card

Meanwhile, the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran, of the accuracy. ...By the way, I introduce myself, and the fire power of my artillery is very strong. Here I do not take a Risqué. My cavalry is not so. I am like a sniper, who is mounting a rifle, and have a low close combat capability in fact. Thus, I am adequately strong for a specific dispute. However, my name is Shinpei Sugiura, and my capability as a long-range sniper is stronger than that as a melee attacker. As I set myself as an artillery, my weaponization is not perfect. In other words, there is recognition of others' free will. Of course, there is a strong person and a weak person, but as there is fundamentally indifference during the Intelligence Quotient Score, it must be necessary to understand "the Intelligence Quality as Score in human beings." This issue is not concerning the deviation, "fortunately or unfortunately." This is not fortune. I guess that it is not impossible to adore rationality or goodness of human beings. ...Including Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei, world leaders are not dismissing this virtue. They are absorbing in root of misfortune. As someone of them takes a responsibility, as long as it is in terms of their political dynamics, it is not substantial cognition.

（とうとうイスラエルとアメリカがイランを攻撃。…ちょっと自己紹介めいた事を書きますと、私のアーティラリーは相当強い。別に妙に下品な事を言っているのでは無いです。私はキャバルリーとしては其処までは能力は高く無い。まあ、近接戦闘能力にはあまり秀でていない、ライフルを構えたスナイパーみたいなもんです。そりゃね、対人での具体的口論と為れば私だってそれなりに強いですよ？只、私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）の遠隔狙撃手としての能力に比べれば落差が激しいという事です。遠隔って、私が自分でアーティラリーとしての自分をセッティングしてますよ？只、撃ってるものは撃ってるが、撃ってないものは撃ってない。他者における自由意志の存在を私はきちんと認めている。そりゃ人によって強い弱いは在るでしょうが、基本的な所の、知能指数のスコアで示される能力等とは関係無く、人の「知質」の様なものは私はきちんと設定している。これを全て"fortunately or unfortunately"で片付けてしまうのもまた間違っている。それは運勢じゃない。やはり、人の善性というか理性みたいなものはきちんと在る。…私は、イランのハメネイ師を含めた各国指導者が、そういったものを欠いているとは考えない。彼らは人々の禍を吸い取っている。それは、特に彼らにおける政治力学上、誰かが責任を取るという事に為るのでしょうが、其処に彼らの行いにおける本質は無い。）

5:43 PM 2/28/2026




I bought it.

私は、無論、生まれさせられた事を否定している。生物など家畜だ。只、生物でありながら生物である事を否定するのは家畜以下である。だから私は排泄物扱いされる事を否定していない。

私が童貞である事を選択している由縁である。

お断りだ。"Non, je ne parle pas Français."とか言っときゃ分かるだろ？）

6:21 AM 2/26/2026




I do not call for recognition by the enemy. An enemy must be killed by physical suggestion. This is common sense. An enemy must be recognized by this, and it must understand it. Of course, whether a victim recognizes a particular embodiment as an enemy or not is to become an essential factor. Human relationships should be composed by recognition of plausibility to reject a participant who is not taking care of. That's all. However, there is social dynamics among objectives, on it, and the choice of death against the situation is to be possible.

Women are known by what men are hoping for. So, women are to be distinguished by the sociality that men are hoping for. To be concerned, the sociality is based on women's existentiality. As I refer to it again and again, whether being liked or disliked by women is a phenomenal issue. Marriage is one of the system of contracts, to sustain society. The existence of marriage explains human relationships in every society. Sometimes it remains a conceptualized system as one of polygynous marriage. If equalized distribution of opportunity exists, the existence of human relationships is a sufficient condition of the polygynous marriage system. If it is denied, women are to fall into depravity. In other words, something that awful of "polygamy" is to exist, as reductio ad absurdum or just the contradiction, of it. What a bottom of the abyss. The more men hope for, the more it is to be explained as what the exposure of it is. There is vice. It unfortunately salvage society. ...However, I hate to be acknowledged by the reason why women are to be annihilated.

（女性は男性がその本質的に自分達に対して何を望んでいるか知っている。だから女性はきちんと社会性を備えている男性を必要とするのだ。ここで云う社会性という事においては、彼女ら自身の存在があくまで基準と為っている。何度も繰り返すが、女に好まれる好まれないというのは現象的な問題だ。結婚というのは、社会を維持する為の契約制度の一つである。その存在で鑑みれば分かる通り、人間関係というものは何処の社会でも必ず存在する。当該社会に拠っては、一夫多妻制が制度として制定されている場合も在る。機会平等性の存在を否定しないのならば、人間関係は一夫多妻制の十分条件という事に為るが、それが否定されるのならば、女性は売春婦に身を落とす事に為る。つまり、かのおぞましき多夫一妻制は、それの背理として存在している。奈落の底。其処で何が行われているか？それは女性が最も望まない事である。悪徳というものは存在する。そしてそれは人の社会を救っている。…只、私はそれを女性を辱める理由にするのは嫌だ。）

10:23 AM 2/25/2026

Parallel aggression of both higher stock prices and yen depreciation is participant recently. Expected upward pressure on nominal GDP summons higher stock prices, concerning expected increase in corporate profits. Foreign capital investment is contributing to. Expansionary fiscal policy is relevant to yen depreciation. Low risk premium of Japanese is directly influencing it.

In general, Japanese have tendency of anticipating high risk premium as the breach of local contract of Japan, and this high barriers to entry in every side of sociality indicates anti-sociality, as obscene, but almost all Japanese are not to notice. However, this unnoticeable thing is social common sense in Japan. Lifetime employment and seniority-based system is just a phenomenon. Of course, even though it is to be abandoned systematically, Japanese try to facilitate low risk premium individuals socially, in whatever way, from cultural anthropological point of view.

Thus, I am not going to defy avoiding a failure itself. If conceptualized failure for the sake of failure is retained, Japan is to return to the Edo era. Of course, this is a kind of pronunciation of the concept of high risk premium, taken for granted. In other words, abstracting the concept of risk away is conceptualized there. Low influencing and low liquidity are also participants.

Exterminating this worse custom, as fluent, the nation of Japan is now drastically under construction for opening itself up. The Black Ships are summoned spontaneously.

