card

There is stagnation in real wages inside Japan. Of course, unless wages increase as much as prices do, households will struggle to maintain their living standards, and the problem is whether the money that an individual receives satisfies each individual's demand for currency or not. If there is no ability to reincarnate his demand at corporate activities, the company intends to release human resources. In this context, at present, it prefers high liquidity of human resources in the labor market, and the succession of companies collapsing due to a lack of humans is the reason why it is pleasing to bureaucrats. In other words, natural selection phenomenally depends on the existence of companies that can not raise wages or those that do not have the recognition to raise wages. Even if people's existentiality recognizes anti-socialism as long as it follows the U.S., it must adopt no ignorance of reality and people's existentiality, hoping for natural selection, as there are people who defy the development of the social system and innovation. Conspiratorial thinking is not capable of explaining economic phenomena. "Ask, and it shall be given to you."

（日本国内における実質賃金の伸び悩みについて。要するに、単純に物価がする分賃金が上昇しなければ生活は追い付かない訳で、個人が受け取る賃金が当該個人のカレンシー需要を満たすか否かという事である。これを満たす能力を持たない企業は、人材の流出を招く。その意味で、少なくとも現行では、労働市場における人材の流動性は高い方が好ましく、人手不足に拠って倒産する企業の続出はお上にとって得てしたりという訳である。逆に云えば、賃金を上げる能力や賃金を上げる意志のそもそも無い企業の存在で鑑みて、現象的に自然淘汰は起こるという訳である。これは、反社会主義を旨とするアメリカ追従とも取れるが、そもそも社会制度の進展や技術革新の高速度を否定する人々の存在で鑑みて、現実を無視する事は出来ないという事であり、人々自身がそれを望み行っているという事である。経済現象は陰謀論では説明出来ない。「求めよ、されば与えられん」。）

5:26 PM 10/9/2025

Under a negotiation between Israel and Hamas, if this peace talk breaks down, there is an acknowledgement of catastrophe with Hamas in the way of annihilation. However, they are going to insist on their justice, dictating the global pressure against Israel. They are committing suicidal solutions with terrorism on their own. Some experts analyze that it is to be recognized for Hamas's possibility to justify a political or symbolic victory rather than a military victory. Regardless of the simple extermination of Hamas, if the negotiation collapses, it can be obviously accomplished by military power by Israel and the U.S. The U.S. Trump administration is depending on forcible measures against absolute resistance to terrorist organizations. Public sentiment is almost none of our business. Let's take a look. Do you understand it?

（ガザ情勢に関して、ハマスは、この交渉が決裂したら殲滅される事を知りながら、イスラエルに対する国際世論を圧力に自分らの主張を押し通すつもりだろう。彼らは自分らのテロリズムが通用すると思っている。一部の専門家は「ハマスは、軍事的勝利よりも、政治的もしくは世論的な勝利を重視している」と分析している。単純な殲滅で問題が解決するとかしないとかではなくて、イスラエル（やアメリカ）がこの交渉が決裂した場合軍事力を行使する事は自明。米トランプ政権は、テロ組織に譲歩しないという姿勢に拠り強行的。世論の力などというものはそもそも限定的であり、現実を見ろという事。）

7:20 AM 10/9/2025




From the Babylonian Captivity, which marked the beginning of the Jewish Diaspora, there have paradoxically been opportunities to optimize their social power all over the world. With tremendous victimization, it is enough to publicize that they have been in a social role of penal servitude among human beings like those. Even though there is a strengthening of authoritarian rule in Israel at present, it must be recognized that the social dependency of Jewish folk is reflected by the existence of no place to go across the globe. In the long-lasting human history, the sociality of victimization has eradicated or gotten rid of the Israeli identity. Of course, the coming authoritarianization inside their society as popularity must be necessitated, even though others are in a role of themselves with their distinction.

I have a different degree of alignment between what I say and what I do. We will have encountered the death of each individual. Still, there is inconsistency between words and actions, and we cannot overcome the contradiction of a certain kind of reality. Because I am not going to hope for a human-like, wonderful life, which ordinary people do, I do not belong to it. I do not feel it as a pleasure. Thus, if I agree with something, I am to be "adjusted." Since my childhood, I have not been inclined towards greed. As they say, "Ask, and it shall be given you," I am consistently fascinated with manifested content about it.

（私は、言っている事と行っている事の間に若干のズレが在る。我々個々人何時かは死に遭遇するという事が在るが、言行不一致という事においてやはり生きていて現実に勝てない側面というのは在る。私が一般的な人々の様に人間らしい生を送ろうと思わないのは、単（ひとえ）に自らがそれに適さないと考えるからである。実感としてその方が楽だからという事も有るが、ともかく、何かを望んだ場合私は「正常化」するだろう。私は、幼少時より、あまり強欲な方ではなかった。「求めよ、されば与えられん」という言説にまつわって、それにまつわる顕在性が自体的に私を魅了する。）

1:27 PM 10/8/2025

（例えば「人生を謳歌せねばならない」という理念は、それが適わなかった場合の自己が社会不適応者であるかの様な思い込みやそれについての不満足をもたらすリスクを孕む。それは人という生き物にまつわる一種の社会的洗脳である。その社会的洗脳であるところの社会的言語は勿論テキスト化に拠って為されるが、つまり、テキスト化に拠ってそれが社会的言語化される事で人はそれを学習してしまうのであり、それがリスクだという事である。勿論、それは学習能力や学習機能の事ではなく、学習そのものの事である。「知っても知ってもキリが無い」の対象が何を意味するか？それは自己のリスク化である。リスクの概念と化した自己が反社会性を帯びるという皮肉な逆説が、人において人の生物学的な自己同一性が無視されるという事に拠って為される。人々が一般的に社会性であると思い込んでいるそれは社会性ではないのである。）

8:03 AM 10/5/2025




As a way to consider a villain, it remains on the particularity of simply whether one is outspoken under recognition or not. It is capable of distinguishing one under recognition as good and one not under recognition as bad, and by the way, there is an alternative way to divide human gathering into versus. Therefore, both capital-intensive and labor-intensive are to be recognized among the people, and the latter makes a human texturized in particular. It is capable of being said that the sinner is not peripheral but constitutive of society's core, and they operate within a closed circuit of their own making. The present civilization is a fruit of the former, but it is the product or definition of being abstract. This presentation overthrows itself as labor-intensive as being concrete. There should be recognition of slavery. I once wrote down that the synonym of "abstract" is not "concrete," and there must be no exemplification for the existence of me. This claim is much more than their existence, and my goodness, as hypocrisy, acknowledges something bad. They own the immediacy of the texturization of the difference between being abstract and being concrete. They are not capable of understanding it.

