card

Earlier, I said "I am Jewish." This is indication against racism, which has been targeting me. This is not normal racism. Maybe it was before it, and since forty years ago the elimination against me was begun. Very brutal and malicious. When the Holocaust was indicted, discrimination or racism against Jewish people was historically structural. It was to be determined in advance, and they were living in anti-structural sociality inside it. Beyond it, existentiality of the Holocaust was to be indicating perfect crime against Jewish people. All is textualized against them beyond description. Watch it out, against Israeli people by media and the populace. As if witch hunt, a woman with strong sexual desire is to be sacrificed, by boiling water to be thrown. This is the answer, as cruel. Fighting against inhumane monsters with weapons, it is necessitated. Femininity of Jewish people remains of. They are also being sacrificed and becoming victims for humiliation. What a difference between human beings and other animals. It is worth thinking of.

（先に私が"I am Jewish."と述べたのは、私は永らく人種差別の対象と為ってきたという事についての示唆である。只の差別では無い。幼児の頃より四十年以上（それ以前からかもしれない）、かなり凄惨且つ陰湿なやり方で排斥された。日本人の日本人に対する人種差別。ホロコーストで鑑みれば、ユダヤ人に対する人種差別は歴史上構造的である。それは予め執り決められており、その中での非構造性の中で彼らは生きてきた。その上でのホロコーストの存在は、彼らに対する問答無用の絶対的差別を語っている。はじめから取り決められていたのだ。見ろ、イスラエルに対するマスメディアや人々の叩きを。まるで性欲の強い女に熱湯をあびせて魔女に仕立て上げて殺す魔女狩りの様だ。これが答えだ。敵の鬼畜共に対して武器を取って戦えという事だ。彼らは女性的だ。人を辱めたいだけの連中の犠牲に彼らは為っている。人と人以外の動物との違いを為すものは何か？よく考えられて然るべきである。）

10:20 PM 3/27/2026

There is hatred against the biology of human male. However, I am unfortunately human male. What is the answer? Human desire is unambiguous or univocal. If so, it is bothering human life, of course. If it is capable for human beings to delete it perfectly, human beings can evolve themselves into the next phase, and it is necessary for it to distinguish what desire is and what not desire is. After all, because human life is not infinite, there must be the question, "What does human sexuality depend on?" If there is no concept of desire, human female sexuality is to be recognized. Human female sexuality is precious and incredible. Please wait for her indication on purpose. Why don't you know the worst nightmare of murder or rape? What does this mean? There is an exact definition of "murder" or "rape." The wisdom of human male does not recognize it, and men should not touch women physically on purpose at least. Even though all women hate a particular man, and then, it is impossible for him to simplify his life. Human dignity remains of. The future of human beings is decisive for human female life, and if women decline it, that's the end. This issue explains the idea of sexuality of human beings. Human beings are different from other animals. Then, it is possible to understand difference between knowledge and information. Being adorable as sexuality is just a sort of information. What is subjectivity? Virtue is subjectivity. The word, "virtue," is worth recognizing, and transcribing is a sufficient condition for textualization. What is recognizing? I do not recognize Immanuel Kant.

（私はヒトのオスの生態を嫌いである。只、残念ながら、私もヒトのオスである。答えとして出て来るものは？ヒトの欲望は一義であるという事。勿論、そうである限りにおいて、それは少なくとも生きていく上で邪魔なものと為る。そしてそれを完全に消去する事が出来る様に為る事が、人類の次の進化の段階であろうと考えるが、それには、まず、欲望と欲望で無いものの区別が付けられなければならない。ところで、人の生には限りが在る。ならば、生殖行為は欲望に基づくものか？それを否定するには、ヒトのメスの生理を肯定する事である。女性の性は尊い。彼女らの自発的な意志表示を待て。分かるだろう、殺人と強姦が最悪の罪であるという事が。どういう事か？「殺人」や「強姦」の絶対的な定義は存在するという事だ。男性諸賢は絶対に自ら女性に手を出すべきで無い。男性から女性に対して物理的に触れるなという事だ。女性が一生近寄って来なかったら、それは只それだけの事だ。自信が在るというのは、そういう事だ。人類の未来は女に選ばせろ。彼女らが嫌だと言ったら、それまでだ。それが人の性。人は人以外の動物では無い。知識と情報は異なるという事がお分かり頂けるだろう。性的魅力などというのは、情報に過ぎ無い。「主観」という事がお分かりに為るだろうか？「美は主観である」。だから、私は日本語で美徳とか英語でvirtueとか云っている。文字化はテキスト化の十分条件だが、文字化というのは見本として必要なのである。イマヌエル・カントにレクイエムを。）

7:10 AM 3/26/2026




If there is the topology of recognition in human beings as creatures, do some kinds of language, as well as mother language, for example, make a given consequence unambiguous or not? What is "some kinds of language" here? The crime of red purge. One is easily instilled with it by another. This Apocalypse might not commit a crime. However, "one indoctrinates another." The answer is all written in the holy Bible, as if it is not necessary to recognize the doctrine of Original Sin. "I am satisfied with reading only the Bible," as one elderly person had said. There is no need of red purge, to be a sinner. Humans become wrong, as if it is necessary to become wrong. Human evil recognizes the state of the notion of "the crime of red purge." How long is this trial and error of irrationalizing of the consequence, and what? Insane blood causes distorted recognition as a matter of fact. Of course, I do not dislike other persons in general, depending on each individual. "Because I am to enhance insight into illness," so many persons are taking care of me. Because of it, human relationships are the best practical prescribing, I guess. In other words, depending on equalized distribution of opportunity, it is not necessary to commit racism, as "a distributed opportunity," like the Holocaust. That is an obvious proof of insanity.

There is no definition of "the healthy body." There is exactly the concept of insight, good or poor, and it is the same thing, as well as judgment by a doctor. This is not an issue whether another individual is trustworthy or not. Some of people are not to be treated as patients in order, and some of people are pouring too much money into overtreatment. ...There is mistreatment for reasoning violence against another individual as objective. In other words, there is no way out of the perfect denial of violence itself, but the recognition of human weakness is the perfect denial of violence itself. After all, each individual depends on approximate power beyond "law and order." In fact, huge wars take place across the globe as represented. It reflects human weakness. Does the social engineering take place, against what? Worshipping human weakness is. All is phenomenal.

（「健康な体」についての絶対的定義というのは無い。病識の概念というのは確かに存在するが、結局は人である医師が判断するという事では同じ事である。これは他者を信用するとかしないとかそういった問題では無い。人々の中には、病気を治療されない人も居るし、逆に過剰な医療に費用を注ぎ込む人も居る。他者に対する暴力を肯定させる為には何でも行う人々。逆に云えば、暴力が必ずしも否定される筋合いは無いという事だが、彼らは自分達の弱さを絶対に認めようとしない。結局、「法と秩序」（"law and order"）を通り超えて、力の在る者が勝つという事に為る。現に、少なくとも現在、全世界各地で大規模な戦争が頻発している。それは人の弱さの現れである、無論。事物の社会工学化の果てに、何が出るか？弱者崇拝。全て現象的な話だ。）

7:27 PM 3/24/2026




What a recognition of beautiful faces. Ugly face? My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and it is my weapon enough to laugh at. Bias of sublimation recognizes "beautiful faces." Envy or jealousy? Visualized opportunity in this broader sense of them recognizes his or her Narcissus. ...What a recognition! Self-contradiction makes sense then. What a dirty linking! Said "Fuck you.", he or she is to be adequate French. How lesser his or her creature is.

