無いだろう。それは、人の社会における現象としての暴力を回避する事に貢献せず、問題の根本的な解決に為っていない。多くの学問は暴力を逸脱や例外として扱い、抑圧や格差や欲望に拠って表象される根源的な構造に踏み込む事は無い。教育や経済政策が、むしろ人にまつわって暴力性を再生産している。大学や研究機関は物事の本質的な問いよりも「具体的な成果」を求められることが多く、多くの学問が「知の蓄積」や「理論の精緻化」を目的とし、現実の問題解決から乖離している。）

9:01 AM 10/11/2025




It is impossible to commit a deadly act against a man, even though he is a man whom others feel aversion toward or can not stand the existence of. Thus, fundamentally, it is impossible to refuse his existentiality itself. He tries to make you understand it. It is an obvious issue of attacking others, as well as being offensive to others. Still, it is pleasant enough to recognize others as enemies. In this context, they are conceivably offensive, by the way. It is said that there is a trap of left-winged education, which disturbs the recognition of or against an enemy under the circumstances. Since the beginning, humans have learned the world probabilistically. It is the same case with mother language. Anything unpleasant regenerates, as recognition in the self abstracts away the probabilistic nature of the world. When it comes to being unpleasant, the probabilistic nature has lost in the world, and the world becomes "the subjectivity" of recognition.

There is stagnation in real wages inside Japan. Of course, unless wages increase as much as prices do, households will struggle to maintain their living standards, and the problem is whether the money that an individual receives satisfies each individual's demand for currency or not. If there is no ability to reincarnate his demand at corporate activities, the company intends to release human resources. In this context, at present, it prefers high liquidity of human resources in the labor market, and the succession of companies collapsing due to a lack of humans is the reason why it is pleasing to bureaucrats. In other words, natural selection phenomenally depends on the existence of companies that can not raise wages or those that do not have the recognition to raise wages. Even if people's existentiality recognizes anti-socialism as long as it follows the U.S., it must adopt no ignorance of reality and people's existentiality, hoping for natural selection, as there are people who defy the development of the social system and innovation. Conspiratorial thinking is not capable of explaining economic phenomena. "Ask, and it shall be given to you."

（日本国内における実質賃金の伸び悩みについて。要するに、単純に物価が上昇する分賃金が上昇しなければ生活は追い付かない訳で、個人が受け取る賃金が当該個人のカレンシー需要を満たすか否かという事である。これを満たす能力を持たない企業は、人材の流出を招く。その意味で、少なくとも現行では、労働市場における人材の流動性は高い方が好ましく、人手不足に拠って倒産する企業の続出はお上にとって得てしたりという訳である。逆に云えば、賃金を上げる能力や賃金を上げる意志のそもそも無い企業の存在で鑑みて、現象的に自然淘汰は起こるという訳である。これは、反社会主義を旨とするアメリカ追従とも取れるが、そもそも社会制度の進展や技術革新の高速度を否定する人々の存在で鑑みて、現実を無視する事は出来ないという事であり、人々自身がそれを望み行っているという事である。経済現象は陰謀論では説明出来ない。「求めよ、されば与えられん」。）

5:26 PM 10/9/2025




Satan is falling out in Avīci Hell. He is a realist without being rescued. I am a nominalist.

Under a negotiation between Israel and Hamas, if this peace talk breaks down, there is an acknowledgement of catastrophe with Hamas in the way of annihilation. However, they are going to insist on their justice, dictating the global pressure against Israel. They are committing suicidal solutions with terrorism on their own. Some experts analyze that it is to be recognized for Hamas's possibility to justify a political or symbolic victory rather than a military victory. Regardless of the simple extermination of Hamas, if the negotiation collapses, it can be obviously accomplished by military power by Israel and the U.S. The U.S. Trump administration is depending on forcible measures against absolute resistance to terrorist organizations. Public sentiment is almost none of our business. Let's take a look. Do you understand it?