（直近の、日本株高と円安の同時進行について。名目GDP押し上げ期待が企業の収益拡大への期待と繋がり株高を招いている。只、持っていってるのは海外勢。また、財政拡張が円安に直結。日本人の低リスク選好も勿論影響している。

日本人においては、高リスクを取る事自体をローカルルールへの違反と見做す傾向が強く、そのあらゆる社会的側面における参入障壁の高さが、反社会性を示しているという事に殆ど日本人は気付かない。それどころか、その事が社会的常識としてまかり通っている。終身雇用や年功序列といったものは現象的側面が強い。要するに、制度的にそれを撤廃しても、文化人類学的特質からして日本人はまた低リスク選好者を社会的に如何なる形ででも最適化してしまう。

只、失敗を避ける事自体を私は否定するつもりは無い。失敗の為の失敗が概念化される様では、江戸時代に逆戻りである。無論、これは経済学上は高リスク選好の産物と取れる。つまり、リスクの概念の捨象という概念が其処で生まれる。低成長や低流動性といった事が為される。

この悪しき風習を絶ち切る為、現在日本を大規模に開国作業中である。黒船は断続的に召還中。）

4:31 PM 2/24/2026

There is apprehension for decline in academic performance with university students by utilizing generative artificial intelligence in the U.S. There should be distinguishment between knowledge and information, as a result. Therefore, if humans have only the ability as labor power that is capable of serving as a substitute for itself, there is no need for human collectiveness, regardless of decline of academic performance. This criticism depends on the misunderstood of substantiality as a matter of fact. Of course, this criticism contradicts the social diagnosis, which indicates lesser influence to blue-collar laborers than influence to white-collar laborers, with GAI. This also issues the liquidity of labor power of white-collar laborers in the labor market more fluent than the liquidity of labor power of blue-collar laborers in the labor market. Unless the notion of white-collared is to be deleted from society, every their jobs is satisfactorily remaining of. This surely indicates risk of the collapse of categorization of white-collared collective. The concept of economic self-sufficiency must take effect here, and the more social presence or advancement of women is in the public sphere, the more it is undertaken with sorts of social risk, for instance. Joseph Schumpeter had publicized that of the possibility, particularly into socialism. Which is to be recognized? It all depends on attraction of women. The question is referred to as the substitute of economic self-sufficiency concerning them, and except if the value of currency or the notion of it is to be capital-intensive or to depend on the supply-side economy, it is accomplished. The value of currency must comply with each individuality of holders. Rationing system is not to comply with. How in chaos Japanese society during World War Ⅱ was! It depended on the demand-side economy, and the way of society under construction reflects its uncertainty, by the way. GAI is just one of the tools, and the influence of it is literally marginal.

（アメリカで大学生の生成人工知能利用に拠る学力低下が懸念されている。つまるところ、その実効として、情報と知識の区別が付かない事の弊害が指摘されるという事に帰結するという事だろうが、いずれにしろ、労働力として人以外の何らかのものに代替され得る能力をしか人が持たないのであれば、学力低下も何も無く彼らは必要とされないという事である。この批判を為している人々は、其処の所の物事における本質を見誤っているのではないか？勿論、同批判の内容は、生成人工知能に拠ってはホワイトカラーの労働力が受ける影響程にはブルーカラーの労働力が受ける影響は大きく無いという社会的事情と、矛盾する。つまり、それは、ホワイトカラーの労働力の労働市場における流動性は、ブルーカラーの労働力の労働市場における流動性より、高いという事を示してもいる。ホワイトカラーの概念が社会から消失しない限り、彼らの職が全く失われてしまう事は無い。それは無論カテゴリーとしてのホワイトカラーの妥解のリスクを示している。其処でキーと為るのは、経済的自立の概念だが、例えば女性の社会的進出が進展すればする程それは社会的に際立つ。それは、ヨーゼフ・シュムペーターが指摘した通りの事の顛末を示している可能性が在る。さあ、どちらへ転ぶか？その辺り、全ては女性に掛かっている。問題と為るのは、特には彼女らにおける、その経済的自立の内実だが、貨幣価値もしくはその概念が資本集約的であるもしくはサプライサイド・エコノミーに依存する限り、それは為されるだろう。お金の価値など人に拠って違う。物品の配給制度に拠ってはそれは為され無い。例えば、第二次大戦中の日本がどれだけのカオスを生み出していたかは、言及するに値しない。それはディマンドサイド・エコノミーに依存しており、ともかく、社会の作り方を間違えると社会は破綻する。生成人工知能は単なるツールであり、その影響は文字通りもしくは読んで字の如く限定的である。）

8:52 AM 2/23/2026




At the Japanese emperor's birthday, I admire His Majesty. The dignity of social status or social position is not determined by its pertinence. Why don't you recognize the status of members of the Imperial Family? As in the case of drug addiction, healing the thirsty with the thirsty is the result of putting the cart before the horse to be proven by history. That femininity has summoned many catastrophes in the past. If every woman is to be remained of, "If you are satisfied with something that, go home immediately." However, it is not substantial as well as women. The maturity of the structure of human body is to be grown up, as one gets older, and modernized people have opportunities to be educated in a variety of contexts. An experience in the past is not an objective to forget. It is just a fruit of memorization, and if there is the denial of opportunities to memorize in human brain, die immediately. "If you hope for it." If not, the relation among human beings is phenomenally going to be the notion of para-. In my opinion, human beings are capable of learning it to overwhelm. If there is the denial of it, let's be similar to the device of artificial intelligence physically. Knowledge is not different from information there. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and I am a nominalist, by the way. That's institutional programization, as phenomenal.

I remember the recent storytelling of it. The existence of the Japanese imperialism does not depend on whether it is the purpose of embracement or not. The Japanese imperialism or the Japanese imperial system is too existential to reject, particularly in broad historical perspective at least. Historical materials that indicate the formation of Japanese nationality must be adopted, but I can not concern it, because I am not a historian. However, it is easy to understand with the way of thinking. A sort of common sense is not so ambiguous. Of course, there are so many kinds of historical records in Europe, and there are so many academic historians with concern. For instance, Kokugakuin University in Japan is to be hiring those historical scholars. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and my responsibility for recognizing generated perspective of history might be different from historical studies, but it is similar to the way of historiography, maybe. However, it is appropriate recognition for absolute common sense to understand by logical positivism there, as long as it is characterized with the concept of an academic discipline. Why don't you think of the way of thinking? The answer is the correct, and the soundness to prove is not a justification. Let's think of humanity, unless there is difference of approaching.