This peace proposal, which is supposed to make Hamas obey the U.S. as an ally of Israel, is forcing them to recognize the determination, whether to surrender or be exterminated. In fact, it is enlightened to adopt the refusal by Hamas alongside the determination itself. Hamas fighters, as their existential problem, can not be identified absolutely. This fact may be recognizing the process of self-proving of denial of subjectivity by the action of rejection..."Who becomes the victim of surrender?" It is a systemic solution to terrorism as a substantial problem.

（イスラエル情勢に際して今回アメリカがハマスに対して提示した和平案は、彼らに降伏か壊滅かを選択させるものである。只、実際のところ、その選択自体がハマスに拠って拒絶される事が念頭に置かれている。つまり、存在概としてのハマスにまつわるアイデンティティーは悉く否定されている。これは、主体の否認を拒否という行為に拠って自己証明させるプロセスとも取れるが…「降伏すら許さない」？これは、本質的な問題として、テロリズムに対する制度的解答である。）

4:45 PM 10/2/2025




As Israel demands the evacuation of Gaza's citizens, Hamas is going to reject the peace proposal by the U.S. The denial of existence with them depends on the recognition of terrorists by others. In fact, Hamas terrorists have committed terrorism. This is a fact. The existence of terrorists as participants in terrorism must be denied as systemic. It should be said that self-inflicted suffering, and there are some kinds of exaggeration with self-destruction, eradication, self-annihilation, and collapse, but "nirvana" is the appropriate expression to understand. It ironically expresses the definitive existentiality of negation of being as well as the phenomenal. Is it nirvana for them? "The end of far-right ideology" is appointed. Tathāgata Shakyamuni, as a texturization, tells something. Whether it is good or bad, it is not enough to be disturbing.

It is possible to claim systemic blockade in Afghanistan, as a nationwide suspension of internet access and phone lines in the country. It is the same case with women in the country, as they are to be left in dire straits because of the halt in international assistance. Unfortunately, it designates a severe reality over them as biological creatures, as human females are the female version of human males. In other words, human males are the male version of human females, it is said. It is not related to the fact of being a female alongside everybody as inborn in the mother’s womb. Thus, this exemplification in Afghanistan might be recognized as an interactive self-deprecating national attitude by both men and women. It can not be blamed on the incapacity of women in the country, superstitiously. This pathological state should be called "the end of the system" as well as "the happiness of the system in the end." By the way, does this substantial national isolation in Afghanistan rely on what factor from the outer zone? It is too understanding to recognize it as pressure from other countries, and the Afghan citizens are not to be taken seriously for their own purposes. "For human rights" or "against terrorism" declares the assignment of sanctions to the country, but it is hoped for not "the end of the system" but "systemic transformation." However, if there is abandonment, the system is too transformative to shut down as simply. As it is released, particularly from the world, it becomes dying. The reason why the system is capable of regenerating is rejection by the outer, which refuses to connect to the system and exterminate it. This means the way to understand that the system is not "the existence of relativeness" but just "the dying out of itself." And then, this extinction reproduces the cruel structure that represents life-sustaining treatment or extraordinary measures of the system with life, particularly for women, as being inside the system.

（アフガニスタンにおける近日のインターネット回線全面遮断や電話遮断で鑑みると、これについて制度的封鎖と言う事が可能だろう。国外からの援助の停止で困窮するのは同国の女性も同じ。残念ながら、それはヒトのメスがヒトのオスのメスバージョンでしかないという、生態における人の残酷な現実を示している。逆に云えば、ヒトのオスはヒトのメスのオスバージョンであるという事。母親の胎内で、ヒトは先天的には皆メスであるという概ねの事実はこれとは関係が無い。ともかく、アフガニスタンでの例は、男性と女性に拠る相互的な国家的自虐であると考えられるだろう。同国の女性の無力さに罪業が在る訳では無いが、残念ながら。この病理は、「制度の死」というか、「死ねたら幸せだよね、制度」っていうね。ところで、この実質上のアフガニスタンの鎖国が、（同国における）何らかの外部的な要因に基づくものだとしたら？（同国における）国外的圧力と云うと語弊が在るが、彼らもあくまで本意にてそう在るのでは無いという。国際社会は「人権の為」「テロ防止の為」という名目で制裁を課しているが、それは「制度の死」を望んでいる訳ではなく、「制度の変容」を期待している。しかし、その期待が制度の内側に届かない場合、制度は変容出来ないまま閉鎖される。つまり、制度は殺されずに放置される事で、死ねないまま生き続ける。制度が死ねないのは、外部が殺す事も接続する事も拒否しているから。これは、制度が「関係性の場」ではなく、「関係性の断絶の場」として存在することを意味する。そして、その断絶は、制度の内側に居る人々特に女性にとって、生きる事が制度の延命措置に為るという残酷な構造を生み出す。）

11:05 AM 10/1/2025

President of the State Affairs Commission of the DPRK, Kim Jong-un, definitely confessed that he had a good memory of U.S. President Trump. While President of the Republic of Korea, Lee Jae-Myung, declared that the ROK shares their lot with the DPRK, Kim Jong-un publicized that the DPRK is going to have an absolute commitment to nuclear power. The Chinese ethnic group and the Korean ethnic group are highly emphasizing their ethnicity, and it is a concern for dissidents who are necessarily discriminated against in the prolonged category. Of course, DPRK citizens are to be or perform victimized with discrimination. In this sense, they are intimate with texturization in the Korean ethnic group. DPRK people are perfect performers. Regardless of whether each of them understands it or not, their existentiality remains in submergence. Among the NK people and the SK people, across the border, gazing at each other stands for the constitution as an international contribution. Comprehending these circumstances, DPRK leader Kim Jong-un has recognized his presence. He exactly acknowledges the poverty of his country and its citizens. They also can not betray the biological self-identity of human beings. "Ask, and it shall be given you." Unfortunately, the Japanese have been engulfed in their own blood. It is happy to see them become Ouroboros.