（ガザ情勢に関して、ハマスは、この交渉が決裂したら殲滅される事を知りながら、イスラエルに対する国際世論を圧力に自分らの主張を押し通すつもりだろう。彼らは自分らのテロリズムが通用すると思っている。一部の専門家は「ハマスは、軍事的勝利よりも、政治的もしくは世論的な勝利を重視している」と分析している。単純な殲滅で問題が解決するとかしないとかではなくて、イスラエル（やアメリカ）がこの交渉が決裂した場合軍事力を行使する事は自明。米トランプ政権は、テロ組織に譲歩しないという姿勢に拠り強行的。世論の力などというものはそもそも限定的であり、現実を見ろという事。）

7:20 AM 10/9/2025




From the Babylonian Captivity, which marked the beginning of the Jewish Diaspora, there have paradoxically been opportunities to optimize their social power all over the world. With tremendous victimization, it is enough to publicize that they have been in a social role of penal servitude among human beings like those. Even though there is a strengthening of authoritarian rule in Israel at present, it must be recognized that the social dependency of Jewish folk is reflected by the existence of no place to go across the globe. In the long-lasting human history, the sociality of victimization has eradicated or gotten rid of the Israeli identity. Of course, the coming authoritarianization inside their society as popularity must be necessitated, even though others are in a role of themselves with their distinction.

I have a different degree of alignment between what I say and what I do. We will have encountered the death of each individual. Still, there is inconsistency between words and actions, and we cannot overcome the contradiction of a certain kind of reality. Because I am not going to hope for a human-like, wonderful life, which ordinary people do, I do not belong to it. I do not feel it as a pleasure. Thus, if I agree with something, I am to be "adjusted." Since my childhood, I have not been inclined towards greed. As they say, "Ask, and it shall be given you," I am consistently fascinated with manifested content about it.

（私は、言っている事と行っている事の間に若干のズレが在る。我々個々人何時かは死に遭遇するという事が在るが、言行不一致という事においてやはり生きていて現実に勝てない側面というのは在る。私が一般的な人々の様に人間らしい生を送ろうと思わないのは、単（ひとえ）に自らがそれに適さないと考えるからである。実感としてその方が楽だからという事も有るが、ともかく、何かを望んだ場合私は「正常化」するだろう。私は、幼少時より、あまり強欲な方ではなかった。「求めよ、されば与えられん」という言説にまつわって、それにまつわる顕在性が自体的に私を魅了する。）

1:27 PM 10/8/2025

（例えば「人生を謳歌せねばならない」という理念は、それが適わなかった場合の自己が社会不適応者であるかの様な思い込みやそれについての不満足をもたらすリスクを孕む。それは人という生き物にまつわる一種の社会的洗脳である。その社会的洗脳であるところの社会的言語は勿論テキスト化に拠って為されるが、つまり、テキスト化に拠ってそれが社会的言語化される事で人はそれを学習してしまうのであり、それがリスクだという事である。勿論、それは学習能力や学習機能の事ではなく、学習そのものの事である。「知っても知ってもキリが無い」の対象が何を意味するか？それは自己のリスク化である。リスクの概念と化した自己が反社会性を帯びるという皮肉な逆説が、人において人の生物学的な自己同一性が無視されるという事に拠って為される。人々が一般的に社会性であると思い込んでいるそれは社会性ではないのである。）

8:03 AM 10/5/2025




As a way to consider a villain, it remains on the particularity of simply whether one is outspoken under recognition or not. It is capable of distinguishing one under recognition as good and one not under recognition as bad, and by the way, there is an alternative way to divide human gathering into versus. Therefore, both capital-intensive and labor-intensive are to be recognized among the people, and the latter makes a human texturized in particular. It is capable of being said that the sinner is not peripheral but constitutive of society's core, and they operate within a closed circuit of their own making. The present civilization is a fruit of the former, but it is the product or definition of being abstract. This presentation overthrows itself as labor-intensive as being concrete. There should be recognition of slavery. I once wrote down that the synonym of "abstract" is not "concrete," and there must be no exemplification for the existence of me. This claim is much more than their existence, and my goodness, as hypocrisy, acknowledges something bad. They own the immediacy of the texturization of the difference between being abstract and being concrete. They are not capable of understanding it.

This peace proposal, which is supposed to make Hamas obey the U.S. as an ally of Israel, is forcing them to recognize the determination, whether to surrender or be exterminated. In fact, it is enlightened to adopt the refusal by Hamas alongside the determination itself. Hamas fighters, as their existential problem, can not be identified absolutely. This fact may be recognizing the process of self-proving of denial of subjectivity by the action of rejection..."Who becomes the victim of surrender?" It is a systemic solution to terrorism as a substantial problem.

