"Justice is power." is wrong. "Power is justice." is the right saying. How perceptibly does accurate justice harm a person? Like a sleeping drug, it profoundly injures step by step with adequate delusion. As if the reality that a person recognizes is frequently collapsing, a person intends to fall asleep with that delusion. I often mention it as a virtue as if it were like that, and what is reality? The more people think that they see a vision relying on each individual, the more "humanism (of enlightenment)" takes place. With the Enlightenment in history, human beings were (considered to be) exactly (being) adequate.
(2:10 PM 6/1/2025)
Israel is angry. Exactly, I agree with "Why can they do this?" by Palestine's ambassador to the UN. However, Hamas has to get Israeli hostages back. As well as (the existence of) presumptive accuracy between Israeli far-right politicians and Hamas, people misunderstand the situation as translated into the dissension "above and below."
(5:09 PM 6/1/2025)
America has regulation. Following his America First trade policies, U.S. President Trump is trying to vitalize American industries once more. The partnership between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel represents this. For example, the CCP's manufactured products are high quality and cheap. To revitalize a deliberative issue in the U.S., U.S. citizens must be prehistorically (a little) socialistic. What kind of socialism is it? It is not like one of Russia, Iran, North Korea, and so on. China is respectable, on the other side, because China aims to retreat its (political) position and hack the "politicized" economy in the U.S. Recently, Chinese President Xi publicized "law and order" domestically. A panic in Eurasia, the war between Russia and Ukraine, for example, would be an objective for the new world order of reclaiming a lost generation of democracy, especially in the U.S. Where on earth is Reconquista?
(4:26 AM 6/2/2025)
Artificial general intelligence will regulate the context of the labor market in the future. Some people will temporarily lose their jobs, and then, it will be necessary to adopt a somewhat socialistic for human beings. There are no human resources for jobs, but there are jobs for human existence. With AGI, there will be no necessity to perpetrate manual labor. Getting along with only the consumption of money, which is necessary for daily commodities, what kind of explanation advocates for the people themselves? Still, people will demand to receive public education alongside AGI. When public education gives itself to the people, what will take place? This new perspective might reignite competition among individuals. Since ancient times, human beings have repeatedly repealed innovations. Where is the end of the world? One famous Japanese economist proclaimed that graves represent reincarnation (of human beings). There are humans here, there, and everywhere. Everything is self-addicting, and then. In my opinion, this conceivable is ideal, and everyone knows virtue there.
(2:02 PM 6/2/2025)
Working for others is not difficult, because "The only meaning of life is to serve humanity." Leo Tolstoy said this. He also said, "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself." Working for self-esteem is difficult. Paradoxically, each conscience bothers each self-esteem. If each person's self-esteem bothers their conscience, then working on self-esteem is not difficult. However, in this case, "Everyone thinks of changing the world." In this case, identification serves just as a definition. As "Everyone thinks of changing himself," working for others is not difficult.
(7:54 AM 6/3/2025)
Please do not demand a woman frequently as a man. The human female is (just) an object of demand for the human male as if human instinct has conquered him, on the other hand. There is no problem about "Which way do men demand them?" If it is true that a man conceives a woman, he should not touch her. Gazing at her is not good, too. No matter what happens, a woman takes a risk. A woman is weaker than a man in general. So, the ordinaries are capable of understanding that physically pleasing human flesh is too awful to commit to, as if only high monarchs are allowed to do it. Human beings distinguish themselves in the way of a monkey by the way. The law or primitive demeanors are none of our business, then and there. Please look at fanatic people. Metaphysical thinking can not provide the answer, "Where do their interests and enthusiasms come from?" "It" is the weak point of us.