（北朝鮮の金正恩氏がとうとう吐いた。「トランプ氏とは個人的には良い思い出も在る」と。韓国の李在明大統領が北朝鮮とは一蓮托生でやっていくといった様な事を表明する中で、金正恩氏は核は絶対に手放さないと。中華民族も朝鮮民族も自分達の民族性を声高に謳うが、同一カテゴリーの中で反乱分子というのは被排斥者という形で必ず生じる。無論、北朝鮮の国民は被排斥者を演じている。その意味で、彼らは、朝鮮民族におけるという事での、テキストなのである。北朝鮮の人々は完全な演技者である。彼ら一人一人がそれを理解しているか理解していないかという事には関係なく、彼らはそういう存在である。北朝鮮の人々と韓国の人々においては、国境を境に、互いを見据える事が国際貢献として成り立っている。これらの事を完全に理解した上で、金正恩氏は現状を認めているのである。彼も自国やその民が貧しい事は分かり切っている。彼らも、また、人々の生物学的な自己同一性を裏切る事は出来ない。「求めよ、されば与えられん」。日本人は、残念ながら、自らの血に溺れてしまった。ウロボロスと為る事が出来たらば、幸せだろう。）

3:05 PM 9/27/2025




Humans are increasingly opting for convenience over inconvenience, which should be a natural choice given the principles of hedonism. Of course, the act of each economic entity maximizing its profit is not optimization at the societal level. As Socrates said, justice means that each individual performs their own proper role, and it is a little bit simple or much more than ideal to mention. Therefore, there is a question of recognition of "hedonic experience," as it must be. Somewhat embodied as a definitive objective has no worth, as it must be. What is incredible? If the denial of pleasure is a fruit of a phenomenon, it is the world of a death row inmate. Maybe there is no impressive question whether it is a pleasure or not, and all is a product of texturization there. It represents not the ascription of punishment but the essentialization of crime as an attribute.

（「自分を大切に」というのは、私が今まで生きてきて、幾多の人々から様々に云われてきた忠告である。確かに、物理的な自傷癖の様なものは、私には在る。例えば、「右左のイデオロギーは、個人の意思に拠って選別可能なものか？」という問いに、「否。」と答えてしまうのは、自虐の一種だろう。云わゆる決め付けである。謙虚な精神を持ち合わせていれば、その様な事には至らない筈である。只、私の場合、それは非常な物理的な表象でもってして現れる。例えば、男女の性別についてである。人の性別は、人が人である事の、十分条件である。それが必要条件と為ってしまっているのが、上記の私の状態である。しかし、逆説的に、その状態では、物理的であるが故に性転換の様なものは肯定されてしまう。つまり、性別というのは、個々人におけるギブンとしての持ち物であるという事である。男女における固定された社会的な性役割というのは否定されるだろう。逆に、右左のイデオロギーと為ると、それは人の物理を通り越えており抽象的である。（其処では）カント的な都合の良いアンチノミーは存在しない。自己は矛盾でも何でもないのである。ちなみに、私は具体の対義語が抽象であるとは考えていない。）

9:16 PM 9/26/2025

9:30 PM 9/26/2025

Earlier, I mentioned labor-intensive human resources and capital-intensive human resources. The texturization of human relationships is becoming labor-intensive, affecting the integrity of human resources. Human resources are fundamentally capital-intensive. It relies on a fact about the existentiality of each human being, as well as the evolution of human beings as modernized at present, particularly. Even though this texturization reflects recognition of humans as labor-intensive, there is obviously the question of the domain of a flavor of linguistics. Is it a necessary condition or a sufficient condition, under human existentiality? The latter is correct. It is impossible to make the entire world nominalized. Factiously, human resources are capital-intensive.

（先に、労働集約的な人的資本と資本集約的な人的資本という事について触れたが、人間関係というテキスト自体が人（人的資本）を労働集約化するものである。本来的に人（人的資本）は資本集約的であり、それは、近現代における人類に至るまで人が進化した現在では特に、人が一個体一個体別個の生物として存在しているという事実に基づく。このテキスト化自体が人における労働集約性で鑑みられていると映るかもしれないが、要するに、あらゆる形での言語の領域を人の存在における必要条件と捉えるか十分条件と捉えるかという問題が在る。正解は勿論後者であり、世界の全てを言語化する事は不可能である。その意味で、人（人的資本）は資本集約的である。）

11:37 PM 9/25/2025

In general, as a natural result of a society, those marginalized by society form a faction. Israel's Netanyahu said that they do not reject those who are coming. However, there is an adequation of their recognition that implies not "being ostracized because of victimization" but "being a victim because of ostracization." Therefore, social existentiality on a victim does not refer to itself as a fundamental principle, as systemic racism, and secondarily, not primarily, it becomes a problem simply because of whether ostracized from the public or not. It is not substantial to recognize whether a victim belongs to the majority or the minority, and there, the transformation of the public issue into a question of deciding by majority vote stands for a kind of comprehension, as well as that of virtue. As French President Macron pointed out, obviously, the recent recognition of the Palestinian state is not relevant to antisemitism. Of course, "they" above are not equal to Jewish people, but "their fanaticism" concerns that of the Nazis as they know. There is no antinomy there, and Israel and terrorists are capable of obeying their hatred, harming each other, as long as the UN conducts a representation of the reasons why genocide takes place. The recognition by developed countries of the establishment of a two-state solution sparks further spurring. Recently, Israel has become terrorism itself, unfortunately. From the ancient period, perhaps Jewish people have been eliminated as proponents of war. The configuration, "them" and "not them," does not exist there, but "they" are a pure result of victimization. To resolve this problem, it is the only way to defy "their" history, but it is impossible because it involves more than just abandoning memorization. The Nazis proved the testament to it. Please keep going.