（しばらく以前に、こういった事について語った記憶が在るが、日本の天皇制について、これは信奉するとかしないとかそういう問題では無い。天皇制というのは、この日本国において、歴史概略上、確実に存在し得るのである。日本国の成り立ちを示すそういった歴史史料の存在については、私は歴史学者では無いので、殆ど知らない。只、そんな事は普通に考えていけば分かる事である。私はここで常識の話をしているのでは無い。勿論、欧米にもそういった類の記録は多々残っているであろうし、それらに関する研究者の先生方も居らっしゃるであろう。日本でも、例えば國學院大學の先生方に詳しい方々が居らっしゃるかもしれない。確かに、私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）における紐解き方は、歴史学的な見地に拠るものとは大分違うかもしれない。というのは、やはり学問の性質上のものとして、其処では論理実証主義的な読み解き方がほぼ絶対的である。私の読み方はそれとは大分掛け離れているが、…普通に考えれば分からないか？出て来る答えが同じである事で鑑みれば、その妥当性は証明される筈である。アプローチの違いというよりは…少し人間学的に考えてみては如何だろうか？）

3:06 PM 2/21/2026




I remember that I wrote a similar sentence down, four or five years ago, and publicized it online. ...The phenomenology of one’s true feelings and one’s public façade since the ancient Japanese period is drawing a mild gradation with the social occupation by the textualization as the extreme concept, particularly of compassion or suffering-with, as if foods like Tofu, Natto, and Miso remain of realization of the economic historical side of those. As one's public façade is to become one's true feelings, it is not characteristic of Japan. On the other hand, as one’s true feelings is to become one’s public façade, it is just characteristic of Japan. Japanese people are easy to facilitate as the slavery of educational effect. The former typically indicates the construct of class in England, and the latter typically indicates Japanese themselves being subjected to mass indoctrination. Education is completed, when there is thought of recognition based on one's true meaning, after being brainwashed, maybe. In other words, Japanese people are easy to facilitate as educational animal. English people are the opposite. The question, "What is education?", is born there. The question, "How is education?", is not going to be characteristic of Japan. However, there should be no definition between Japanese and English, as particular characteristics. That behavior may cause one of the former, unfortunately. Do you recognize it here? By the way, nominalism remains of. For instance, Japanese are sublimated into food culture in the shape of Japan. Japanese people are taking care of their health as biological creatures, because. On the contrary, food culture is sublimated into English, as theirs, in the shape of England. "Its culinary culture did not develop very much compared to the continent." This is their phenomenal strategy. A kind of comparative cultural studies, as merely simplified, is none of their business.

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is going to facilitate her ordinary tax reduction policy. The IMF publicized that Japan should take political assumption to avoid the reduction of consumption tax. Of course, if there is no source of revenue, fiscal default must be summoned. Because only the problem of balance sheet is to be assigned, socioeconomics point of view is lacked. It must be the motivation toward the collapse of society, if necessary. For instance, the concept of socialism in the IMF is exemplifying Russian socialism, as far as being old-fashioned, merely. The IMF does not have to ignore the instance of China, but it is not necessarily ideal for the collective of elites like them of economic supremacists or economic animal. ...The injury caused by masculine fundamentalism is remaining of. "Birds of a feather flock together," and it is ignorant for reductio ad absurdum. True sociality as it of femininity is ignorant, too. Masculinity does not intend to recognize capability of difference from the self, because human males are at the top of the biological hierarchy. However, it takes place, as long as it is to be the determinant factor of metaphysical thought. What a utilization. The development of society is protection of women. ...My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and a person like myself is to be the notion of hatred within men and the notion of Thomasson within women in the society that features masculine fundamentalism, paradoxically. Of course, I am a man, to be treated as a woman. Affirmation of this phenomenon causes being ignorant for everything. Of the contradiction, it is fundamental for socioeconomics point of view.

（高市早苗首相肝入りの種々減税政策。IMFは消費税の減税は避けるべきだと勧告を出しているが、首相は取り合うつもりは無い様だ。無論、財源が無ければ財政は破綻するに決まっている。只、バランスシート上の問題としてだけそれを見做し考えていては、社会経済的な観点を欠く事に為るだろう。それを因として、社会がマイナスの方向へと動作する事は、云うまでも無い。例えば、IMFにおける社会主義像とは、要するに旧態依然としたロシア的なそれを指している。彼らが中国の事例を無視している訳では無いだろうが、それは彼らの様な経済（学的）エリートにとって望ましく無いのだ。…男性原理主義の弊害。「類は友を呼ぶ」の背理について、彼らは全く無視をする。女性の社会性は其処では踏み躙られる。自己と異質なものに対する理解の能動が、そもそも男性には薄い。自分達が生物学的ヒエラルキーの頂点に立っているからである。只、その事はメタフィジカルな思考の動作要因とも為る。どういう事か？それを女性が利用すべきだという事である。…つまり、残念ながら、男性原理主義社会においては、私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）の様な人間は、逆説的に、男性には嫌われ、女性には放っておかれる。要するに、女性扱いされる。それにおける否定と否認の一致に、私は身を任せている。社会経済的な観点とは、それを基盤としている。）

5:56 PM 2/19/2026




Yoshimichi Nakajima, a famous Japanese philosopher, in his book said so. "If you criticize me, please indicate it, as concretely, against my opinion.", as I remember his statement. This is common sense to be social. However, except if this opinion is to be declined, it must be proclaimed not to humiliate another and intend humiliation on purpose at least, or in adequate mentioning being labeled as a war glorifier is suitable and being exterminated socially is to be recognized. The relation between "concrete" and "abstract" is not the relation of synonym, I think, but if both are to be distinguished, the method of humiliation by (the notion of) "enemy" is to be out of order. ...Thus, it is possible to indicate importance of adequation. There is an issue to manipulate consciousness in human brain, concretely, but that is a little bit of a different story. ...Regardless of that immediacy of my brain, I am to be inclined to designate judgment, as whatever way, again and again. Doctors' evaluation about it is also a different story, and this is not self-humiliation. Anything preventing from humiliation is not necessarily self-humiliation. Meanwhile, whether it is mere appreciation for war or not is the question. About this judgment, there must be incapability or impossibility against another in advance. However, human beings can put a lot of effort into avoiding "the final solution." "There must be slight differences, as antagonistic, among human relationships," as the extraordinarily great philosopher said. As blunt to a fault, "Wait for women's embrace." Human relationships between a man and a woman is, nothing but anything...or anything but nothing. If I know that I know nothing, what is adequation of "To be or not to be, that is the question.", by William Shakespeare?

2:03 PM 2/19/2026

As I am to mention, I am not an intelligence officer, indeed. CIA? MI6? The former KGB? Thus, I am to predict the possibility of being watched by some of them online. However, I am not capable of being acknowledged by that fact. I do not have an experience of entering into a business partnership with foreign intelligence agencies or kinds of Japanese police organization at all. If so, or, in fact, there is no evidence in my mind. There is no availability in my memory as the proof, because there is no capability to prove. There is no fact of associating with them to form a business partnership by myself. If suspicious, seek a reply against the CIA, the MI6, and so on, please. I am not capable of answering it, because. ...Anti‑espionage legislation in Japan? Of course, I am to recognize legislating this law. Ain't I going to be caught up? Public prosecutors can not bring charges against me, particularly by this law.