Enneagram's storytelling is. Recently the former FBI director Robert Mueller passed away. His Enneagram type is to be type 5w6, and his behavior and attitude were pale and sophisticated, as well. Mysteriousness was appeared to be. The cleverness of type5s is to delete social disadvantage in general. On the contrary, type2s are to delete social advantage in general. To tell the truth, there is no preference of type2. Type5's intelligence is to be represented phenomenally. It should be said as "socially" or "abstractly," but "being represented phenomenally" is adequate to understand. The notion of human resources' intelligence reflects sociality of human beings as phenomenal. This is a kind of texturization. Anything worth being paranoiac does not conquer sociality of human beings with one's identity. There is identification of each individual. Therefore, prosecutors work out, as long as socialism or the socialist state is under the notion of identification. They are able to have human society "identified" or "unidentified." If their works are to be defied, the Church is dignified. I am not going to insult the Special Prosecutor, and type5s are depending on the Church. "There are sinners in the center of the Church." Breaching of the law is not necessarily sin, and sin is not necessarily breaching of the law. Heinrich Himmler's Enneagram type was to be 6w5, and it is to be said that type6 is not the same of type5. Himmler did not have the intelligence like one of type5. He had explained their ethnicity as only the group, which had proved their superiority, and he had obviously committed social disadvantage or perfect crime. Earlier people are to be separated into two sides. What a disadvantage of the notion of gender.

（時々エニアグラムの話。つい先日亡くなったアメリカのロバート・モラー元FBI長官は、エニアグラムのタイプ5w6だと思われますが、まあちょっと同氏の御風貌を拝見するに、若干淡く且つシャープな感じがしますよね。ミステリアスな表貌は確かに読み取れる。ところで、タイプ5の人々の賢さというのは、概して社会的禍根を消滅させる所に在るでしょう。タイプ2というのは、社会的禍根を巻き起こすのが仕事である様な人達。私は彼らはあまり好きでは無い。で、タイプ5の賢さというのは、あくまで現象的に表象される。「社会的」だとか「抽象的」だとか云っても良いが、「現象的に表象される」と言った方が理解し易いでしょう。人的資本としての彼らが、その知的能力に拠ってその社会性を体現している事においては、現象的に表象される人のスペックというものがどういうものであるか「書き表されている」。テキスト化されているという事です。パラノイアックな概念に拠って占められている「だけ」の人々が、その自己同一性に拠って社会性を達成する事は無い。人には中身が在るという事です。検察官の仕事というのは、概して社会主義に中身を持たせる事。彼らは社会の概ねを良くも悪くも出来る。彼らの仕事を否定するのであれば、キリスト教的なコミュニティーに答えを求めるしか無い。ロバート・モラー氏を侮辱するつもりは全く有りませんが、タイプ5というのは概してキリスト教徒的な人々の事です。「キリスト教社会の中心には罪人が居る」。法令違反がイコールで罪であるとは限らないし、罪がイコールで法令違反であるとも限らない。ハインリヒ・ヒムラーはエニアグラムのタイプ6ｗ5だと思われますが、タイプ6はタイプ5では無い。ヒムラー個人に関して云えば、とてもタイプ5の様には賢いとは言えない。彼は、自民族の優等性を証明しようとしたのは自民族だけであると説明してしまった。今現在人々は二手に分かれている。どのように？それらに唯名するのは、余りにも愚かでしょう。）

12:24 PM 3/24/2026

In universal recognition, the more society is democratized, the more human vice is to be spilled over. It is misunderstanding to identify it as democracy, but it can be applied for only by the U.S.A. This is the historical reality or fact. Obviously, Japan is applying to it, as long as there is intervene from the U.S.A. to Japan. There is exactly the reason why management by the U.S.A. toward Japan, and almost all Japanese are capable of understanding it. Perhaps few Japanese are publicizing to favor human vice. As they are insane, it is worth delivering them without human vice as well as the recognition of substantiality of vice, and this is the reason why a noble person, like Saint Teresa of Calcutta, for instance, is recognized. Define the abstraction. The embodiment of theoretical proof is none of our business, or out of order. Please excuse me, this is theoretical, but not an irony. "Abstract", as the antonym of "concrete," is just one of the notion of concrete. As I said, I did not think of the antonym of "abstract" as "concrete." ...Life is suffering.

（汎世界的には、民主主義が推進されればされる程、悪質な人間達が悪事を働き易く為る。それが民主主義の正体であるというのは勿論間違っているが、それで上手く行くのは基本的な問題としてアメリカだけなのである。確かに、日本も上手く行ってはいる、アメリカの介入が在る限りにおいて。何故自分達だけでは上手く行かないのか、アメリカの管理概略に反発する連中は理解出来無い訳では無く、連中は「上手く行かない、悪質なのが良い」と云っているのである。これは特に日本において顕著に見られるが、悪の本質を理解せず云わば悪への自由を志向しているだけではまだ救い様が在り…それが例えばマザー・テレサの様な人物が奉られる由縁と為っている。理解出来るだろうか？抽象的に物事を考える事の大切さを。具体的な学理的証明など大した事では無いのだ。具体の対義であるところの抽象など具体の一に過ぎ無いだろう。何度も言うが、私は具体が抽象の対義語であるとは考えていない。…「人生は苦である」。）

5:06 AM 3/22/2026




The allergy to a woman. I am not being conscious of hatred for human female. However, I have grown up with misunderstanding of a woman, as an objective of hatred, since my childhood. Hatred has recognized me, alongside pleasure. I have untouched a woman, and only this decision has salvaged myself. There is no love inside me. Hatred has recognized me. If there is no discrimination against it, one can not defy a person who says, "You are discriminated(against)." ...Love is the opposite of hatred. ...Meanwhile, money is not dirty, it should not be said, but money is black. Almost all women do not recognize a happy marriage life without money. ...Life is suffering. I do not dare say, "Earning money is my pleasure." This recognition depends on exhausting, not on ideology. There is the concept of the margin of error.

Analysis of the script should be adopted as an issue. Now, hard copies must be sacrifices of replacement "fluently." After all, analysis of the script is to be none of our business. ...What happens? Intelligence agencies are to be depended on, or human females are being in danger. There is "the problem of embodiment." Will strict law enforcement take effect? Hey, the fool, there is the limitation. The rule of law is not socially almighty at least, as God only knows. In fact, Adolf Hitler previously worked, and he had prepared for a bad exemplification as "the political party for woman beings." ...Earlier it was said that Japanese intelligence was going to be established a few years later, and it was going to be provided with information by foreign intelligence agencies. There must be the phenomenal aspect of the objective. If it is ignored, human society must be a sufficient condition of the world.

（筆跡の問題。ハードコピーも自由自在にすり替え可能らしい。よって、もはや、筆跡云々も問題として執り扱われ得ない。そう為ると、どう為るか？各諜報機関に頼むか、ヒトのメスが攻撃されるかという事にしか為らない。「身が危ない」。厳格な法治国家体制が敷かれる？限界が有るわ、愚か者め。具体的法規事項の社会的能力にも限度が在る。その点、アドルフ・ヒトラーの功績は大きかった。「女性党」ナチスの悪しき前例を作ってくれた。…実際の所、以後立ち上がるジャパニーズインテリジェンスは、海外の諜報機関から情報提供を受ける事に為っている。当該対象の現象的側面。それを無視すると、社会としては、破綻に向かう。）

3:56 PM 3/21/2026

Life is suffering. It is recognition of livestock. However, human beings are not able to live forever. There is no need to eat the meat. "How do I eat the meat?" This is substantiality of human beings, however. There is no recognition of me, and I am in vain. Forevermore. If I do recognize, "I have already died."

Desire for sleep, sexual desire, appetite. There is no difference among them. Of humans, sleeping, sex, or having a food does not depend on cognition of it, and "desire for sleep," "sexual desire," or "appetite" is just the expression of the problem as far as conceptualized interpretation.