（（男として）女をみだりに需要するな。逆に云えば、ヒトのオスとしての本能に根差して、男にとって女（ヒトのメス）というのは需要の対象でしか無い。「どの様に（それを）需要するか」という事は其処では問題と為らない。本当に真摯に女を好み思うのであれば、女には触れるな。不乱に凝視するのも良くない。何が有っても女が割を食う様に為っている。（女の方が、男に比して）弱いというのはそういう事だ。人の肉体を物理的に喜ばせてしまうという事が、特権階級にのみそれが許されたところのものである様な、どれ程おぞましい事であるか、大人に成れば理解出来る様に為る。ヒトは、所詮サルのなれの果ての、そういうおぞましい生き物。法や社会的道義など抑止力にすら為らぬ。狂った人々を見よ。あれらが「どの様にそう為ったのか」、形而上的な考えは答えにすら為らぬ。「それ」が我々人の恐ろしい所なのである。）
※いつもは英文に関しては英語で直接書いてるんですが、この文章は先に日本語で万年筆でノートに書いて後で和文英訳を試みるという形を取ったので、その日本語の文章もせっかくなのでアップしておきますね。清書に25分、タイプするのに15分、英訳するのに35分くらいです。あ、英語を書く際に使っているのはGrammarlyのフリープランですよ。微修正の為。というか、フリープランじゃないと英語の勉強にならないし、書いた文章の内容を変えられたくないのでね。
(12:40 PM 6/3/2025)
They, human females, are afraid of "it." They can not help translating anything about "it," like jealousy, hatred, and fear, into something. There is no conceivable way to defy "The development of society is protecting of women," like admiration, social characterizing, and reasoning in general. As once said, human beings depend on that "monkey business." Humans are only capable of taking development for granted. We can not afford to abandon "it" by the effort. To solve the problem of exterminating "it," there is the only way to stop becoming human females by women. It is possible to mention that sexual act is dignified for it from the metaphysical point of view. By the way, it is a woman's act to exchange the gender gap into "possible reasonability" or to manifest it. Unfortunately, the skill for abortion and the one for being pregnant without one's body make human beings more savage and primitive in modern civilization in the shape of being like cockroaches. Society was civilized like "that" of women beings. Nothing to that.
（彼女ら女性は「それ」を恐れている。嫉妬、怨嗟、恐怖…「それ」にまつわるものを、誇大解釈というよりは、何らかに変換せずにはいられない。羨望、社会的キャラクター設定、理由付け一般…「社会の発展とはメスの防衛である」という考えが間違いであるとは私は考えない。先述の通り、ヒトというのは（サルのなれの果ての）その程度の生き物なのである。ヒトは「その様にしか」進化出来ない。「それ」を捨象する事は、努力に拠っては、不可能である。「それ」を取り除き、問題を解決するには、女性がヒトのメスである事を止めるしか無い。セックスは、形而上的に、それの為の儀式であるという事が出来るが、つまり、あれは、女性における性差概念を「何らかの合理性」へと昇華させ、（何らかの）合理化を図る為に在る行為なのである。残念ながら、避妊技術や体外受精技術の発達に拠り、近現代文明社会においてその事はますます顕著に為ってしまった。人の野蛮性は、ミもフタも無い言い方をすれば人のコックローチ性は、文明化に拠って増幅したのである。社会は「その様に」女性化した。言わずもがな。）
※この文章も一つ前のものと同じく先に日本語で万年筆でノートに書いて後で和文英訳を試みるという形を取りました。清書に25分、タイプするのに10分、英訳するのに30分くらいです。
(4:09 PM 6/3/2025)
The fanatics of falsifying socialistic homeostasis in psychiatry figure out the group of social outlaws with their schizophrenic consciousness. "There is no that place (in society)." Psychiatrists take patients with mental illness who dream of infinity as "nothing but eternal place" for granted. After all, I have taken place "there." The odd combination of the representation of it as the physical and the representation of it as the non-physical existence figures out "the act," in the case of me. The regeneration of (my) acts works out systemic racism (for another). Then, there is just anything but systemic racism (of interaction) by chaotic racism (for me). In general, psychiatrists conclude it is "the end of the disease."
（精神医学のそれにおける自体的な社会主義的恒常性に対する信奉者達は、その分裂気味な意識の持ちと共に、社会的なアウトローの群れとして、一形骸を形作っている。（社会的に）「そんな場所は何処にも無い」のである。精神科医達は、其処に永遠は無いものであるにもかかわらず（「其処に」）永遠を夢見てしまっている精神病患者達がどう転ぶかを、見ている。私の場合、結局、「其処に」場所を作ってしまった。物理としての表象であるそれと非物理的な存在としての表象であるそれとの奇妙な合致が、私という存在における「実践」を形作る。その（私における）行動概自体が、（他者に対する）システミックなレイシズムとして働いている。其処で、（私に対する）カオティックなレイシズムは、（自他に対する）システミックなレイシズムを虚無に四散霧消させる。一般的に、それをもってして、精神科医達は、病気の治療と為している。）
※この文章も先に日本語で万年筆でノートに書いて後で和文英訳を試みるという形を取りました。清書に35分くらい、タイプするのに10分、英訳するのに25分くらい、掛かってます。
(1:10 PM 6/4/2025)