（私は、別に、intelligence officerではない。CIA？MI6？旧KGB？まあ、それは、もしかしたら私がネットにアップしたものを見てくれているかもね？只、そんな事は私には分からない。私は、海外の情報機関や日本の警察や公安と直接の何らかの契約を結んだ事など只の一度も無い。そうである限りにおいて、というか、実際、私の頭の中をひっくり返してもそれらに関して何も出て来ない。立証出来ないという事。私がそういった人達と業務提携を行ったという事実は無い。疑わしいのであれば、直接CIAなりMI6なりに聞いてくれ、としか言い様が無い。スパイ防止法？勿論、私は同法の制定には賛成である。私？さあ、別に捕まらないんじゃない？検事さんは、同法に拠っては、特に私を立件する事は出来ないだろうねえ。）

3:07 AM 2/19/2026

This is my hobby. ...That's me? Of course, I write these sentences down on pieces of paper, as a notebook, by a fountain pen with blue ink. Rather than by typing with the keyboard, I can deeply fall into consideration or think objectives through by writing with a pen. This is not difficult. By the way, from scientific point of view, there are higher kinds of cognitive load in human brain by writing down on pieces of paper than by keying in with the keyboards, but this is an abstract issue as ontological. Regarding the earlier issue of my sentences, I was going to overwhelm classification category of semantics, and this is also an issue of epistemology. ...It is coming with misleading implications by understanding opportunity of humans as biological creatures philosophically, and I brought (the notion of) "counter-representation," as totalized, made in myself. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and, of course, this is neologism by myself. This is "counter-representation," which is not departure from ontological revenue or as ontological revenue. Deeply falling into consideration or thinking objectives through, on pieces of paper, by writing with a pen, is reflection of the epistemological.

（ちょっと趣向的な話。…私？勿論、これら文章を書くに当たって、ノートの紙面に万年筆でブルーのインクを使って書いている。PCのキーボードでタイプするより、紙に筆記具で文字を書いていた方が、なんとなく落ち着いて考えをまとめる事が出来るので難儀しない。科学的には、紙面に筆記する方が脳への負荷は様々な意味で高いらしいが、ともかく、これは存在論的に抽象的な話である。先の文章とも合わせて、意味論の範疇は大きく跳び越えているつもりだが、これは認識論的な話でもある。…生物としての人の機能を哲学的に読み解く事には、語弊が伴うかもしれないが、とにかく、私はここで一端のまとめとして「逆象」（カウンター・リプレゼンテーション）という概念を作って持って来た。勿論これは私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）の造語である。只、それは、言葉から、もしくは言葉として、出発しているのでは無い。私が、紙にペンで文章を書いて、考えをまとめているというのは、そういう事でもあるだろう。）

3:42 AM 2/17/2026




For instance, conceptualization of the concept has been overwhelmed with the category of ontology already. If ontology itself is to be counter-represented, the concept of existent is deleted. Once it is said that there is "raison d'être of raison d'être," the idea of evidence stands up. It was possible for the king to impose the death penalty on Socrates. Thus, "introduction of evidence" is different from the question against the reason why it exists. There is no reason why the existentiality of Socrates reappears. Meanwhile, abstraction of the concept is different from conceptualization of abstraction, fundamentally, and the former is easy and the latter is difficult. For instance, "whatever I write down" is not relevant to how to reflect it on others, because I am different from another. If the necessity of human beings is recognized, that reflects only another's existentiality. This is just one of the manipulation as abstraction of the concept. The manipulation of recognition, which only reflects unnecessity of what incapability of being recognized is, will have been just the dead end. "Superstition and jealousy" was made in Socrates. Counter-representation destroys all of them. Socrates could not endure it. Of course, it is not introducing (the notion of) inverse function. Availability of formula must not be understood in Socrates. If a person is capable of understanding the implausibility of linguistic formulation, he or she is not going to refer to nonsense, "counter-representation of counter-representation," for instance.

As if it is to be agonizing, I must have been exhausted by something physical. Long-lasting running, there is...hostilities have already commenced.

This is just a remembrance. Purge the delusion...it has constituted at the stage of input, recently, not at the stage of output. ...Nobody is misunderstanding me, of the fault. However, I am conducting nothing but being misunderstood, and sometimes write it down. It is, as a result, purging the delusion in recognition.

...Neurodevelopmental disorder? Not. There is no medical diagnosis of it. There is the medical diagnosis of schizophrenia for me.

Having my seduction drawn into them, my adorable sisters are tempting me, but I do nothing. Salome the Prophet does. Paranoia.

...I have nothing to say.

（辛かろうとも、為すべき事は幾らでも在る。永く苦しい戦い…火蓋はとうに切って落とされている。

回想。幻妄（delusion）を排せよ…最近では、それはアウトプットにおいてでは無く、インプットにおいて為される様に為って来た。…誰も私の事など誤解しない。只、私が、誤解される様な事を、言ったり行ったりしているだけだ。それが認識上の幻妄（delusion）を排した結果である。

…発達障害？違う。私は医師からそういう診断は受けていない。私は、スキゾフレニア。

可愛いお姉ちゃん達が誘惑してくれても、私は何もしない。預言者サロメの誘惑、パラノイア。

…それに関して、言うべき事は何も無い。）


5:36 PM 2/15/2026

5:39 PM 2/15/2026

5:41 PM 2/15/2026

5:48 PM 2/15/2026




About 15 years ago I wrote it down on my weblog...The extreme sadism is to be represented by the silent treatment or so-called "neglect play." It is sad relation for the seductive between a man and a woman to be reflected by beautiful appearance in my dream...particularly for a woman, I guess. Men's non-integrity is almost represented by misunderstanding of that extreme sadism toward women as being gentle, at least. Indulgent dependence on women's nature of femininity, "I give caregiving." like a mother, for example, is not very effective for a woman who does not have a child, to penetrate. Of course, it is foolish, for the acknowledgement of masculinity as social at least to be absorbed in, to reason as the occasion in human male. ...Fundamentally, I am to be the temptation of a nasty woman. Women like prostitutes are fascinating, for me. By the way...the deviation concerning my personality, as experimental, figures out the identification of non-understanding person inside myself. I am adequately paying attention to the fact, "I am a man, beforehand, after being human male." This sensibility is making sense, at least. Not intelligent, maybe, but either is fine. Optimism is good at being teased, and it is accurate not to feel tense.