（人の生を否定する人々。要するに、家畜だ。しかし、人は肉を食らいながら生きる事は出来無い。よって自らの物理的子孫に希望を託しそれこそ当該的に生きていく人々。それが人類の本質なのだろう。…それでも私は、それを認めないがね。私はもう死んでいる。永遠に、分からないまま。それを手放す位なら、「死んだ方がましだ」。

睡眠欲、性欲、食欲、どれにも大した違いなど無い。人は、睡眠や性行為や食事を欲望に基づいて行うのでは無い。「睡眠欲」「性欲」「食欲」というのは解釈概略の問題に過ぎ無い。）

8:10 AM 3/20/2026




Bank of Japan established a new economic indicator, as well as expanding Core Consumer Price Index(Core CPI). Thus, this is on the purpose of explanation, and the issue is depending on whether this explanative indicator reflects conspiracy or not as well. It is not necessary for BOJ officials' way to be analyzed, and "markets' and politics' sufficiency against BOJ" is supposedly becoming a sufficient condition of everything any way. Of course, Bank of Japan is not a manipulator but an operator as well. This paradoxically explains the existentiality of stimulus toward laissez-faire, and if not so, it is just a proof of unsubstantiality of Japanese beings. In fact, Japanese society is now polarized. It is worth saying Japanese society as upper side or lower side, but it is also being indicated as multipolarity. Anti-social collective, not nominalized, is aiming at multipolarity, as nominalized, it should be said. Polarization is to be adequate. This is not perspective but conclusion, of course. However, this is the textualization of socialism in general. Each shape of society must be figured out as anything but nothing as well. It is plausible for the real nuclear blast-off to make sense.

Spring is here. At least, wage hikes of large companies, in Japan, are to be scrapping of SMEs. If the extermination of SMEs is performed, markets are to become monopoly or oligopoly, and socialism of Japanese society is entirely conducted, as well. After all, it is the hope for society with some of Japanese politicians, and the public stance of pursuing the U.S.A. by Japan at present remains of themselves. For instance, as if reorganizing society aimed at higher productivity or obligation to benefit SMEs from the revenue of large companies, it is no less than having Japanese society become the socialistic state, as well. Present bureaucracy in Japan concludes it as the relying on market mechanism and competitiveness, and is different from their attitude in the past. They bureaucrats are going to sublimate political manipulation into responsibility, but it is difficult for indication to prescribe market mechanism.

（季節的な話題を一つ。…少なくとも、この、日本における大企業の賃上げは、日本の中小企業に対する潰しかと思うね。仮に中小企業の淘汰が進むと、独占や寡占に拠って為される市場が増加し、少なくとも日本社会の社会主義化が進む。結局の所、それは日本の政治家の一部における望みでもあり、現在の日本のアメリカ追従には彼らの建前の側面も在るという事。例えば生産性を高める為の再編であろうが大企業の利益を下請けに流す法的強制力であろうが、それらはいずれにしろ日本国の社会主義化に他為らない。現在の官僚機構は、市場原理や自由競争を重んじ、過去のものとは異なっている。彼ら官僚も管理したいのは間違い無いだろうが、逆説的に、それは、市場原理も只では立ち行かない事を彼らがきちんと知っている事を示している。）

3:40 AM 3/20/2026

"If the rule of law is abducted, it is impossible to prosecute a war, and if the rule of law is not abducted, it is possible to prosecute a war." This saying is regardless of the situation by the enemy's invasion into the territory, and the abductor is also out of order, as they say. This issue tells constitutional limitation of a nation under the rule of law. I am to be suggesting it for a nation under the rule of law. It is accurate for each human, as a creature, to minimize the particularity as opportunity. Thus, the problem of recognition is standing for it. If he or she is hating the question of skin color, he or she can not reject the concept of risk, as well as a kind of perception or prejudice, for instance. If it is rejected, the existentiality of the nation under the rule of law is also rejected. The people in the primitive society resign. By the way, there is no concept of risk without an objective worth being a particular risk, and if there is the concept of risk at least, the primitive society is to figure out no notion, regardless of their established rules. Their direction is different from ours. If he or she understands it, it is indifferent to say that no fighting back is to be recognized as lèse-majesté against another individual. Whichever way is to be taken as possible. Being under the rule of law, it is not indifferent for international law, regardless of obliging or being obliged. However, it is irresistibly impossible.

（法律に違反するから戦争はしないとか、法律に違反しないから戦争をしても良いとか。敵が自国の国土に攻め入って来ても、法令遵守に則って、場合分けにて第一義の行動を選択するらしい。法治国家の限界。私はこれを法治国家の為に提唱している。人の生物としての特質がモノを云う機会をミニマムに持っていく事。要するに、認知の問題が其処で立ち上がる。物理的な肌の色がどうこうというのが嫌なのであれば、先入観や偏見つまりリスクの概念を否定しない事だ。それを否定するのであれば、法治国家の存在も完全に否定される。未開の社会に存する人々を見よ。リスクと為る対象を全く伴わないリスクの概念は存在せず、少しでも（その様に）リスクの概念を持ち合わせているのならば、彼らが形成する様な社会は其処にどういったルールが存在するにしろ存在しない筈である。最初から方向性が違うのだ。それを理解しているのならば、敵の攻撃に対して何らかの形ででも応戦しない者は不敬罪と見做されるだろう。法令遵守がそれに該当するというのであれば、国際法に強制力を持たせなければ為らない。しかし、残念ながら、それは不可能である。）

3:23 PM 3/19/2026




Against vessels trying to go through the Strait of Hormuz, Iran is now discussing the law enforcement to impose the canal transit fee, it is reportedly said. Now is wartime, and this way it is wise for this cognition to refer to. If Iranian cognitive function is to grasp energy prices, Russian influence from this point of view is to increase. The U.S.A. is to become capable of dealing with Russia to occupy Ukraine, to get rid of Iran, by themselves. Of course, it is better way than making humans starve at least.

Spring is here, and new life is coming in. Japanese elite private universities, Waseda, Keio, or Sophia, for example, intend to differentiate themselves with their traditional highly qualified education in English. However, it may cause lower substantiality of education as such, in private universities, rather than in national institutes. For instance, people who grew up overseas already have highly potentialized language abilities, and paradoxically, they can take for themselves granted or achieve high performance particularly in national institutes. Human society does not accept those who are obsessed by the relevant of one's academic background. Elite private universities are only contributing to strengthening one's previous social abilities with low efficiency, in that sense, and are not contributing to strengthening one's weak point as substantial. Universities and institutes are to be facilitated as educational, to learn something, and if you do not have the opportunities for studying, you do not have to be recommended to enter and graduate. Social characterization of each individual is none of our business, of human society.