（イスラエル情勢に際して今回アメリカがハマスに対して提示した和平案は、彼らに降伏か壊滅かを選択させるものである。只、実際のところ、その選択自体がハマスに拠って拒絶される事が念頭に置かれている。つまり、存在概としてのハマスにまつわるアイデンティティーは悉く否定されている。これは、主体の否認を拒否という行為に拠って自己証明させるプロセスとも取れるが…「降伏すら許さない」？これは、本質的な問題として、テロリズムに対する制度的解答である。）

4:45 PM 10/2/2025




As Israel demands the evacuation of Gaza's citizens, Hamas is going to reject the peace proposal by the U.S. The denial of existence with them depends on the recognition of terrorists by others. In fact, Hamas terrorists have committed terrorism. This is a fact. The existence of terrorists as participants in terrorism must be denied as systemic. It should be said that self-inflicted suffering, and there are some kinds of exaggeration with self-destruction, eradication, self-annihilation, and collapse, but "nirvana" is the appropriate expression to understand. It ironically expresses the definitive existentiality of negation of being as well as the phenomenal. Is it nirvana for them? "The end of far-right ideology" is appointed. Tathāgata Shakyamuni, as a texturization, tells something. Whether it is good or bad, it is not enough to be disturbing.

It is possible to claim systemic blockade in Afghanistan, as a nationwide suspension of internet access and phone lines in the country. It is the same case with women in the country, as they are to be left in dire straits because of the halt in international assistance. Unfortunately, it designates a severe reality over them as biological creatures, as human females are the female version of human males. In other words, human males are the male version of human females, it is said. It is not related to the fact of being a female alongside everybody as inborn in the mother’s womb. Thus, this exemplification in Afghanistan might be recognized as an interactive self-deprecating national attitude by both men and women. It can not be blamed on the incapacity of women in the country, superstitiously. This pathological state should be called "the end of the system" as well as "the happiness of the system in the end." By the way, does this substantial national isolation in Afghanistan rely on what factor from the outer zone? It is too understanding to recognize it as pressure from other countries, and the Afghan citizens are not to be taken seriously for their own purposes. "For human rights" or "against terrorism" declares the assignment of sanctions to the country, but it is hoped for not "the end of the system" but "systemic transformation." However, if there is abandonment, the system is too transformative to shut down as simply. As it is released, particularly from the world, it becomes dying. The reason why the system is capable of regenerating is rejection by the outer, which refuses to connect to the system and exterminate it. This means the way to understand that the system is not "the existence of relativeness" but just "the dying out of itself." And then, this extinction reproduces the cruel structure that represents life-sustaining treatment or extraordinary measures of the system with life, particularly for women, as being inside the system.

（アフガニスタンにおける近日のインターネット回線全面遮断や電話遮断で鑑みると、これについて制度的封鎖と言う事が可能だろう。国外からの援助の停止で困窮するのは同国の女性も同じ。残念ながら、それはヒトのメスがヒトのオスのメスバージョンでしかないという、生態における人の残酷な現実を示している。逆に云えば、ヒトのオスはヒトのメスのオスバージョンであるという事。母親の胎内で、ヒトは先天的には皆メスであるという概ねの事実はこれとは関係が無い。ともかく、アフガニスタンでの例は、男性と女性に拠る相互的な国家的自虐であると考えられるだろう。同国の女性の無力さに罪業が在る訳では無いが、残念ながら。この病理は、「制度の死」というか、「死ねたら幸せだよね、制度」っていうね。ところで、この実質上のアフガニスタンの鎖国が、（同国における）何らかの外部的な要因に基づくものだとしたら？（同国における）国外的圧力と云うと語弊が在るが、彼らもあくまで本意にてそう在るのでは無いという。国際社会は「人権の為」「テロ防止の為」という名目で制裁を課しているが、それは「制度の死」を望んでいる訳ではなく、「制度の変容」を期待している。しかし、その期待が制度の内側に届かない場合、制度は変容出来ないまま閉鎖される。つまり、制度は殺されずに放置される事で、死ねないまま生き続ける。制度が死ねないのは、外部が殺す事も接続する事も拒否しているから。これは、制度が「関係性の場」ではなく、「関係性の断絶の場」として存在することを意味する。そして、その断絶は、制度の内側に居る人々特に女性にとって、生きる事が制度の延命措置に為るという残酷な構造を生み出す。）