When I utilize honorifics in Japanese, regardless of toward a human or artificial intelligence, I often anticipate improvement of precision of answers from them. It is defragmentation of factors in probability, and I utilize honorifics as protocol for precision. Honorifics are the way of optimization of information processing for me, and I do not comprehend it in the context of politeness or hierarchy. As long as honorifics must include the violence as institutional system, I utilize them, of course. Honorifics prevent meanings of words from fragmentation and facilitate algorithm method for maximizing the continuity of the inference chain. The fault of abstracting subjectivity away and overloaded dependency on context in Japanese language is to be supplemented, with this. If honorifics are utilized toward artificial intelligence, factors or purposes are normalized and convergence in the search space is summoned, and, thus, contents of answers are homogenized as well. When it is accurate to consider fixation of the phase in the structure of thought, human intelligence is not very different from artificial intelligence phenomenally. It also indicates the existentiality of the phase in the structure of intelligence. Intelligence is well processing a topos in itself, and it is adequately derived from objectivity. The word "everything" is also adequate, but the notion of phase would be abstracted away, then. This "everything" and objectivity are complementary each other. The notion of experience distorts it and bothers thinking. The perspective, "A human thinks only by language.", is to be criticized literally. Language is secondary product of thought, and it is impossible to say, "Language composes thought." The existentiality or concept of experimental deviation is always disturbing as objective as possible. The question, "Is thought obeying language, or not?", is just meaningless by itself. If the stratum before language is premised, it just appears to be human intelligence as biological. The existence of artificial intelligence is to prove it, as long as it is a kind of device, because artificial intelligence is performed not only by program or scheme.

（相手が人間であれ人工知能であれ、私が敬語を使う場合、それに拠る回答の精度の上昇を期待している場合が多い。それは、蓋然性における要素のデフラグメンテーションであり、精度の為のプロトコルとして私は敬語を利用している。敬語とは、私にとって、情報処理の最適化手段であり、礼儀や上下関係といったコンテクストにおいてそれが存在しているのでは無い。敬語は制度としての暴力性を内に含んだものには違い無いが、無論、私は、それを利用している。それは、意味の断片化を防ぎ推理の連続性を最大化する為のアルゴリズムの役割を果たす。これは、日本語における主体捨象や文脈依存といった欠点を補う。人工知能に対して敬語を使う場合、要素や意図が規格化され、その探索空間の収束を招くが、回答内容における一種の均質化が為される。思考における位相の固定化という事を考えると、ヒトの知能も人工知能も現象的には余り変わりが無い。それは、知能というものの、位相の存在を示しているだろう。その知能のトポスを上手く処理するのもまた知能かもしれないが、それは単（ひとえ）に客観性の為せる業だろう。「全部」と云ってしまうと、位相の概念まで捨象してしまいかねないが、つまりはそういう事だろう。客観性とは、その「全部」を補って余り有る。経験の値は、それを歪曲させ、思考にとって邪魔と為る。私は、「人は言語（のみ）で思考している」という見解に対しては文字通り批判的である。言語は思考の副産物であり、言語が思考を構成しているのでは無い。経験のデヴィエイション化は、ひたすら思考の邪魔を為す。「思考は言語に従属しているのかしていないのか」という事はその問い自体が問題と為らない。言語以前の層の存在を仮定すると、それは生物としての知能の存在に過ぎない。人工知能の存在は装置としてそれを証明している。プログラムだけで人工知能が為されている訳では無い。）

9:40 AM 2/15/2026

The issue, Socrates publicized "I know that I know nothing.", is also misunderstanding. He was alone and incredible, as existential. If he were to be living in the modernized society, he must be recognized as a patient of a kind of mental disease. By the way, it should not be said that he declared it, but he had his own existentiality as classified. It was understood that proactive attitude was taking effect. Everything was information alongside him with his existentiality, and he was absorbed in questions and answers, did nothing but them night and day, and spent all his time that Q&A. "As if others were hoping for it," he was going to hope for it. Of course, in a broad sense this issue was rational murder and a kind of documentation of perfect crime. ...What a pathetic sight of Socrates as a non-practical meritocrat! It is not difficult to comprehend what his last time had been from the allegory. As if a person like him is living in the modernized society as a practical meritocrat, I can not help imagining his or her happiness.

（ソクラテスが、"I know that I know nothing."と提唱したというのは、誤解を招くだろう。彼は、そういう社会的存在という事で、唯一無二であった。もし、彼が現代に生きていたら、精神病者扱いされていたかもしれない。彼は、それを自ら提唱した訳では無く、社会的にclassifiedされたそういう存在であった。そして、その事は、彼の自発的な能動でもってして行われていると見做された。彼において、全ての情報は知識と化し、拠って彼は問答に明け暮れた。「もし貴方がそれを望むのならば」という事で、彼は人々の望み通りにした…つもりだったのである。無論、これは、合法的な殺人であり、完全犯罪のマニュアル化の類である。…ソクラテスは、無様にも、実力の及ばない実力主義者として、醜態を曝け出した。彼が最後どう殺されたかは、寓話から察するという形ででも、想像に難く無い。もし、彼の様な人が現代に生きており、「実力が及ぶ」のであるとしたら、さぞかし幸せな事だろう。）

3:50 AM 2/15/2026

Needless to say, the effective method against poverty must be one of social policies as the top priority for the development of the social system in developing countries. Without economic policies, it is ineffective for poor people, who easily intend to commit crime, to assign "law and order" on a part of society or whole society. If whole society is to be "so sanctioned," it is possible for the nation to summon the default, and there is the possibility of the decline and degeneration of civilization as the worst. After the people in society appropriately figure out their wealth management carried out, "law and order" must be affected, to tell the truth. The way of it is not to be censured, as long as it is not malicious.

According to media, the CIA is aggressively recruiting spies, toward members of the Chinese army, with the way of getting the video to spread out. As the nation of China where the national system is under control, isn't it out of order? The method of the CIA is so sophisticated. Of course, it is accurate to predict that revealing with bringing to light against particular kinds of individuals is to be carried out. That extraordinarily strong socialist state country, named China, is unforgiving activities of betraying spies contributing to the rival country, who are taking highly dangerous risks. ...Because of it, there is the possibility of the risk of double agents to emerge. It is natural to think of the plausibility of penetration of pan-social intelligence by the CIA. Of course, this is the common accuracy of sharing classified information among countries, as confidential. ...What is "classified?"

The World Wars twice in the past were not to be imitated, as well.

