The issue, Socrates publicized "I know that I know nothing.", is also misunderstanding. He was alone and incredible, as existential. If he were to be living in the modernized society, he must be recognized as a patient of a kind of mental disease. By the way, it should not be said that he declared it, but he had his own existentiality as classified. It was understood that proactive attitude was taking effect. Everything was information alongside him with his existentiality, and he was absorbed in questions and answers, did nothing but them night and day, and spent all his time that Q&A. "As if others were hoping for it," he was going to hope for it. Of course, in a broad sense this issue was rational murder and a kind of documentation of perfect crime. ...What a pathetic sight of Socrates as a non-practical meritocrat! It is not difficult to comprehend what his last time had been from the allegory. As if a person like him is living in the modernized society as a practical meritocrat, I can not help imagining his or her happiness.
（ソクラテスが、"I know that I know nothing."と提唱したというのは、誤解を招くだろう。彼は、そういう社会的存在という事で、唯一無二であった。もし、彼が現代に生きていたら、精神病者扱いされていたかもしれない。彼は、それを自ら提唱した訳では無く、社会的にclassifiedされたそういう存在であった。そして、その事は、彼の自発的な能動でもってして行われていると見做された。彼において、全ての情報は知識と化し、拠って彼は問答に明け暮れた。「もし貴方がそれを望むのならば」という事で、彼は人々の望み通りにした…つもりだったのである。無論、これは、合法的な殺人であり、完全犯罪のマニュアル化の類である。…ソクラテスは、無様にも、実力の及ばない実力主義者として、醜態を曝け出した。彼が最後どう殺されたかは、寓話から察するという形ででも、想像に難く無い。もし、彼の様な人が現代に生きており、「実力が及ぶ」のであるとしたら、さぞかし幸せな事だろう。）
3:50 AM 2/15/2026