11:05 AM 10/1/2025

President of the State Affairs Commission of the DPRK, Kim Jong-un, definitely confessed that he had a good memory of U.S. President Trump. While President of the Republic of Korea, Lee Jae-Myung, declared that the ROK shares their lot with the DPRK, Kim Jong-un publicized that the DPRK is going to have an absolute commitment to nuclear power. The Chinese ethnic group and the Korean ethnic group are highly emphasizing their ethnicity, and it is a concern for dissidents who are necessarily discriminated against in the prolonged category. Of course, DPRK citizens are to be or perform victimized with discrimination. In this sense, they are intimate with texturization in the Korean ethnic group. DPRK people are perfect performers. Regardless of whether each of them understands it or not, their existentiality remains in submergence. Among the NK people and the SK people, across the border, gazing at each other stands for the constitution as an international contribution. Comprehending these circumstances, DPRK leader Kim Jong-un has recognized his presence. He exactly acknowledges the poverty of his country and its citizens. They also can not betray the biological self-identity of human beings. "Ask, and it shall be given you." Unfortunately, the Japanese have been engulfed in their own blood. It is happy to see them become Ouroboros.

（北朝鮮の金正恩氏がとうとう吐いた。「トランプ氏とは個人的には良い思い出も在る」と。韓国の李在明大統領が北朝鮮とは一蓮托生でやっていくといった様な事を表明する中で、金正恩氏は核は絶対に手放さないと。中華民族も朝鮮民族も自分達の民族性を声高に謳うが、同一カテゴリーの中で反乱分子というのは被排斥者という形で必ず生じる。無論、北朝鮮の国民は被排斥者を演じている。その意味で、彼らは、朝鮮民族におけるという事での、テキストなのである。北朝鮮の人々は完全な演技者である。彼ら一人一人がそれを理解しているか理解していないかという事には関係なく、彼らはそういう存在である。北朝鮮の人々と韓国の人々においては、国境を境に、互いを見据える事が国際貢献として成り立っている。これらの事を完全に理解した上で、金正恩氏は現状を認めているのである。彼も自国やその民が貧しい事は分かり切っている。彼らも、また、人々の生物学的な自己同一性を裏切る事は出来ない。「求めよ、されば与えられん」。日本人は、残念ながら、自らの血に溺れてしまった。ウロボロスと為る事が出来たらば、幸せだろう。）

3:05 PM 9/27/2025




Humans are increasingly opting for convenience over inconvenience, which should be a natural choice given the principles of hedonism. Of course, the act of each economic entity maximizing its profit is not optimization at the societal level. As Socrates said, justice means that each individual performs their own proper role, and it is a little bit simple or much more than ideal to mention. Therefore, there is a question of recognition of "hedonic experience," as it must be. Somewhat embodied as a definitive objective has no worth, as it must be. What is incredible? If the denial of pleasure is a fruit of a phenomenon, it is the world of a death row inmate. Maybe there is no impressive question whether it is a pleasure or not, and all is a product of texturization there. It represents not the ascription of punishment but the essentialization of crime as an attribute.

（「自分を大切に」というのは、私が今まで生きてきて、幾多の人々から様々に云われてきた忠告である。確かに、物理的な自傷癖の様なものは、私には在る。例えば、「右左のイデオロギーは、個人の意思に拠って選別可能なものか？」という問いに、「否。」と答えてしまうのは、自虐の一種だろう。云わゆる決め付けである。謙虚な精神を持ち合わせていれば、その様な事には至らない筈である。只、私の場合、それは非常な物理的な表象でもってして現れる。例えば、男女の性別についてである。人の性別は、人が人である事の、十分条件である。それが必要条件と為ってしまっているのが、上記の私の状態である。しかし、逆説的に、その状態では、物理的であるが故に性転換の様なものは肯定されてしまう。つまり、性別というのは、個々人におけるギブンとしての持ち物であるという事である。男女における固定された社会的な性役割というのは否定されるだろう。逆に、右左のイデオロギーと為ると、それは人の物理を通り越えており抽象的である。（其処では）カント的な都合の良いアンチノミーは存在しない。自己は矛盾でも何でもないのである。ちなみに、私は具体の対義語が抽象であるとは考えていない。）

9:16 PM 9/26/2025

9:30 PM 9/26/2025