memo366

I predictably indicate absolute taboos, concerning myself. There are to be some interventions by others in the shape of particular cases about it, and they are just meaningless, because I predictably indicate, as it were. Ironically, others' decision-making is very unsophisticated, for me, as well. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and the principle of my decision-making is always too solid. ...Which one? ...And the concept of contradiction of it is regarded as the same. The probability in the world is disguised and possessing myself, as well. So, this strengthens my decision-making always. The end of this interaction recognizes consciousness of the self of me. This is absolute. Therefore, I am very interested in the concept of risk. The way of thinking of risk premium is only reflecting the concept of risk. The notion of probability always defies a kind of self-recognition. I am counter-representative in the world, as well. I have the world a kind of paradigm. Being so, I am the origin of the world. My existentiality in the ontological sense is like that of Pandora's Box. What a recognition of hatred in the world.

（私は、幾つか、（絶対に）行わない事というものを予め決めている。それに関して、場合に拠る特定の様々な形での他者に拠る干渉が存在するが、それが意味を為したり効力を発したりする事は無い。私が予めそう設定しているからである。残念ながら、これに関しては、他者の意思決定は非常に陳腐に映る。私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）において、物事にまつわる意思決定は常にはっきりしている。やる事、やらない事。それの背反についても同じである。世界にまつわる蓋然性は、その様に、私に取り付いている。そして、それが私における意思決定を常に強化している。その相関関係の結末に在るのが「私」という意識である。これは絶対不動である。だから、私はリスクの概念に敏感である。リスク選好が高いとか低いとかいう選定もリスクの一である。概念としての蓋然が唯我独尊的な認識をも屠る。世界は、その様に、「逆象」している。私は、その様に、世界をパラダイム化している。私が世界の火元と成っているのだ。少なくともオントロジカルな、私の存在は、パンドラボックスそのものである。世界に憎悪に浸る事程心地の良いものが在るだろうか？）

11:38 PM 4/23/2026




Red Purge. What an insanity of victims of it. The more being associated with it, the more being annihilated. So-called Japanese simplicity makes sense then. In other words, sexuality between Japanese men and Japanese women is obviously separated into both side. Unfortunately, the way of increase of population was once so definitive. Japanese pretty girls have been called, depending on a case, prostitutes. Recently, the ability of human reproductivity is under declining in Japan. What must be recognized? From the perspective depending on these, the sociality of Japanese women is harshly worsened. I am not capable of mentioning whether the particular collective of each fact explains or not, but it is possible to say that Japanese women are now under attack, for example, with the social capability of artificial intelligences being technologically innovated. After all, in the shape of Japan, social authority is depending on men. For instance, economic indicators are reflecting not how to be but what to be, and it is not worth designating as being fortunately scientific. What must be abstracted away? That's not woman beings.