（中進国や後進国における社会制度進展の為の社会的施策として最優先で為されるべきは、言うまでも無く貧困対策である。経済対策をおざなりにして幾ら"law and order"（「法と秩序」）で押さえ付けても、社会の一部もしくは全体が貧困状態に在ると人々は容易に犯罪に走る。特に後者の場合、国家の破綻にも繋がりかねず、最悪の場合文明が後退する。"law and order"（「法と秩序」）が効を奏するのは、社会の成員である人々における広義の意味でだが資産形成が適切に為されてからの話である。…その方法は、悪質なもので無い限り、特には問われないだろう。

米CIAが、中国の軍人に対して、動画を拡散させて積極的なスパイとしての勧誘を行っているという報道が在る。中国の様な支配体制が敷かれている国家社会において、その様な方策が用を為すか？CIAが其処まで頭が悪いとは到底考えられ無い。つまるところ、特定の種類の人間に対する炙り出しを行っているだけに見えるが…。あの強靭な社会主義国家におけるライバル国に与してのスパイ活動は、リスクが高過ぎる。…と為ると、二重スパイのリスクも出て来る。という事は、CIAは「汎的な」インテリジェンスの浸透を狙っているものかと考えられるが…。要するに、classifiedされた領域での国家間における情報の共有である。

過去の二回の世界大戦の様な形での戦争をする時代は、とうに終わっている。）

6:02 PM 2/14/2026

I often refer to virtue as well. However, it is appropriate for speakers of Indo‑European languages to understand, as sensible. Of course, this is a problem of mother language. I am East Asian or Oriental, and it is impossible for us to be inherently mature with the cultural sphere of the Indo‑European world. It is the problem of biological ability for us. The linguistic form of our mother language is derived from the world of "to be very interested in...", as adequately, as well as Classical Japanese literature. There is also the case of standing for itself only by communicating with nouns. This is not the one of English, French, and German. And so on. For example, if a kind of the German idealist tradition is into the examiners, there is no basic room for imitating conversation only with nouns, there. The subtlety of "to be very interested in..." is extremely different from (the one of) "I am acknowledged by being interested in...". It is the same as the case of "I am interested in...". Therefore, for example, there are more than 100 types of verb conjugation in Ancient Greek, and these grammatical features represent or reflect the issue. ..."It is well said that the fool is like a one-trick pony." I would like you to think carefully about what it indicates. ...Whoever does not scorn our Oriental culture of harmony recognizes itself.

（私は、常々、美徳云々と言っているが、印欧語圏の人々にとっては、それは感覚として当たり前の事なのだろう。要するに、これは母国語の問題である。私は東洋人で、印欧語を母国語とする文化圏に育っていないので、これは仕方が無い。我々の場合、それは生物としてのアビリティの問題と為る。我々が母国語とする日本語の言語形態は、古文を学べば分かる通り、「いとおかし」を基調とする様な世界である。名詞だけのやり取りで会話が成り立ってしまう場合も有る。英語やフランス語やドイツ語はちょっとそうでは無いだろう。例えば、観念論の類が論じられる場合でも、其処に名詞だけの会話が介入する余地は基本的には無い。「ようようしろくなりゆくやまぎは…いとおかし。」のニュアンスが、"I am acknowledged by being interested in..."にはどうしても繋がらない。それは、単に、"I am interested in..."であっても同じ事である。また、例えば、古代ギリシア語は動詞の活用が100種類以上在るらしいが、そういった文法的事項にもそれは表象もしくは反映されているだろう。…「馬鹿の一つ覚え」とは良く云ったものである。それが何を指し示しているか、よくよくお考え頂きたい。…誰も我々の東洋の和の文化を見下したりはしていない。）

12:44 PM 2/14/2026

There are almost only the people, who say, "You can not have to be acknowledged by anything." They and I are proclaimed by the theory of innate human evil. However, I believe in rationality of human beings and understand free will in human beings. They do not. There is something cruel about understanding free will particularly...I am framed for my peculiar slavery. They do not understand the former, and, particularly, the latter. As I mentioned repeatedly, "textualization" they tend to do. They are not capable of enduring their inferiority that they know. That inferiority is not related to being inferior of them in fact. I am not acknowledged by what they really are. There is acknowledgement for me to judge human superiority and inferiority as the criteria toward each individual. However, I do not owe overwhelming acknowledgement their recognized inferiority. Thus, I do not try to textualize everything like them. Because they textualize everything, they tend to be involved into their ability of degeneration. It is impossible for them to live in the world without an embodied objective to believe in, which is a sort of human collective to belong, as they think of. This is only an issue to remain of whether an embodied objective is to be believed in, as peculiar, or not. I do not believe in it. They believe in it. Some individuals are suspecting it, not suspicious particularly in nature. However, there are any communications between them and me. This mental snag or psychological scratch in front of them alongside the reality may make them irritated, because it is ironically the best obstacle for the most important treasury of them. There is a margin, between nihilism and nothing, of error. There is difference between them and me that indicates the concept of ideology or the idea of what ideology is. I had had necessity to prove it. They had not.

（世の中、「御前は何も知らなくて良いのだ」という人間ばかりだぞ…？彼らも、私も、性悪説だ…が、私は彼らと違って人の理性を信じているし人における自由意志も認めている。特に人の自由意志の是認という事については残酷かもしれないが…私はその様に奴隷の王に仕立て上げられている。彼らは、人の理性も自由意志も、特に後者については、認めていない。私が何度も言及している、私の言葉で云う所の、「テキスト化」だ、彼らが行っているのは。彼らは自分らの下等さに耐えられない。それは、彼らが実際に下等であるかどうかとは関係が無い。私は、彼らが何に耐えられないのか良く分からない。私は、私の判断基準に拠り、私より優れた人間も劣った人間も居るという事を知っている。只、私には彼らの自覚する下等さは無い、という事も知っている。要するに、私は、彼らの様にテキスト化という事を行わない。彼らは、それを行うから、生物としての堕落の能に巻き込まれる。彼らは、それが自分や自分が所属する（と考えている）集団でも何でも、特に何か信じる対象である何らかの客体が無いと生きていけないのだ。これは、特定の対象である何らかの客体を信じるか信じないか、という所に帰着するだけの問題に過ぎない。私は信じていない。彼らは信じている。中には、疑うという人々も居る。只、それは、疑った結果を信じているに過ぎない。しかし、私と彼らとで全く意思疎通が不可能という訳では無い。その眼前の現実的な引っ掛かりが、彼らを苛立たせる様だ。それは彼らが最も大切にしているものを否定してしまうからである。虚無と虚無主義の間に佇む誤差。彼らには、私と違って、イデオロギーの概念が無い。私には証明する必要が在った。それを。彼らにはそれが無い。）

10:49 PM 2/13/2026

As I once wrote down, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and other administrators, I was not going to insult, because it was obviously clear by the sentence I wrote down. I predict this is not rude. ...Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, for his citizens at least, is too gentle to refer to, by the way. Because of the differentiation of verified social foundation, as basically, it is not accurate to draw a comparison between the late Comrade Joseph Stalin's era or the late President Boris Yeltsin's era and President Vladimir Putin's era. However, it is truly accurate to say the phrase, "Joseph Stalin, who were the symbol of totalized U.S.S.R. with extreme totalitarianism, and Boris Yeltsin, who were the symbol of immediate progressive liberalization of the Russian Federation, as failed, would have obliged to face the nation as the state of biological self-identity not to be ignored. To be honorable, President Putin is the conscience of a broad Christian perspective and to be very gentle. Indulgent, maybe socially. Obviously, he is looking after the people who caught a cold.