（春という事で、新生活にまつわる話でも。日本の私立大学の最難関層の早慶上智辺りは、伝統的に英語教育で国立大学と差別化を図っている傾向が在るが、後者に比べて前者は教育の実質度合いが低下するという懸念はそもそもの問題として在る。例えば、帰国子女の人達は、既に高度な語学力を有しており、逆説的に国立大学へ入学して勉強した方がパフォーマンスが高いと考えられる。実社会へ出て学歴の肩書だけで通用する訳では無いだろう。最難関私立へ入っても、既に強化されている能力を低パフォーマンスで底上げするだけで、弱点を補強して自己の能力の質を高める事には余り繋がりづらいのではないかと考えられる。大学は教育機関であり、勉強する為に行く所なので、勉強する気が無いのだったら行かない方がマシですよ。社会的キャラ立てで実社会が運営されている訳では無いので。）

3:55 PM 3/18/2026

The issue was raised as the attitude of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in the Japan-U.S. Summit Meeting. How does she refer to the legal evaluation of the attack by the U.S.A. against Iran? Even if PM Takaichi has grasped all the factual things of that issue, she can not refer to, but she had denied it adequately. At least international law is capable of obliging none of enforceability to the sovereign nation. Japan can not take actions to be ignorant of the outline of the nation of the U.S.A., as if the political diplomacy of Japan, at present, and the "self-declaration" by the sovereign of government to be ignorant of the issue is just nonsense. Where on earth is the administrative of the world as the embodied government? What was a takeaway of the factual elimination from international society before WWⅡ? Because the conscience is to be reversed then, Japan is anything but a joke with the U.S.A. The dispatch of a destroyer to the Strait of Hormuz would be impressed by the U.S.A. President, Donald.J.Trump, as the taken pressurizer against Japan, but it is not supposedly, to be said. Japan is under examination, in fact. Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi says that there is no need to avoid incidents, to tell the truth, and it is appropriate for Japan to regard the relation with the U.S.A., or to regard the relation with Iran and so on. This abstraction previously indicates the attitude of Japan across the globe. Now is the war time, and it is necessary for Japan to determine, of the socially international sovereign, or the reverse is true. This kind of truth is not a sufficient condition of the judgment but a necessary condition of the judgment.

（高市早苗首相の日米首脳会談における議論題、外野から、「アメリカのイランに対する攻撃の法的評価について」。高市首相はそれについて否定しておられるが、仮に同氏が同件についての事実関係を全て把握していたとしても、言及し得ないだろう。少なくとも国際法には主権国家に対する法的強制力は無い。現状で鑑みて、日本は政治外交上の問題としてアメリカの国家概略を無視する様な言動や行動を取る訳には行かず、一国の国家元首がそういった事を無視して「自己」を主張するのは余りにも愚かしい。何処かに世界政府の様なものが在るのか？またWWⅡ以前の様に国際機関からの脱退を標榜するのか？今はそれらとは状況として真逆である。「だから」アメリカと上手くやっていくしか無い。ホムルズ海峡への護衛艦派遣について、トランプ米大統領はほのめかすという形で日本にプレッシャーを掛けてはいるだろうが、明言はされていない分、日本の協力度合は試されているだろう。小泉進次郎防衛相が該当の予定無しと仰ってはいるが、アメリカとの関係を取るかイランその他との関係を取るか、選択した方が良いだろう。その方が日本の立場を的確に示す事に為る。現在は戦時下であるとの前提の下、判断を下す所では判断を下さねば、日本の国際社会的立場という点では逆効果である。それは該当判断を下す事の必要条件であり十分条件では無い。）

5:56 PM 3/16/2026




Public opinion polls about approval rating for the Cabinet in Japan remains of. Of course, they are to be fabricated by Japanese media, with polls of decline as a result, as time goes by. It is easy for human collective under the particular purpose to conduct. There is no need to analyze it. A kind of fabricated atmosphere, alongside the purpose, is surely the same side of fabrication, and fabrication includes a human's free will. If the concept of risk is to be abandoned, this stands for nothing. In other words, if the concept of risk is not to be abandoned, this stands for anything. Of course, the notion of approval rating does not indicate social trustworthy. ...The concept of risk in the particular paradigm is just a risk, and the way of thinking, "paradigm shift," stands for nothing, there, if the existentiality of the permanent concept of risk must be rejected. There is prefect separation between the world standing for the notion of flow and the world standing for the notion of stock, in that district. For subjectivity of each human. The notion of approval is none of our business, but that of Nazi machines' business. It is not accurate to refer to the notion of responsibility, there, paradoxically. Machines are just waiting for order, and they are just out of order.

It is reportedly said that Iranian supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei was wounded by the military attack of the U.S.A. The U.S.A. is not going to exterminate the Iranian nation itself. Democratization of the Islamic Republic of Iran is immediately hoped for. Military attacks are a part of our consensus, ironically, and they are none of our business. Iranian people must IMMEDIATELY TAKE SOCIAL ACTIONS to grasp the nation in their hands with democracy. There is no reason why Shia Islam causes a panic, but if the people are to be obsessed by human rights violation or oppression, the consequence is one of the choice of their ordinary. Of course, the U.S.A. continues attacks against the regime in the form of recognition, because terrorists are vicious power of their existentiality by themselves.

（アメリカの軍事的攻撃に拠りイランで最高指導者のモジタバ・ハメネイ師が負傷したとの報道有り。アメリカもイラン国そのものを（社会的に）抹消する気は無いので、早急な民主化が切望される。要するに、空爆等の軍事的攻撃だけでは問題の解決に為らない。イラン国民が民主化を真に望んで妥当な社会的行動を起こすか否かという所に掛かっている。私はイスラム教シーア派に因を一義的に帰す気は無いが、民衆が人権抑圧を旨とするのであれば、それも彼らの選択肢の内の一つだろう。その場合、彼らは、西側特にアメリカの攻撃に晒され続ける。テロリストレジームはその存在自体が悪質であるからして。）

1:09 PM 3/14/2026




Picking a fight is obviously different from picking a fight back. The latter is none of our business. However, significance of the action of the former is purposefully clear. Of course, I am not a patient of paranoia. It is obviously said that Joseph Stalin was a typical patient of paranoia, and the U.S.S.R. under totalized Stalin was similar to the Japanese Edo era, as there is the notification, "the notion of para-," in English. The social control under the extreme socialism in the Japanese Edo era adequately remained of paradigm shift against the fact of the arrival of Black Ships. It adequately sounds, as social philosophy, but it is only a kind of conquering. ...When Lev Trotsky was purged, it was necessitated. Stalin was totalized, as the comrade, and he might consider Trotsky as the ignorance for the national conscience of Russia. Russian President Vladimir Putin is also the same side of Joseph Stalin. He is a right-winged person. An aid from Russia to Iran exists, as President Putin exactly said, and Jihadists and their comrades commit suicidal terrorism or not, as if the political super power acknowledges people of it. However, the U.S.A. primarily denies dangerous situations against their citizens, amid the plausibility of losing their lives. Sure. This point of view recognizes difference between terrorists and us. ...Their terrorism is to reject the textualization of the notion of category. That fake individualism, as if totalitarianism, retains the impossibility of far-right ideology with dependency on terrorism as far as far-left ideology. Please do not disturb, amid figured-out terrorism.

It is not necessary for me to be self-deprecating particularly as some kinds of humor. However, higher social status is not necessarily to prove superiority. Women know.

The idea of liquidity, as you know, should not exist as the concept of store of value or anonymity, for example, at least.

Nowadays young people are wise, and they are active on encircling private communities, for example. I do not belong to any community, and I am not old and middle-aged, as if young people and children must utilize myself, as it were, I hope.

（いたずらに自虐的に為る必要は無い事は承知している。只、社会的地位の高さが非下等の証明に為るかというとそうでは無い。女がよく知っている。

様々な意味での流動性は、例えば価値貯蔵手段や匿名性という点においては存在しない。

現在の若者達は賢く、例えばネット上では会員限定のコミュニティーを作って活動している。私は、何処のコニュニティーにも所属しておらず、老人では無く中年だが、若者達や子供達には適当に上手く使ってくれれば良いと思い考えている。）

10:49 AM 3/12/2026




There are people who are applicable to both the definition of gifted and ADHD or ASD, particularly called 2E or Twice Exceptional, in contemporary society. Proposition a theory, which adopts Thomas Edison or Albert Einstein, for instance, as a person of 2E, is appropriate, but each one is not a sort of early humans but a sort of modern humans. Developmental disorder is defined as a embodied medical criteria, throughout the periods, and it is worth confirming a patient applying to it. However, it is irrational to affirm themselves as 2Es, because there was no definition of gifted then.

