Self-sacrifice is usually different from self-preservation. Of course, altruism could cause another person suffering. Regardless of the purpose of a decliner, it often should be said, "What a purpose for it!" The instinct for correcting diminishes the objectivity of an action. It is socially necessary to tolerate an action, including exaggeration, to protect oneself, if reluctantly. Still, this problem is not over in such an individual case. If it proposes self-preservation as self-sacrifice or self-sacrifice as self-preservation, there is the recognition of the war as phenomenal.
(自己犠牲と保身は相容れない筈である。つまるところ、自己犠牲精神に拠って他者が傷付くという事は在るだろう。其処に加害者のどういう意図が在るにしろ、「何様のつもりだ」と言いたくなる様な行為は有り得る。是正の能動が、行為の客観性を減免させる。言動も含めて、身を守る行動というのは社会的に必要なのである。只、これは個人単位の問題に留まらない。自己犠牲の為の保身や保身の為の自己犠牲が想定される場合、其処に現象としての戦争が見做される筈である。)
10:44 PM 9/12/2025