（一般的な社会の成り行きとして、被排斥者は被排斥者同士で徒党を組む。イスラエルのネタニヤフ氏は、「我々は来る者何者をも拒まない」と仰っていたが、彼らの認知原理として「被害者だから排斥された」ではなく「排斥されたから被害者である」というのが在るだろう。其処では、システミックレイシズムとしての被害者における社会的な存在原理が第一義として来る事というのは無く、只単に公から排斥されたか否かという事のみが二義的に問題と為る。被排斥者がマイノリティであるかマジョリティであるかという事はそもそも本質的な問題ではないが、しかし、其処では、美徳の問題と云っても良いが、公の問題を多数決の問題へと変換させて理解する事が成立してしまっている。マクロン仏大統領が指摘する通り、確かに今回のパレスチナ国家承認がイコールで反ユダヤではない。つまり、上記「彼ら」イコールでユダヤ教徒ではないが、「彼ら」におけるそれがナチスの狂気と同値である事は周知されている筈である。其処には二律背反の概念は無く、先述の通りのUNに拠るお膳立てに従ってイスラエルとテロリスト達は互いに憎しみをぶつけ合う事が出来、先進国に拠る二国家樹立承認に拠ってさらにそれには拍車が掛かる。つまり、現行のイスラエルはテロリズムそのものと化すしか無いのである。ユダヤ民族は太古の昔からそうやって戦争賛美者として排斥されて来たのだろう。「彼ら」と「彼ら」以外という構図は其処では成立しない。しかし「彼ら」は純粋な被害者として存在している。この問題を解決するには、「彼ら」の歴史を否定するしか無いが、それは記憶の忘却とは異なっており、それは不可能である。ナチスがその証左を作ってしまった。生きていろ。）

10:42 AM 9/22/2025

In the thesis of recognizing innovation as an extractive institution, it is pronounced as intensified by the socialist state, while people's homeostasis is referred to. It is impossible to avoid a decline in real wages solely through corporate efforts, as bureaucrats are inevitably hoping for no reduction. Elevating a labor-intensive society into a capital-intensive society is a development alongside human beings. It is not necessary to recognize labor for labor, and it is too natural to distinguish it from self-denigrating behavior. As I repeat it, living in human allocation is not the act of particular purposes. Bureaucrats may be guffawing, as they say, "Let's go together."

（イノベーションが収奪的であると見做す言説においては、人々における恒常性が取り沙汰されており、社会主義社会におけるそれである度合いが強い。実質賃金の低下を阻止するには企業努力だけでは無理というのは、お上の狙い通りなのである。社会全体における労働集約性が社会全体における資本集約性へと昇華されていくのが、人類における進化発展である。労働の為の労働は必要無く、それは自虐と捉えられて然るべきである。再度言及するが、人における生存とは特定の意志を纏った行為ではない。お上は、「貴方はそれで良いのです」と高笑いしているだろう。）

5:38 PM 9/20/2025




For instance, generative artificial intelligence can replace labor-intensive industries with capital-intensive industries, but the capital intensity of the whole society does not increase significantly in the short term. Of course, preestablished harmony, as a transformation of social systems, including the educational system, in the medium to long run, must be estimated occupationally in terms of innovation. If it is an extractive institution, it is opposed to the definition of innovation as the accomplishment of social penetration of technologies, and it is nothing but masochistic escapism that laments the current state of society. Elevating a labor-intensive society into a capital-intensive society is meant to be the way. There must be a conflict between labor-intensive human resources and capital-intensive human resources in any phase. The former is the left-wing ideology, and the latter is the right-wing ideology. The former differs from the latter in the conception of society.

Fed Chair Powell cut interest rates by 0.25%. He is going to persist in his stance, which relies on judgment based on economic data. The media broadcast the surrender of the FRB under pressure from the Trump administration, by the way. It might be possible to recognize the progression of the U.S. becoming a kind of socialist state as a result. As Italy's Mario Draghi spoke about "complacency," aside from that, the U.S. will be defeated by the counterpower of Eurasia, with China at its forefront. Almost everyone is aware of this. Therefore, the strategic location of the Westernized countries is not Ukraine but Israel. The West recognizes Ukraine as both emphasized and underestimated, alongside the significance of its conjunction with Europe. They recognize Israel as the existentiality of "to be or not to be," and if Israel falls into chaos, it will damage the West far more than expected. Now, the West is proceeding toward socialist states or is going to proceed to socialist states, and its national outline figures out as phenomenal as in the shape of war. Ukraine's resistance against Russia ironically describes the symbolism of the war in Israel, and Israel's fighting against terrorism exemplifies Russia's incursion into the West. As human beings are biological creatures, from this perspective at least, the identification of why war occurs is none of our business.

（パウエル米FRB議長が、0.25ポイントの利下げ。パウエル氏御自身は、あくまで経済データに基づいて判断を下したというスタンスを貫徹するだろうが、米トランプ政権に拠る圧力にFRBの独立性が屈したという一部メディアの報道も在り、ともかく、結果概としてのアメリカの一種の社会主義化の進行を見て取る事が出来るだろう。イタリアのマリオ・ドラギ氏の言及に関連して、ともかく、そうでないとアメリカは現在の中国を筆頭としたユーラシア国勢に敗れる。皆それを知っている。つまるところ、西側における現在の要所は、ウクライナではなくイスラエルである。ウクライナは欧州に接している分、重要視も軽視もされ得る。イスラエルは、"to be or not to be"のものとして見做され、陥落した場合の西欧文明社会におけるダメージは計り知れず、西側の社会主義化が進行もしくは進行しようとしている現在、その国家概略は戦争という形で勃発している。ウクライナのロシアに対する抵抗は、皮肉にもイスラエルでの戦争を象徴しており、イスラエルとテロリズムとの戦いは、ロシアの西側への進行を妥当化している。人が生物である以上の事として、少なくともその観点からして何故戦争が起こるのかという問いは愚問であろう。）

4:57 PM 9/18/2025




Against the person responsible for the homicide case or the accident, the deceased victim's relatives being angry and hoping for the judge or adjudicator to impose a severe penalty on the perpetrator remains a kind of lynching. It is accurate to recognize self-denigrating behavior under the concept of law in a rule-of-law state. However, this issue is not necessarily adequate, as long as the biological self-identity of human beings is maintained. It is easy to understand the case of committing suicide with mental anguish. When it is recognized that the reason for committing suicide by each individual exists, the death of each individual as the texturization is disambiguated. By the way, who can do that disambiguation? The biological self-identity is ignored there, and that suicidal solution is for the sake of granted self-denigrating behavior under the concept of law. Therefore, inadequately, the issue can remain the objective of lynching of the execution of lynching. As the right to life, which the Constitution guarantees, is just an existential contradiction, there is validity to the execution of lynching by the side of justice. As long as there is no identification of humans as biological creatures, the Japanese can be as incidental as a failure.