As there is the description of sentences, there is no primary concern to words themselves. My mother language is Japanese, and I am not a native speaker of English and not a bilingual. If it is possible for my direct handwritings in English, online, to be identified, no one may become to be admiring them. Of course, I write down Japanese sentences as mother language with a pen on a notebook at first, and next I translate it into English. The logical structure of the sentences refines a problem of how to describe the embodiment of transcription from abstract texturization to formulation. In other words, where does the borderline between input and output exist in the figuring out? There is no extension of myself as a particular objective as an embodiment. Meanwhile, that abstract texturization is ridden by myself. Thus, it is possible to say that the texturization including the embodiment of transcription is under the territory of output. If the texturization is under the territory of input, it is possible to mention the perspective, which is on the extension of the self and out of order, as far as an embodiment. This is so-called brain-only-ism. It is a perspective of the world that only recognizes texturization as whole. There is no output and there is only input, then. Of course, this "brain-only-ism" is not correct as an answer. Thus, if there is only output as whole, what is recognition? There is nirvana. There is no notion of concept.

（文章を記述する際、少なくとも私は、言葉で考えている訳では無い。私の母国語は日本語で、私は英語のネイティブでもバイリンガルでも無く、ダイレクトに英語で文章を書くと過去にその様にネットにアップした文章で鑑みてもらえれば分かる通りあの酷い有様である。これは勿論ノートにペンでまずもって母国語の日本語で書いて、それを英語に訳している。書かれる文章における論理構造という事では、言語化材料としての抽象化されたテキストをどう具体的文字へと堕ろすかという問題は在る。要するに、インプットとアウトプットを区別する境界線は何処の場合で存在するのかという問題が在る。特定の対象である何らかの客体は私の自己の延長線上には無い。そして、テキスト化を行っているのは私自身である。つまり、記述された具体的文字を含むテキストはアウトプットの領域に有るという事である。テキストがインプットの領域に有るという主張は、何らかの客体が特定の自己の延長線上に在り公認されていないという見識を為す。要するに「唯脳論」の世界である。あれは全てがテキストであるという世界の見識である。全てがインプット、其処では。勿論、それは物事の答えとして不正解である。では、全てがアウトプットだったら？其処は涅槃。概念というものがそもそも存在しない。）

9:16 AM 3/10/2026

12:34 PM 3/10/2026




"Men are all the same." Women are screaming. I determine that some acts are to be defined, not of should-be act...and I have no friend. Thus, sometimes a woman is to get involved by myself, and I am to be walked over. ...Either way.

"Do not believe in it."  As definitive, doubting something is just believing in anything as a result. ...Body communication? That's awful. It is too silly to laugh at. That body communication is not necessitated by logical structure, because it is not language. ...As artificial intelligence is technologically innovated as well, for example, PEOPLE ARE NOT DEMANDED AND SUPPLIED as laborers, at least, because the notion of labor power is to be deleted from human society earlier. ...Socialism is to be coming, again and again. The next is to be awful. ...Why don't you recognize the next stage as being slaves? Livestock. The next is being gushed. Not possible to have. This is a warning, and as Japanese, at least, do not eat foods of animal origin. For example, soybean products are derived from acknowledgement by our ancestors since ancient Japanese era. Annihilated, grieving, and depending on being pleasant with having meat of animals, they are nothing but being insane, I guess.

（「信じない」事の大切さ。敢えて定義するならば、「疑う」というのは疑った結果を信じ込んでいるに過ぎ無い。…体で分かり合える？痛々しいね。「（笑）」を付けるのも憚られる。その「ボディランゲージ」は、言語では無く、論理構造を必要としないだろう。…人工知能の流布をはじめとした様々な技術革新が為される昨今人々の手から労働需要どころか労働力の概念自体が奪われ様としている。…また社会主義の再来だ。次はおぞましいぞ？…奴隷の次が何だか分かるか？家畜だ。その次は排泄物。食えない。それで終わりだ。悪い事は言わん、少なくとも日本人の立場で在りながら、家畜の肉を食うのは止めておけ。例えば大豆加工食品というのは先祖伝来の古来よりの日本人の知恵だ。辱められて泣き喚きながら喜んで肉を貪り食らうあの連中…私にはあの生き物は気狂いにしか見えない。）

1:11 PM 3/9/2026

5:46 PM 3/9/2026




It is statistical to be proven, as the pressure recognizes obsession toward one's conduct. Human weakness reveals its bias, from input to output. It is important for the speed of thought to be proven. Regardless of series or parallel, as a problem kids and women depend on its weakness. If one is wise, he or she works well. However, human intelligence remains of marginal productivity or revenue as socially as possible. Furthermore, it is necessary for ability and its personnel to approve consequences, in spite of the existentiality of intelligence. In ancient period, this was to be recognized as the cause of war, and intelligent individuals were summoned onto killing fields. The word, "a corporate workaholic," reflects the way of social programing as well. If one does not have no insight for this commission, he or she is to be avenged as dramatically as ironical. The opposite of the existentiality of soldiers do not depend on its wisdom or intelligence. Please understand it. Each social situation needs each output, and it is necessary for one's conduct to be proven. As phenomenal, we have a risk of being recognized as insignificant creatures. In nature, there is human evil.

U.S. President Trump demands unconditional surrender against Iran. If Iran does not accept it, their nation will be exterminated physically. Masoud Pezeshkian, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, must understand the situation, in particular. "Iran is not capable of defeating the U.S.A." President Pezeshkian is not going to accept the offer of unconditional surrender, because he is now under pressure from below particularly with a kind of an upper blow. The resistance, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and hardline conservatives, for example, recognizes the surrender as betrayal. If so, the Iranian President will be supposedly murdered. There is the risk of it. Of course, President Pezeshkian is to be utilized by the resistance, because the resistance is acknowledged by this unconditional surrender to the U.S.A. as the end of their lives and activity. War is not primary purpose of the resistance, but they want to prolong it. White House estimates the operation Epic Fury/Roaring Lion drugging on for 4~6 weeks. The U.S.A. does not definitively accept whatever, if it is not to be advantage with them. So, unfortunately, Iran has to choose how to be defeated as the nation. As there is the extreme condition for Iran, the democratization of Iran is not a sufficient condition for the existence of the U.S.A. as the nation.

（トランプ米大統領はイラン国に対して無条件降伏の要求を突き付けている。イランは、それを呑まなければ、物理的に壊滅するだろう。同国のペゼシュキアン大統領が状況についてきちんと理解しているのは間違いが無い。「イランはアメリカにはほぼ確実に勝てない」。同氏が無条件降伏に公式に同意しないのは、同国内における下部の抵抗勢力にアッパーされて突き上げられているから。革命防衛隊や保守強硬派は、降伏を裏切りと見做し、その場合ペゼシュキアン氏は命を落とすその他のリスクが有る。抵抗勢力の彼らも、アメリカへの降伏は、自らの死を意味する為、要するに、ペゼシュキアン氏を利用している。彼らは、戦争を第一義的な目的としないながらも、それを長引かせたいのだ。ホワイトハウスは、このthe operation Epic Fury/Roaring Lionが4週間から6週間続くとの見通しを示している。アメリカはアメリカ国の利益に為らない事は受け入れないので、イランが国家としてどう折れるかが問題。極論すれば、イランの民主化はアメリカの十分条件では無い。）