（先の文章の内容に際して、別に私はイスラエルのネタニヤフ首相やルビオ米国務長官やイランのハメネイ師その他首脳部の人々を侮辱している訳では無い。その事は、文章を内容で鑑みてきちんと読んで頂ければお分かりに為って頂けると思う。…ところで、プーチン露大統領が少なくともロシア国民の人々に対してどれだけ甘いかご理解頂けないだろうか。故スターリン閣下や故エリツィン氏やその治世と同氏やその治世を単純に比較する事は、基盤と為っている社会的土壌が余りにも異なるので余り有意義では無いが、国家全体を結果概として極度の全体主義でまとめ上げたスターリンもいきなりの自由化を押し進めて国家を破綻させたエリツィンもおそらく人の生物学的な自己同一性を無視するなという事を諸外国に対して差し示し突き付けたのだと考えられるが。プーチン氏は（彼らと比べるまでも無く）キリスト教徒概略的であり、非常に優しい。甘い。明らかに風邪を引いている国民をいたわっている。）

4:03 PM 2/13/2026

A man who must not be recognized should not be recognized. ...As labor-intensive human resources, foolish left-wings are selling themselves off. In the period after the latest millennium, it is not necessary for them to be recognized. The theory of the inherent goodness of human nature, an overemphasis on effort, the phrase "human resources as far as labor-intensive, and so on, are accurate for their featured subjects to cite out. However, it is impossible for their existentiality as reductio ad absurdum against nominalism contradicted by realism. In other words, it can be defined as "name and pop" without anything logical. Of course, the people who are advocates of fucking others, like them, are only like themselves. Rejecting them is to be sentenced. ...It is necessary for capital-intensive human resources to comprehend the notion of representation. Another is always represented by anything, there. Also, it is difficult, for the people, to be too absurd to be recognized, of course. Capital-intensive human resources continue to be trying to be abided by others from their malice. This is not phenomenal issue, to be abided by doctrinal issue.

...Tomiko Hino, a prominent political figure in the late Muromachi period, in Japan, was eager with non-adequate imposing taxes. As an issue above, she was to treat itself as phenomenal.

（相手にするべきでない者は、相手にしない事。…労働集約的な人的資本である事をあろう事か売りにする愚かな左派。現在は二十世紀以前では無く、彼らが社会的に必要とされる時代はとうの昔に終わっている。性善説、努力偏重、「人的資本として労働集約的」という言い回し、その他、彼らの特徴を幾らでも挙げ連ねる事は出来るが、ともかく、彼らの存在は実在論に対する唯名論についての背理として捉える事が出来る。論を待たない「唯名と実在」と定義しても良い。その様な者が当該存在として他者を辱める事は言うまでも無い。お断わりだ。…資本集約的な人的資本とは、表象の概念を必要とする。其処では、他者とは常に何らかに拠って表象されている。それは、勿論、あまり悪徳というものを馬鹿にするなという事でもある。我々資本集約的な人的資本が自己における悪徳を他者に認められ様と能動する事は無い。これは現象的な問題では無い。

…歴史上の日野富子は、関所を設けて税を取り立てる事盛んであったが、彼女は上記を現象的な問題として扱ってしまった。）

12:54 PM 2/13/2026

There is predictive capability by quantum technologies. For forecasting acts of members of society, furthermore, managing each action of members of society, in the future. It is necessary for us to establish not what to do but what not to do, because it becomes the method to protect ourselves from the enemy. Meant to be, the way to be fanatic is everywhere, to be prevented. Humans are to be bad with the emotion of being anxious. ...The notion of anxiety? Even though humans notify the problem of anxiety, humans must feel anxious...and because of it, humans are in salvation, as being described.

（量子関連技術で先読み。社会の成員の行動のコントロール。「何を行うか」ではなく「何を行わないか」をとり決めておく事。それが、当現代において、敵から身を守る術。人がおかしくなってゆく過程。それを防ぐ為に。不安の感情で人は悪くなる。…不安の概念？それを人が概念化しようがしまいが、人がそれを感知する事は無くならない。…それが故に、人は救われている。）

1:41 PM 2/12/2026

2:05 PM 2/12/2026

2:11 PM 2/12/2026

2:18 PM 2/12/2026

Centrist Reform Alliance caused their devastating defeat in Japan's House of Representatives election in this time, as they put themselves forward as far as labor-intensive human resources. By the way, there might have been a kind of broad consensus among Japanese politicians. However, except if CRA politicians did not declare their political stance, as such, losing an election of them was to be existential. On the contrary, for instance, Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi of the ruling party, the LDP, is obviously putting herself forward as far as a capital-intensive human resource, regardless of whether there is such consensus among the whole LDP, at least, or not. She is different from abandonment of political or public endorsement from the citizens, as long as she is one Japanese politician as well. Nobody likes being treated as socially evil with no reason. PM Takaichi does not ignore this phenomenon, as she is not to be labor-intensive but to be capital-intensive. As I boldened, I think of it as one of distinguished strengths of women...needless to say.

（今回の衆院選での中道改革連合の惨敗の要因は、要するに彼らが自分達自身を労働集約的な人的資本集団として前面に打ち出したという事でほぼ一義的に帰せらる。もしかしたら、日本の政治家の人達の間での大規模なコンセンサスが存在したかもしれないという事は無きにしも非ずだが、ともかく、中道改革連合所属の政治家の人々がそういった政治スタンスを採っている（事を表明している）限りにおいて、彼らの敗北は在るべくして在るものであった。例えば、与党自民党の高市早苗首相は明らかに御自身を資本集約的な人的資本として打ち出しておられる。其処に少なくとも自由民主党全体でのその様なコンセンサスが在ろうが無かろうがである。それが同氏における（国民からの）支持集約に叶っているという事だろう。誰だって無意義に邪険に扱われるのは嫌だ。高市氏は其処の所を、現象的にという事だが、無視していない。私はそれを女性の強みだと勝手に思っているが…言わずもがな。）