Let us abandon the delusion, which is too distinct to define. It recognizes human beings as fundamentally peace-hoping creatures, by the way. Is it a learned object through education? If so, it is possible to remove it. ......It is the way of humiliating human beings, of them, by them. There is no attribution of crime, but that of punishment.

（まず、人は、人とは根源的に和平希求的であるところの生き物であるという幻妄を捨てねばならない。それは後天的な教育に拠って植え付けられたものか？もし、そうであるならば、それを除去する事は可能だろう。…それが、人の、人に拠る辱め方なのである。属性化されているのは、罪ではなく、罰である。）

1:04 AM 9/18/2025




The UN proclaimed that Israel committed genocide in the case. If it is recognition or certification as socially effective through the UN, UN staff, as international civil servants, must directly go to the place where negotiation with Hamas terrorists occurs to get back Israeli hostages. If it takes place by the significant result, Israel is going to acknowledge its responsibility. In fact, if they go that far, as long as appropriate, terrorists try to murder them, no question asked. Why does the U.S. not abandon Israel? In the context of this occasion, terrorism is victimizing Israel, because. If the U.S. deserts Israel, antisocial spilling over takes place, the U.S. knows. In other words, and paradoxically, the UN might conduct a representation of the reasons why "this genocide" takes place. Israel recognizes Hamas and Gazan citizens under the same perspective, and the UN, without approving of genocide by Israel, is concerned, as well as Israel, without approving of the withdrawal of Hamas and Gazan citizens. It must be convenient for Hamas terrorists and inconvenient for the UN, with the principle of conduct of each faction.

There is a way to resist as self-deprecating as the weak. It is different from the death penalty imposed on the leader of the defeated side at the post-war settlement. In the same sense, a self-justifying explanation is none of one's business. It is a work of a man as a judicial problem. Weaknesses generally belong to all of something to texturize, while contemporaneous comprehension of the world, as mechanical, attributes the extreme shape of it. If there is subjectivity about that man, he could understand the given death just as the texturization there. The concept of "assassination," including committing suicide, is the fruit of the weaponry of the law. As Socrates said, "To know that you know nothing," it is too objective to ignore. There is awareness of knowledge of one's own ignorance, hopefully with him.

（弱者における自虐という抵抗手段。それは、戦後処理において敗戦国の将が死罪に処されるのとも訳が違う。同じ意味で、自己正当化の弁明すら何ら役には立たない。それは、人における、法廷における仕事である。弱さとは、慨して全てをテキスト化するものだが、世界をメカニカルに解明した気に為るのはそれの極致である。人から主体性が失われていないのならば、其処で与えられる死が単なるテキストである事を人は理解するだろう。自死も含めた「殺害」の概念は、法を武器化する事の産物だが、「無知の知」という言から学ぶ事はあまりにも多い。「無知の知の知」。）

2:30 PM 9/16/2025




The over-spec thing overthrown by the verisimilitude of the self absolutely causes a failure. Generally, in the context of statistics, there is a positive correlation between high intelligence and the amount of knowledge. In fact, intellectual capacity or cognitive ability is different from the amount of knowledge. Even if one knows something, it does not necessarily mean that the same one becomes wise. Thus, what is the wisdom of human beings? First language competence may be the most performative reflection of it. After all, humans become insane if they lose the verisimilitude of the self correlating with the recognition of the world. The actions of a foolish person substantively recognize themselves as crazy. It remains a versatile reason. As well as "mentally ill" or "anti-social," it advocates for themselves as labeled, once I explained.

In Japan, misconduct or impropriety by police officers, teachers, and healthcare workers, including doctors, is often enveloped in accusations. Of course, it is impossible to alter human substantiality through education, and it should be mentioned that enough is enough. However, there is equal access to opportunities. Therefore, the issue is contributing to the establishment of social institutions, including education. This texturization generally figures out the concept of state formation, but unfortunately, there is no existentiality in ultimate Japan. Needless to say, it is impossible to keep on going ahead of the country named Japan just with imperial lineage, and the social responsibility of Japan has been under the control of the U.S. since 1945. Recent China has acknowledged itself through the sense of both goodness and badness. They are trying to grasp "it" in the way of presuming "modernized socialism" by themselves. Exactly, they are proud of our folk as oriental. North Korea is not "modernized," and after all, they are defying it as their concept of state formation in conspiracy with Russia. What does this mean? It recognizes the conclusion of Japan, which gets ahead of itself with its pride. What does this lead to? Japanese people are being exaggerated, as long as they are involved in none of their business. That substantivity of salvation by the power of another’s vow strengthens the ordinary counterpower of the U.S. in Japan, by the way. Enough is enough. Russia mercilessly thrusts that factious thing against Japan. Russians say anything against the Japanese with the texturization of the biological self-identity. Remind us of the domination by Joseph Stalin.

（警察官や教員や医師を含めた医療従事者に拠る不祥事が後を絶たない。人の本質を教育に拠って変える事は出来ず、要するに、駄目なものは駄目なものとして扱えという事だが、機会平等性を奪う訳には行かないので、要するに、教育も含めた社会制度の敷設の問題という事に為る。そのテキストは、一般的には国家形成概を為すが、残念ながら本来的な日本にはそれが無い。皇統のみで国家日本を保つ事は出来ないのは言わずもがな、アメリカの管理の下でこの八十年間我々は社会を運営してきた。現在の中国は、良い意味でも悪い意味でも、それを分かり切っている。つまり、「現代化された社会主義」を標榜する事に拠り、彼らは、自力でそれを掴み取ろうとしている。確かに、彼らには、我々東洋人としての民族のプライドを感じる。北朝鮮は「現代化」されておらず、それどころか、彼らはロシアと結託する事に拠って、国家概としてそれを否定している。どういう事か？日本はプライドだけが先行して先走っているという帰結をそれはもたらす。どういう結果に為るか？日本の人々は自力の無さを標榜する様に為る。その様な他力本願の悪質さは、いずれにしろ、日本におけるアメリカの管理概を強化する事に為る。駄目なものは駄目、という事。その現状を日本に対して容赦無く突き付けるのがロシアである。彼らロシア人は、生物学的な自己同一性というテキストに拠って、我々日本人に対して、それについてのモノを云う。ヨシフ・スターリンの支配を思い出せ。）

5:41 PM 9/13/2025

Self-sacrifice is usually different from self-preservation. Of course, altruism could cause another person suffering. Regardless of the purpose of a decliner, it often should be said, "What a purpose for it!" The instinct for correcting diminishes the objectivity of an action. It is socially necessary to tolerate an action, including exaggeration, to protect oneself, if reluctantly. Still, this problem is not over in such an individual case. If it proposes self-preservation as self-sacrifice or self-sacrifice as self-preservation, there is the recognition of the war as phenomenal.