6:32 PM 3/8/2026

The story of Enneagram is continued. The sense of vitality concerning type 7 is significant. For instance, a type 7w8 woman is frank, rather than a type 7w6 woman is splendid, I guess. Both have characteristics of the "dry." It is different from "severe." A type 2w1 person is far more than severe. Type 2w1s are degenerated by a type 8w7. Don Richard Riso, a famous Enneagram researcher, are finding out, as if degeneration of type3s as psychopathic, sometimes, but there is recognition of degeneration of type8s as psychopathic, as adequate. When a type8 person degenerates, he or she is adequately to degenerate into being psychopathic, in other words. Type8s are under notification. The existentiality of them is to be exemplified. The more a 7w8 person is dismissed by "being notified," the more a 8w7 person is dismissed by "notification." Type8s are different from "dry" of the type7s, and they are dry + cool + severe = savage. Being savage, people can abstract it away. Alternative. The alternativeness is objectified by itself. However, it is easy to understand by the diction, "the notion of para-." Nevertheless, it is to be said that their body awareness must be notified. This is not ironical expression, and in fact, they are so existential and have a very strong physical as well as individual. The type7-winged or the type9-winged is to be "telling the truth" of being strengthened, or the substantial type8 is to be recognized only by "the notion of para-." Meanwhile, they are creatures of embodiment. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and my Enneagram type is 4. Not at all.

（エニアグラムの話。続き。タイプ7の生命力感には、目を見張るものがありますね。例えば、タイプ7w8の女性がサバサバしてる（frank）のであれば、タイプ7w6の女性はサラサラしてる（splendid）、とでもいったところでしょうか。どちらもドライ（dry）である事には違い無い。彼ら彼女らは、シビア（severe）というのとは違います。シビアなのはタイプ2w1。そのタイプ2w1を統合の方向に持つタイプ8w7の人々。エニアグラム研究者のリソ氏は、タイプ3にサイコパス的要素を見ている様ですが、私はタイプ8の人々が分裂の方向へと傾いた場合そういう局面が招かれ得るという事なのではないかと考えています。タイプ8の人々は、目立つ事が当然である様な存在。その存在感は非常なものが在る。「有る」のがタイプ7w8だとしたら、「在る」のがタイプ8w7とでもいった所でしょうか。タイプ8は、タイプ7（ドライ）と違って、ドライ＋クール＋シビア＝サベージ（savage）でしょう。野生という事においては、やはり人はそれを捨象し得る。「どちらか」という事です。その二者択一の選択肢自体も対象化される。英語で"the notion of para-"と言ってしまえば分かり易いですが…。ともかく、彼らのその身体意識は目を見張るものが在る。実際、肉体も剛毅で、物理的にも凄まじい存在感を放っている人が多い。その、強さを「語る」のがタイプ7とタイプ9の両翼だとしたら、強さを「放つ」のがタイプ8でしょう。いずれにしろ、彼らは体現している。あ、私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）はタイプ4ですよ。悪しからず。）

5:14 AM 3/8/2026

The utilization of online environment depends not on anonymity but on remote control capability. Of course, it does depend on a fact, which reflects visualization of monitoring system, of a smartphone or a PC, for example. In other words, only as an environment affording offline human relationships online environment is trustworthy. Online one is filled with higher specifications, and it is worth being cautious for. Otherwise, a bad act is to be punished. If the particular social collective is figured out, as long as it is humane, there should be an antinomy of war in general. In other words, the notion of contradiction is to be abstracting surveillance away. Meanwhile, there is no ignorance of it. A person is to be ignorant, or not to be ignorant.

（オンライン環境の利便性は、匿名性には無く、その遠隔操作性においてのみ在る。つまり、PCなりスマートフォンなりのそのモニターに何が映し出されるかの問題でしか無いという事です。どういう事かというと、オフラインでの人間関係における補助ツールとしてのみオンライン環境は価値が在るという事。勿論、オンラインの補助ツールとしてのスペックはすこぶる高いですよ。その分、注意が必要という事。つまり、悪い事やってると捕まります。仮にそれが為され無い程に特定の社会的勢力が形成されてしまった場合、其処には戦争のアンチノミーが存在する。どういう事かというと、概念としての二元論が抽象的に妥当する。無視出来無い。無視されて然るべきと考えている人は無視されるでしょうね。それについて無視出来無いと考えている方は無視され無いでしょう。）

9:05 PM 3/7/2026

To be honest, psychiatrists are to say, "Choose the one of, the goodness or the badness." Depending on pharmacological actions, drugs are taking effects, as spontaneously as different, if there is no intervention by the third party objectives on purpose. I am not to be acknowledged of the embodied situation, because I am just a patient, particularly with AI-powered drug discovery. However, becoming the one of the goodness, the disease as my patience has to be acknowledged by the perspective of medical science to me. Regardless of the will of a psychiatrist, patients are obsessed by the obeyance with consequence. "The truth is in the pudding." Treatment is including the meaning, and patience means out of order. Psychiatrists textualize existentiality of social stratification. It is not exposing of the idea of socialism, but they are going to avoid extermination of society, by themselves. "There are also vicious persons." In this sense, I am to synthesize with psychiatrists. As this society is to be infected by "Nazi Patients," there must be elimination of devastation. Vice is being testified, in front of virtue. For the existentiality of human beings, the notion of value with psychiatrists are reflecting everything, as it were. Once and for all, it is said, "I am your personal enemy." What a joke. The enemy is an enemy. We must be recognized in the future. There is the idea of society. There is no denial of the phrase, "I respect you.", but hypocrisy must be exemplified. As they determine, psychiatrists are taking it for granted, with the other words. Depend on you.

（はっきりと正直に申し上げます。精神科医の先生方は、「悪化するか良化するかどちらか選べ」と仰っている。薬効で鑑みるに、クスリの内容は明らかに変化していってる。サードパーティからの干渉が無ければ。AI創薬の類が言及されていますが、具体的な詳しい事は私にはちょっと分かりません。只、良化するには患者としての自分の病気が、特には精神医学上の見地からして、どういうものなのか知らなければならない。それが精神科医の先生方の本意であろうが無かろうが、それに従うしか無い。後は実力勝負だという事です。治療という事にはそういう含意も有る。彼らは、社会的階層の存在をテキスト化している。それは社会主義性の露呈とかでは無くて、彼らも彼らで社会の悪化を避けたいという事です。「悪い人間も居るのです」。その点においてのみ、少なくとも私は精神科医の先生方と同調しています。ナチのブラウナー共が蔓延り悪事に及ぶこの社会で、奴らをどう始末するかという事は、美徳が悪徳に敗北するか否かというお試に文字通り遭っている。それは人が人として生きる為の、少なくとも精神科医の先生方に拠る、価値概念を反映している。"I am your personal enemy."？笑わせるな。戦え。敵は敵だ。我々人類が生きて先を切り開いていくのはそういう場所だ。社会。"I respect you."の文言を否定しろとは言わん。しかし、偽善の概念は充分に知らしめられなければならない。精神科医の先生方は取り敢えずそれを教えている。）

4:59 PM 3/7/2026

A pair of stretch jeans is too comfortable to wear...

The product planning relies on a Japanese manufacturer. BEEN BLUE urban label.

（このストレッチジーンズ、履き心地良過ぎ笑った…。

日本のメーカーが企画してる、BEEN BLUE urban label。）

4:03 PM 3/5/2026




I bought it.

