According to academic substance, it must refer to the optimization of self-distinguishment for their purpose as academism. It is just an overloaded human psyche, which simply fears violence. It is accurate to work out as "persona of rationality," which means opportunities to avoid conflict and confusion. Of course, it is only the way for human resources to be moderate at the surface. It is only the product of that human psyche, simply fearing violence. This contribution does not work, as there is fundamental violence in human society as a phenomenon, and it does not constitute a social problem as a basic issue. Many academic studies have figured out that violence is just as a deviation or exception, and it rejects the recognition of final exemplification representing oppression, inequality, and craving. Education or economic policy, for instance, may reproduce a violent nature as well as the human psyche. Universities and institutes are desirable for "concrete fruit" rather than substantiality as a matter of fact, and many academic issues are purposeful for accumulation by acknowledgement or refinement of theory. It is out of order.
（アカデミズム一般に対して云える事だが、学問の為の学問に終始し自己目的化しているという事が在るだろう。それは、「暴力を恐れる心理」の延長線上に在り、対立や混乱を避ける事を第一義とした「理性の仮面」として機能している面が在る。それは結局、人的資本の（表層的な）穏健性の為の餌であり、人々が暴力を恐れる心理の産物でしか無いだろう。それは、人の社会における現象としての暴力を回避する事に貢献せず、問題の根本的な解決に為っていない。多くの学問は暴力を逸脱や例外として扱い、抑圧や格差や欲望に拠って表象される根源的な構造に踏み込む事は無い。教育や経済政策が、むしろ人にまつわって暴力性を再生産している。大学や研究機関は物事の本質的な問いよりも「具体的な成果」を求められることが多く、多くの学問が「知の蓄積」や「理論の精緻化」を目的とし、現実の問題解決から乖離している。）
9:01 AM 10/11/2025