（自己犠牲と保身は相容れない筈である。つまるところ、自己犠牲精神に拠って他者が傷付くという事は在るだろう。其処に加害者のどういう意図が在るにしろ、「何様のつもりだ」と言いたくなる様な行為は有り得る。是正の能動が、行為の客観性を減免させる。言動も含めて、身を守る行動というのは社会的に必要なのである。只、これは個人単位の問題に留まらない。自己犠牲の為の保身や保身の為の自己犠牲が想定される場合、其処に現象としての戦争が見做される筈である。）

10:44 PM 9/12/2025

（国連人権高等弁務官が、イスラエルがガザの市民を「大量虐殺」と非難。では、殺した数が少数だったら良いのか？数の問題ではないだろう。該当事案を例えばナチスがユダヤ人に対して行った事と比べる事は出来ない。それこそ下卑た言い方だが、国連が言っているのは「風紀」の問題に過ぎない。人を同一単位の駒と見做し、自らの社会的立ち位置の誇示という「保身」に走っているのは、第三者群だろう。その偽善性は、無関心の一種であり、言及に余り有る。「他者の苦しみなど他人事だ」、彼らは皮肉にもそう云っている。）

11:15 PM 9/9/2025




Russian President Putin is absolutely dominant in thinking. Of course, there is the conception of a hierarchy in the society of human beings in him, obeying human superiority and human inferiority. Here, "superiority" or "inferiority" is not a byproduct of unification. May it be ambiguous, "a hierarchy in the society of human beings" is meant to be phenomenal. However, President Putin said, "Who does negotiate with terrorists?" and "I exterminate terrorists!", and these texts do not explain his unification of human beings. He is particularized, not by the sense of a strategist but by that of a tactician. As it should be the necessity of eliminating the human evil, it figures out the purgatory of Putin's Russia. Still, Russia is cosmos, and another is chaos, for the sake of granted Russia.

As it comes to the militarized self-protecting issue in Japan, it is necessary to dedicate the country to self-reliance. While the world order led by the U.S. reached its termination, at least in this context, the arms race has contributed from the beginning, as this self-reliance assumes a deterrent to war, reflecting China's military expansion, the threat by North Korea, and so on. By the way, having nuclear capabilities in Japan is going to be an issue, as it is too correct to mention, reflecting Russian sovereignty in Ukraine. The East, especially Russia and China, is necessarily committed to the solution. The conceptualized West is dictated or manipulated, and the U.S. engages with President Trump in contribution, as acknowledged. What a problem of "sooner or later."

（日本の軍事的な自己防衛力という場合、現在のところ率先して求められるのはその自立性だろう。これは、少なくともその面でのアメリカ主導の世界秩序が終焉を迎える中、中国の軍備増強や北朝鮮の脅威その他で鑑みると、軍拡競争に終始するかとも取れるが、戦争抑止力として働く事は間違いが無いだろう。その上で日本国における核保有といった事も議題に上るだろうが、ウクライナでの件におけるロシア概的教訓で鑑みると、それらは妥当であると云わざるを得ない。ロシアや中国は必ず「やる」。ディクテイトもしくはマニピュレートされているのは概念的西側であり、アメリカはそれを悟り切っているからこそトランプ米大統領を筆頭に立ててああいった挙動に及んでいる。それは遅かれ早かれの問題でしか無い。）

2:00 PM 9/7/2025




The evil is needed to control the self. Even though one loses self-control, one necessarily does not belong to evil. The more there is problematization of the issue as to what the evil is, the more this texturization itself becomes proof of the evil. Making someone gloss over, it is meant to be extremely tremendous. I do not correspond with it.

Under war, the more ambivalence there is about pursuing conformity, the more reluctant they are. Femininity in a woman, like Eva Braun, is too advocating. What makes them so? Escaping from the agony brings too much more pain, I guess. In fact, I do not have experience on the battlefield. What is adequate or satisfactory with the entity between ecstasy in an extreme condition and anything suicidal as an action? Everyone is dancing like a paranoiac. There is a dying attitude, but there is no dying message. Suicide solution takes it for granted until the moment of death.

（戦時下において悦楽を求める様態程能天気に見えるものは無い。エヴァ・ブラウンの様な女性における女性性は眼下余り有る。何が人々をそうさせるのか？快楽へ逃げれば余計に苦しい事は分かり切っているだろう。実際のところ、私は戦地へ行った経験を持たない。極限状態での快楽と行為としての自殺の間に佇むものは？どいつもこいつもパラノイアックに踊ってやがる。死に様というのは在るだろうが、死に方などというものは無い。自殺というのは、死の瞬間までが楽しいのである。）

4:35 PM 9/5/2025




Giorgio Armani died. I have poor eyesight, and I have worn Armani glasses made in Italy for a generation. This opportunity became a good reason for recognizing what the death of a human was. I usually do not belong to the sentiment like this, but another's death is so astonishing for me. In other words, I am seldom interested in the death of my own. Sometimes I deeply feel grief at another's death, but I think that there should be no person who becomes sad by my death. When I imagine the death of my own, I scarcely fall into something bitter emotion or sadness. Until now, I have lived so that, or I identify my life so that. At least in that sense, I recognize that I am healthy, mentally and physically, regardless of attributing my life expectancy to anything. Death is not conceptualized but contextualized. It is not a dead end. It is not salvation or deliverance from catastrophe. Every human leads a succession of daily lives and is fading away. Please rest in peace.