When there is a criticism as an objection, it is adequate that its indication has to be concrete. However, except if it is necessitated to execute another or homicide is fortunately necessary, there is no need to reason the act. Why don't you recognize the perfect necessity of being starved? By the way, a kind of right to life is just a definition, and utilitarianism, utilitarian philosophy by Jeremy Bentham, for an example as the famous, ignores equalized distribution of opportunity. Irreversibility of human will can not be proven, because it is impossible for humans to make a decision after his or her death. Regardless of justification of execution or homicide, it is possible to define the existence of embodiment of the rule of law against the anticipated murderer. However, there is no authorized power in the rule of law in advance. If not so, there must be perfect absolution for the rule of law. Every empowerment of the law stands for taking effect of the death penalty against breaching it. The law is just a kind of textualization and the social contract, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as the famous, for example, is the same. However, it is common sense, not textualized. If not so, it may be pleasant, as long as it is the act of foolishness. Thus, if the existentiality of individuality is denied against each objective as individual, logical structure in general is also denied, or not to be. Even if human beings as biological creatures is instrumentalized with anything of devices, of the same consciouses, the deliverance is to be believed in. The idea of categorization must be denied as a result. If not so, you can live in the material world, being tremendously another dimensional.

（物事に対する批判が、その指摘において具体的でなければ為らないのは当然である。しかし、例えば、他者を殺傷すべきで無いという事について、その根拠を提示する必要は無い。何故「自分が殺傷されない」事の必要性が絶対的に存在するのか？ちなみに、生存権の類は単なる取り決めであり、功利主義は人における機会平等性を無視している。意志の不可逆性というものは証明不可能であり、何故ならば、人は死後に物事の判断を下す事は出来無いからである。殺傷が正当化され様がされまいが、人が殺傷される可能性は当該の具体的法規事項の存在とは関係無く存在する。法に本質的な具体的拘束力は無い。それを否定する立場は、法に絶対的権限を付与するのと同じ。その場合、どんな法であれ、違反したら即死罪という事が成立してしまう。その意味で、社会契約論というテキスト化はナンセンスである。それはコモンセンスである。コモンセンスをテキスト化するというのは、楽しいかもしれないが、愚昧である。ところで、人が個々の対象として存在する事を否定するのであれば、事物の論理構造そのものが否定されているという事に為るだろう。仮に生物としての人に何らかのデバイスが組み込まれていて意識が共有されている様な事が在っても同じである。それは（概念としての）当該カテゴリーそのものが否定されるという事に帰着するだけである。それも否定するのであれば、単なる三次元のマテリアルワールドで呆けているが良い。）

11:20 PM 3/5/2026

Because I am a man and heterosexual, I ordinarily love a girl. I do not hate a woman. However, I do not want me to be addicted to a seductive one. There is extraordinarily high risk about the occasion, as socially or biologically, as well as an individual. I have been not to be associated with a woman, who is making a pledge to marry or becoming a kind of friendship with me. In other words, as there is recognition of risk about it, there is to be call of duty to exterminate that kind of addiction, absolutely, inside myself. So I am going to behave the conduct of hatred against an objective, concerning addiction, on purpose. Of course, I am capable of making sense, alongside another person, to keep a proper distance. However, I am always trying to abstract the notion of human relationships away, to exclude the notion of risk. Obviously I am missing out, by it, and human relationships are consciously recommended to be better than being out of order, I guess. ...My love affair is prohibited, I definitively define. This kind of thing is truly obsessing. There is a sort of identity inside me, which recognizes the assigned identification of myself, not to be intervened by a pretty woman. This is the prohibition. How odd I am to be. Nothing but being meaningless. I can not help being affordable for avoiding the relationship between a beautiful girl and me, and please do not disturb. I am not trustworthy, particularly for women, I guess. Not at all.

（私も男性で、ヘテロセクシャルだから、普通に女の子が好き。決して女性を嫌いな訳では無い。只、他者、特に性的魅力の有る女性に対して、アディクションを起こしたく無い。それは生物の一個体としても社会的にもリスクが高過ぎる。異性との交際や結婚なんて考えた事も無い。しかも、それをリスクと認識する以上、徹底してそれを排除する義務的能動が自分の中に生まれる。だから、故意にアディクションの対象に嫌われる様な行動を取り得るという事だと考える。私だって他者との距離の取り方位弁えてる。只、リスク排除の為にそれを壊すという形で関係の概念自体を捨象してしまうという事。明らかに損してるのは分かるし、他者との交友は在った方が良いに決まってるという自覚意識も有る。だけど、「女にモテてはいけないであらねばならない」みたいなね。正直辛い。女の子に干渉される自分が在ってはならないという自己同一性みたいなものが自分の中に在るのが分かる。気持ち悪いよね。いや、私がね。だけど、しょうがない。私自身もそういった相手との回避努力は行ってるんで、特に奇麗な女の子にはあまり近寄らないでくれとしか言い様が無い。私みたいな男、特に女性にとってはどうでもいい筈。駄目かい？）

9:05 AM 3/2/2026




Unfortunately, it is possible to differentiate personality traits of humans. Phycology is good at this, for example. If the phrase, "It's on you.", is predicated on a judgment, there is no problem. Regardless of the possibility of adopting an objective, autonomy depends on existentiality inside a person, because. As a bad case, social dignity is to be authorized, when a person is recognized as a perfect judgment, which is not capable of being rejected, with only a judger's opinion or perspective. Like a seductive coming. However, if there is only a judgmental thing, it is not violence to be manifested as a problem. In other words, the problem is the idea of that social dignification. Anti-social power is to be labeled as well as its dignification. Thus, the labeling of nominalized "anti-social" is equal to empowering such human collective "not as anti-social." This problem is to be solved, as long as it is abstracted away pan-socially as "conducted understanding." It is impossible to abandon it as the notion. It is to take effect as a vaccine. The way of textualization is recommended, and to transcribe is much more to do. The CIA said, "Data is intelligence." Being suspicious is remaining of. Including oneself, it is different from doubting or believing in. A result is not necessarily an answer, to remain. There is difference between chaos and cosmos, but this is another story, unless humans are not creatures. Humans are not principle of being programed as well as existentiality of artificial intelligence, for example. There is the notion of "counter-representation" as textualized.

This is a caution about hacking incidents and cracking incidents, particularly online. Because they are endless and there is no end in sight fundamentally, ignoring is to be recommended. However, the enemy attacks a victim as well as synthesizing a particular action of a victim. Regardless of the existence of the enemy inside a victim, the enemy attacks a victim relentlessly. Of course, the enemy have to be canceled as a noise. This is common sense. For instance, there are friends in SNSs, but sometimes malicious emails disguising legitimate emails are coming into the victim's territory. If a noise is once textualized as "a noise," there is risk of canceling anything but a noise. This textualization is meaningless, and the capability of judgment is only to be depended on. The concept of capability is only to be independent. The substantiality of a matter is to be. Thus, digital technologies are dangerous, to be depended on, as this capability is to be diminished. For instance, when a victim is just to open a legitimate email, at the moment, "the pretext is successfully established." This is a judgment by the enemy, and this is the most effective way to utilize an attack for the enemy. "It is not necessary for a victim to utilize recognition of the enemy." A victim has to be conscious of this, as being important. The case of deepfakes by generative artificial intelligence is the same. There is indifference within what no relation with a victim's body is. The primary purpose of the enemy is fabricating a fake relation inside a victim, to damage.