What a relation-making scoundrel. This is so-called "kidnapping." The victimization, "If a victim does not ignore a perpetrator, this perpetual victimization does not make sense," comes out in the scoundrel's logic. Ordinary citizens do not engage with anything like the mafia. Their motive is not frightened emotion, but social responsibility for a villainous group associated with bad conduct. Even though there is abuse of police authority like this, the police ordinarily represent the sense of not victimizing the victim and give it to the target. The Gestapo of the Nazis is easy to understand, for instance. In Japan, it is now allowed for the police to criticize a perpetrator of stalking without a report by a victim. The principle, "Do not discriminate against someone," which is not always correct, acknowledges almost all people. Here, the definition of being discriminated against does not derive from the degree of capability to do something as a human. As a certain degree of the spec as a human is nominalized, democracy is recognized as evil at present. The phenomenon of overdriving Israel is now representing global universality, as it is.

（悪党というのは、まずもって関係を作って来る。云わゆる「絡み」である。「被害者が加害者を相手にしていれば、（この）被害加害の関係は成り立たなかった」という構図を連中は当て付けて来る。普通は一般市民は暴力団の類のものの相手などしない。其処に在るのは、恐怖の感情ではなく、当該行為に及ぶ反社会的人間を是認しまいとする社会的意思である。例えば警察権力がこういった悪事に及ぶ場合、犯罪被害者を被害者扱いしないという構図を作って（それを常態化させ）ターゲットに当て付けるという事を行う。分かり易くは、ナチのゲシュタポである。ここへ来て、ストーカー加害者に対する警察に拠る被害者からの申告無しの指導が許可されるに至った。「被差別者を作るな」という原則が決して正解では無い事を、現在概ねの人々が知っている。ここで問題と為るのは、被差別者の定義だが、それは人としての能力の高低に拠るという事は無い。人のスペックの高低にそれを求めてしまう悪しき風習として、現在民主主義が嫌われている。現在のイスラエルの暴走は、それにおける汎世界性を表象している。）

6:24 PM 9/3/2025




As humans live with daily commodity luxuries are out of order, except if there is no assumption as a concrete lower limit. In other words, it might be accurate to satisfy particular people with only the minimum necessities of clothing, food, and shelter. When it comes to an elderly person or a person who has endured many hardships, a human with more pain is going to lose something to be longing for. It is said that homelessness exists in the U.S. Thus, there is a reason why there is victimization of racism, for example. As human beings are biological creatures, a kind of mental illness offers the philosophy of pain or hard luck. In fact, there are so many suicidal solutions linked to the mentally ill, and the existence of "the paradigm that is to be longing for pain" in a silly life determines that of substantiality. Of course, regardless of whether there is hope for it or not, that thesis should be the gravity toward death. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize the texturization as "mentally ill." Whether it is good or bad, it is the birthplace of modernized capitalism.

Whether the Nanjing Massacre existed or not, for example, "the Nanjing Massacre" is generally mentioned as a fact of mass slaughter in that place at that time, as it is the interpretation with "genocide" as the definition. Therefore, the rhetoric, "There is no Nanjing Massacre," is out of control, and it is necessary to understand the order, which forbids provoking victims' sentiments or being reluctant to recognize the rationality of human beings as defying a fact of mass slaughter. Once, as it occurred in that place at that time, it is essential to search for historical representations and sex, race, folk, and individual characteristics of each victim. Of course, people of wisdom leave a record of the fact, "Hier starben über eine Million Menschen, hauptsächlich Juden." Fortunately or unfortunately, the method of producing history is to be systematic.

（例えば、南京大虐殺が在ったとか無かったとか、一般に言われている「南京大虐殺」というのは、あの当時あの場所で行われた大量虐殺の事実を「大虐殺」として解釈付けしたものであり、「南京大虐殺」というのは定義である。つまり、「南京大虐殺は無かった」というのはレトリックの問題であり、其処で被害者感情を煽ったり逆に開き直って人とはそういう生き物だと「大虐殺」を肯定して見せたりする事に問題が在るという事である。上記あの当時あの場所で行われた大量虐殺という場合、歴史的背景や殺害された個々人の性別や人種や民族や個人的性向に至るまで、徹底して調べ上げられなければならない。だから、賢い人々は、「ここで100万人以上の人々、主にユダヤ人が死にました。」と事実記録を残しているのである。幸か不幸か、人類の歴史の作られ方は、その様に組織的である。）

4:40 PM 9/2/2025




The U.S. does not make the world unfortunate as it occurs. Once I wrote down, the U.S. is the representation of the world, and the opposite is not true. As if the biological self-identity of human beings is abandoned, the way of constructing the country called the U.S. in history does not annihilate the world. An anti-democratizing person immediately makes sense of a story as democracy as given. There is a distance from democracy about him, as he attributes the dead end of it, or as he conceives something unsatisfactory about it. Thus, his conceptual disregard of democracy makes sense of his unconceptualized paradigm, and this phenomenon consistently victimizes the U.S. As it is called socialism or socialism calls for it, how beyond description do the people as biological creatures intend to be?

With the U.S.-Russia Talks in Alaska, there is an opinion that recognizes it as a failure. At this time, did Russian President Putin abandon the guarantee of the right to continue the war from the U.S. Trump administration? That was not at all. There has been that guarantee from the beginning, if it had existed. Of course, it is impossible to bring a reason why white supremacy has contributed to it, not ambiguously, but sovereign power has been recognized. War is a phenomenon, and the texturization of human nature signifies it. Russia acknowledges the Westernized countries as themselves, and as an entity, it is perfectly separated from the West under recognition. Please imagine that there is no Russian Federation and there is no Fatherland. Take a look. Otherwise, how is a nuclear blast off?

（今回のアラスカでの米露会談について、不発に終わったという意見が在るが、プーチン露大統領が特にアメリカのトランプ政権から戦闘継続のお墨付きを得ているという訳では無い。お墨が付いているというのであれば、最初から付いている。其処でwhite supremacyを単純一義に持ってくるのは間違っているが、大国の思惑というのはそういうものだ。戦争とは現象であり、人々の生態をテキスト化したものである。ロシアにしてみれば、西側がその全てを担っている。エンティティとしてのロシアはそういう役割なのである。立ち位置というものが在る。彼らの土地も国家も無くなった世界を想像してみるが良い。有り得ない。さもなくば、核が飛ぶか？）

6:25 PM 8/30/2025




After all, this Japanese land is dedicated to itself as a part of the American Empire, the Japanese are ecologically exterminated, and that is finished. This plan is explained as, "Do not get yourself alone, but take yourself none." Nuclear blast-off can not apologize for Fatherland. The imperial system must continue. The Imperial household can not afford to help the bloodline of the subjects. In that sense, the Japanese Emperor must not get down at least.