（少なくともネットを利用するに当たっての、ハッキング被害やクラッキング被害について。基本的には相手をしているとキリが無いので、無視する事。しかし、敵は、被害者の特定の行動に合わせて反応をしてくる。敵は、自分の存在が被害者の中で完全に消滅したと感じても徹底して攻撃してくる。つまり、敵はノイズとしてキャンセルする事。これは常識。例えば、SNSにはお友達も居るので良いですが、正規のメールを装った悪質なメールも多々来る。どういう事かというと、ノイズをノイズとしてテキスト化すると、今度はノイズでないものがノイズとして処理されてしまうリスクが在る。そのテキスト化は無意義なので、自分で全て判別するしか無い。自分の判断力を頼るしか無い。物事の内容で鑑みて判断する事。要するに、デジタル技術に頼りっ放しだとその能力が減免されて危険だという事。例えばメールだと、当該メールを開いた瞬間に「因縁付け成立」の判定を出して攻撃をしてくるケースとかね。其処の所に敵は効果的な攻撃として干渉してくる。「敵の価値承認は求めていない」とはっきりと自覚意識を持っておく事が大切。生成AIのディープフェイクなんかについても同じ。自分の身と関係が無いものは関係が無い。其処に関係を作らせて被害者にダメージを入れる事が敵の狙いなので。）

1:18 PM 3/1/2026




Once upon a time, one Jewish person said. "Whoever does not notice laborers who only work." I am the same of him in the sense of treating them as mobs, ignoring each individuality of them. "I do not notice them, too." They do not hope for being noticed. Being born without their purposes by the seductiveness of parents, they are associated with me, as they consider their lives as no worthy. This issue is a sufficient condition of their sociality, and I also do not regret my social existentiality by myself, thus. I am different from them, because I am to be appreciated with my self-dedicating actions by the third party. It depends on recognition of the principle of action with the third party, and laborers do not intend to act so and are determined as social objectives who are participants not to be recognized as a result. They are to be exterminated socially, and they are to declare "the March for Life" on the street in vain, because they demand themselves as a mass of corpses of their existentiality. Just being decayed. It is the dead end of their conception of desire to obey. My this perspective is paranoiac, or their social existentiality is to be paranoiac. My self-dedicating actions are just textualization. They do not do this. I am not to be acknowledged by the factor of it. I am not them, because. Joseph Stalin had called authors "engineers of the human soul." Recognized as the way of being treated as laborers with him, the conception of human collective does not indicate laborers, as "engineers of the human soul." Equalized distribution of opportunity had been to be kept in the totalized Joseph Stalin of the U.S.S.R., exactly, as far as society to be governed. Even though human collective strongly do hope for being chanted by the spell magic of reincarnation, they are only capable of purchasing society by their sociality. The statement of "no need" for them as creatures continues to remain. Their existentiality claims. This cruel déjà vu is to be familiar with their lives by itself. They are facilitators of the phrase, "Life is suffering.", ironically.

I took a coffee, last time. I recently do not drink at all, but there is no concern of telling the truth, except if I remain not of being drunk. "When the chilled Tofu of the solid is to be coming in, blacked out salty thin colored raw Shoyu is going to be taken down alongside my thirsty cannibalism." Thus, there are some of the particular girls, who are looking forward to having me on. I am not a playboy. However, they are publicizing girlish seductive coming, for me, "We're the bad ass." So exhausted Cherry Blossom is taken care of, by the irritation. I can control myself. Don't say being good at emphasizing, "This is the therapy." I guess that she says me of the gushed piggy middle-aged bolden of the silliness, behind my back. That tempt is anything but becoming out of order. The sexual or seductive of the femininity of a woman is only the phenomenal, I am to inform. So I am to go crazy, if a perfect Jester on the stage. ...Paranoia of that girl is falling into love. Do you love me? So funny? This is my life.

（先程コーヒーをまとまって飲みました。最近はお酒は全く飲まないんですが、ちょっとそういう気分の時に話しておかないとこういう話も出来ないので、ちょっとそういう話をします。「よく冷やした固めの木綿豆腐に真っ黒けっけの塩味の効いた薄口生しょうゆぶっかけてかぶりついて食いたい」。そういうわけで、まあ、私にそう思わせぶりにカラんで来る女の子達も居るわけよ。私別にモテないですよ。只、「私達は悪い女ですー」と言わんばかりに性的アピールをする女子も居るわけ。疲れ果てた童貞を食い物にしようと狙ってやがる。かのように特段私は騙され無い。だからさー、治療の一環とか淋しい事言うのは止めてよ。私の居ない所でクソハゲキモブタオヤジとか陰口叩いてくれるのは別に良い。その、誘惑自体がフェイクっつーのは無しよ。そうだよ、女のそういうものが現象的だなんて、私だって分かってるので。だから辛いんだよねー、完全な演劇舞台上のキャラにされちゃうとさ、俺が。…パラノイアの女の子がイっちゃう楽しさ。生きてるの？楽しいよ？生きてれば。）

1:30 AM 3/1/2026




Joseph Stalin had called authors "engineers of the human soul." He liked French literatures particularly written by Victor Hugo or Honoré de Balzac, and they taught virtue in human beings no less than mere pleasure or source of enlightenment. Social power that he had grasped was worth explaining. Even though the doctor made a diagnosis of paranoia, he had made his enemy to starve. Diagnosis of paranoia of Joseph Stalin was associated with being philosophical rather than being social. However, how is society of human beings made of? It is no less than the picture of figuring out politics with a philosopher. The construct of "What is education?" was worth meaning transformation of mentality, against others, of him. The construct of "How is education?" was the fruit of Leon Trotsky of the globality. Stalin was not going to manage human resources like Trotsky. Perhaps Stalin was well understanding catastrophe of the conduction of spilled over class conflict globally. This was being totalizing Joseph Stalin, who was the concept of the nation as U.S.S.R. in that time. His reductionist philosophy, which had facilitated class conflict, explained the revolution all over the globe must not have taken place. Trotsky was resisting it, and Stalin's thought might be more abstract than Trotsky's fabrication. I do not think of the synonym of "concrete" as "abstract," but there was no need not only to explain but also to prove. If virtue is recognized among human beings, a mass of corpses is not to be in vain. Or people make the same mistake extraordinarily.

Writing down with a pen is worth adoring. Bill Gates the famous recommended handwriting, and it is to be said that it is obviously affordable for our mind to organize the thoughts or synthesize the ideas with analog tools rather than digital ones. It is easier to utilize them as tools or train our brain, particularly than relying on digital tools. As they say deterioration of academic ability in younger generations with the development of digital technology earlier, it is needless to say necessity of thinking for himself or herself. I almost always write sentences down in one continuous stroke. Those who make too much corrections are not good at clarifying him or her thoughts, I guess. For example, grand masters of literature look exemplifications, as of Kenzaburo Oe, so much mistakes, and as of Yukio Mishima, a calligraphy exemplar. As well, French nuance makes senses so, I guess, but English concerning German. Otherwise, English is international official language, and it is also one of Germanic languages. By the way, I  carry a selection of English, German, French, and Japanese, as a pen. ...Recently, I had written stiff writing down, and now is the time to respect.

（ペンで書く愉しみ。かのビル・ゲイツ氏も筆記具に拠る手書きを推奨しておられたが、自分の頭で考えをまとめるには明らかにデジタルよりアナログなツールを使う方が適している。ツールとしての有用性という点でも思考能力を鍛えるという点でも。昨今デジタル技術の発達に拠る若年層の学力低下が云われているが、自分の頭で考える事の大切さは言わずもがな。私もだいたい載せる文章をペンで一筆書きで書いているが、やはり修正箇所の多い人というのは、あまり思考のまとまりが強くない人なのではないかと思わせる。例えば、文豪の書いた原稿を見るに、大江健三郎氏は修正が多いが、三島由紀夫氏は清書の見本の様な文面を紡ぎ出している。だから、フランス語的なニュアンスではそういう事に為ってしまうのかもしれないが…ドイツ語、然らずんば、英語。英語は国際公用語だが、ゲルマン語である。まあ、私は、英独仏日と万年筆を取り揃えておりますがね。…ちょっとここのところ、固い文章ばかり載せるのもどうかと思い、こんなことばかり書いております。）

10:05 PM 2/28/2026