It is not knowledge but information. It is recognized, in general. I think that utilizing my mind in vain is a kind of ruinous, and I am afraid of getting rid of knowledge in vain. At the moment of being misunderstood, I immediately try to explain what it was. Anything phenomenal to understand must contribute to not being abandoned. There is always a desire to get comprehension from another, inside of me. For example, it is not necessary to recognize the concept of "frequency," because exact identification by another does not take a risk in usual daily life. Therefore, in that sense, I believe in the rationality of each human. What a positive attitude toward the world, I guess. Physical avoidance must be adopted when it is under no persuasion by another, with a factor of anything known, or with unknown. Generally, objectivity recognizes rationality. The existentiality of the self is not to be conceived. There is a condolence toward myself.

（追求の対象が知識であるというと語弊が在り、これは情報というと正しい。私は、無駄な事に頭を使うのは労苦であり有害であると考えているので、知識の取捨選択には特に気を付けて用心している。誤解された瞬間、私は、即当該の誤解を解く為の説明を試みる。些細な事でも、あまり、誤解されたままで放置という事は無い。他者に理解されたいと感じる欲求については、私において恒常的に在るものである。それは例えば「頻度」という概念で捉える事は難しいだろう。それは、他者に正確に自分を理解されていた方が、社会生活を送る上でのリスク減免と為るからである。つまり、私は、その意味では、人の理性というものを信じている。その意味で世界に対して肯定的なのかとは疑わせる。そして、対象である相手に対する未知や既知の何らかの要因に拠りそれが通じない場合、物理的に回避するという選択を取る。理に沿って物事について考えていれば当該対象は自然と捻出されてくるものであり、自分というものがどうこうという事はあまり考えない。その意味では、私において自分というものは希薄である。）

12:01 PM 8/27/2025

12:36 PM 8/27/2025




Thus, since it is necessary to protect oneself in modern society, it is recommended to make not a whitelist of one's actions but a blacklist of one's actions. "We do not have to commit to a criminal action." Once one has decided on it, if one's action is calculated and will have been under accusation, one is not going to be specified or designated. There is a synonymizing of a motive for one's action with another, at a problem, but in that case, one should purge the entity, including suspected or suspicious others. In my case, I often rely on "the purgation with philology." At least, in this case of linguistics, there is a degree of being concrete or abstract in the language, but "it is out of order."

Their skin color is yellow, as if some of our friends recognize our skin color as white or black, on the other hand. Of course, as the word "on the other hand" is mentioned, it is the reflection of discrimination against black people by white people. Thus, there is harsh discrimination against the people whose skin color is not white, by the people who recognize themselves as white, regardless of their biological self-identity as the texturization. They often imitate the thought, the way of recognition, and physical perfection of their flesh, and so on, of white people. It is possible to replace all the genes of a person with new ones by gene therapy. Not only do genes anticipate the biological self-identity of human beings. Again and again, I deliver it as the texturization, which is not equal to genetic information. If there are people like the modern Japanese, who have lost it, the lost identity of a folk must emerge. Because of it, almost all of modern Japanese must be drunkards by imitating whites. This "drunkard" means something functional between the realization of the impossibility of becoming white people by themselves and the opposite of it. For instance, there is a recognition of me as the texturization of the biological self-identity of human beings as "a life row inmate."

（黄色人種の中には、自らを白色人種や逆に黒色人種であると見做し勘違いしている者が居る。勿論、ここで云う「逆に」というのは、白人から黒人に対する差別の現状を反映した文句である。つまり、自らを白色人種であると、そのものの考え方や価値意識や肉体の風貌等を真似する事に拠って、見做している者らに拠る非白人への差別意識は激しい。自己の遺伝子を全て改変してしまえる遺伝子治療が可能である昨今、遺伝情報のみでこれが判断される事は無い。私が何度も提示している生物学的な自己同一性というテキストはイコールで遺伝情報の事ではない。現代日本人はそれに該当するが、人々からそれが失われた場合、人々は民族的アイデンティティを失うだろう。だから、現代日本人の内殆ど多くの人々は、白人の真似をしてそれに酔うのである。「酔う」というのは、彼らの自己自身においてそれが叶わぬという事の悟りとそれの背理の表裏一体の示しについての文句である。例えば、「生存囚」として、テキストとしての生物学的な自己同一性を認められている私はそうは為らない。）

1:39 PM 8/23/2025




What do you recognize in your scenery? That's imitation. This understanding of your world gives you an objective perspective on the world. Thus, as there is literature, whether it is necessary or not, that argument may acknowledge itself as the denial of the existentiality of literature. Therefore, there is literature that has been lost to be read or will have lost its opportunity. This paradox liberates literature. It does not depend on the principle of economics, which declares "Supply and Demand." If there is a substantiality to argue whether literature is necessary or not, presumptive recognition is not needed, and you may equivalently exchange each literary product for money alongside the principle of "Supply and Demand."

Swatchが最近公開した広告でアジア人が釣り目を使ったポーズの画像が使用され、アジア人差別との批判。これはアジア人差別ではなく醜形差別のニュアンスを特別に感じる。前者が後者の十分条件であるというのならば話は分かるが。只、私は、釣り目というか目の細い流し目でも美形の人は居るとは思うが。

私は人の顔について、形状・人相・表情の作りの三要素で成り立っていると考えている。確かに形状が美形でも人相が悪いと顔としては醜いという事に為るだろう。逆に人相が良くても形状が余程不細工だと拙い顔という事に為る。目の細さがあくまでも形状の不細工さの十分条件という事は、無いとは思うが。

4:21 PM 8/20/2025

4:27 PM 8/20/2025




スイスが、ICC加盟国であるにも関わらず、ロシアがウクライナとの和平協議を行うのならば、開催地としてプーチン露大統領の来訪を受け入れると表明。ここで注目されるべきはICCの鼻っ柱。へし折られて久しいだろう。アメリカもロシアも、ICCには加盟していないから、先程の会談では関係が無かったが。