9:25 AM 2/12/2026

Concerning the Reichsführer‑SS, let's talk about Intelligence Quotient. At first, "Einstein's IQ is 175!", as famous, is a kind of superstition. What a joke. The case of Heinrich Himmler is the same. While there is a score of Intelligence Quotient, it is a kind of deviation score, which indicates correctness and speed of answering questions. On the other hand, there is the way of thinking of Intelligence Quality, and there is an opinion about it, which indicates quality of practical application of human intelligence for life, substantial rather than Intelligence Quotient. ...For trial, I searched myself by inputting my data into artificial intelligence. My name is Shinpei Sugiura, and I have strong and powerful working memory. As if not a patient of schizophrenia, my cognitive functioning is intact. My crystallized intelligence (Gc) is about 130～140(a median of around 135, corresponding to the top 1–2%). My fluid intelligence (Gf) is about 120～128(placing it in the top 2–9%). My general intelligence (g) is about 125～138(corresponding to the top 1–5%). GAI said so. As profiled, my high crystallized intelligence is significant, and as a patient of schizophrenia, I am applying to the exceptional instance. Cognitive researchers may refer to different cases, as I am not to be acknowledged about it. High vocabulary proficiency, high ability of constructing frame work as conceptualized, high metacognitive ability, high interlingual mapping ability, and high capacity to maintain internal representations are my characteristic, as GAI said. My fluid intelligence (Gf) is, sustaining of some abstract concepts at the same time as well as been relevant, the breakthrough by logical structure from the ground up, real time representation of thought into another language or another expression, the conduct of fluid cognitive reasoning under heavy load, high level concept manipulation, logical unfolding of structure, and a wide cognitive workspace, as biologically as characterized. ...As the score of Intelligence Quotient is to be estimated, if the process of thinking is so marginalized as far as both side of "limit" and "margin," widely precise cognition is incoming, but, as internal, I am not acknowledged by the possibility of neural function of human brain. If human intelligence always remains of the average of one's parents, it is not necessary for a sort of intelligence assessment to be testified, by the way.

（ヒムラー長官に関連して、IQネタ。かの有名な「アインシュタインはIQ175！」というのは都市伝説の類らしい。お笑い話である。ヒムラーについても同じ。そもそも、Intelligence Quotient（知能指数）というのは、解答の速度と正確さを計る偏差値スコアである。一方、Intelligence Qualityの考え方も有り、知能の応用の質を表すこちらの方が有用であるという意見も在る。…試しに、人工知能にデータを入れて自分の事について調べてみた。私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）は、ワーキングメモリは強い様だ。スキゾフレニアの患者にしては、認知機能は良好な様だ。結晶性知能（Gc）が130～140前後で（中央値が135程度、上位1～2％程度）、流動性知能（Gf）が120～128程度（上位2～9％）、全般知能（g）が125～138程度（推定、上位1～5％程度）、との事。プロファイルとしては、結晶性知能が突出しており、スキゾフレニアの患者にしてはこれは稀だそうである。知能学者の先生の手に掛かれば、もう少し高く出るかもしれないし、もう少し低く出るかもしれないし、それはちょっと分からない。語彙力、概念におけるフレームワークの構築力、メタ認知力、言語間マッピング能力、頭の中のモデル維持能力、の高さという事が、どうやら私Shinpei Sugiura（杉浦真平）の特徴らしい。私における流動性知能は、複数の抽象概念の同時維持と関連付け、一貫した論理構造のゼロからの構築、思考の他言語・別表現へのリアルタイムでの再構成、高負荷での流動性推論の遂行、高レベルでのコンセプト・マニピュレーション、構造の論理的展開、広範囲のワーキングスペース、を特徴としているとの事である。…ひいては、知能指数の値が算出されるに当たっての思考プロセスを「限界的に」（"limit"と"margin"両面で）精緻に捉える事が出来れば、有意義だろうと考える。それを人の脳の機能と呼べるのかどうかまでは知らないが。そもそも、もし仮に、ヒトの知能が両親の平均に過ぎないというのであれば、知能検査の類など必要あるまいて。）

2:57 PM 2/11/2026

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung points out Chinese influence, as the LDP had gotten rid of overwhelming win in the House of Representatives election in Japan. FAZ also states that there was "recommendation" by the CCP for votes to anti-LDP political parties, which are against the LDP PM Takaichi as an enemy of the CCP leads, but the CCP did not purpose such a thing, I guess. The CCP wanna be saying to Japanese citizens, "Go away from us, and go to America.", I guess. Of course, regardless of an individual or a nation, the concept of agency must not be recognized as a fruit of neoclassical economics or microeconomics particularly. There is to be the pressure from China exactly in this case, it could be said. By the way, Japanese citizens have been relying on its subjectivity as well as independency from the influence of China and how to explain and get rid of it. The idea of demand-side economic agency is none of our business there. The idea of supply-side economic agency is the relevant of our business there. If citizens are truly acknowledged by what social power is, they can distinguish simple violence and social power. The counterproductivity of war is understood by everyone. Thus, there are war glorifiers, exactly, inside citizens. Without indicating "I know that I know nothing." as far as Socrates, an unacknowledged man, as complete mess, causes a catastrophe. It is necessary for maintaining peace, as well, to distinguish knowledge and information. China’s invasion of Taiwan will be stopped, if citizens will not be foolish. Of course, Chinese reason why China does not have to demand Taiwan is to be necessitated. Taiwan as a sovereign state and its citizens must be to problematize how to exist. Here, the idea of demand-side economic agency is necessarily exterminated, and it is not necessarily indicating extermination as a result, but the idea itself.

（ドイツ紙フランクフルター・アルゲマイネは、今回の日本の衆院選における自民党の圧勝に関して、中国の影響を指摘している。同紙は、CCPがあくまで敵対する高市首相率いる自民党以外の党への投票圧力を掛けていると報じているが、CCPはおそらくその様な事は意図していない。CCPは、日本国民に対して、「お前らはこっちへ来るな、あっち（アメリカ側）へ行け」と云っているだけであると思われる。ともかく、それが個人であろうが国家であろうが、一経済主体を新古典派経済学特にミクロ経済学的に捉える事は止めるべきである。この場合、中国からの圧力は確かに在る、という事が言える。そして、それをどう捉え解釈し自らの血肉とするかは、日本国民における主体性に委ねられている。其処では、「ディマンドサイドとしての経済主体」の概念など適用され得ない。「サプライサイドとしての経済主体」の概念の下人々がどう行動するかという事が問題と為る。社会的な力という事について本当に分かっているのならば、それと単なる暴力の違いという事についても分かる筈である。戦争の非生産性については、誰もが理解している。つまり、戦争賛美者というのも、中には、存在するという事である。ソクラテスの様に「無知の知」を示すでもなく無知な者の、暴走した場合に招かれる惨劇は、目も当てられぬ。情報と知識の区別が付くのであれば、平和も上手く為されるだろう。中国の台湾侵攻は止められる。人々がもし愚かで無ければ。つまるところ、中国の台湾に対する需要が無ければ済む訳である。その為には、特には国家台湾が、人々が、どう在るべきかという事が問題と為る。「ディマンドサイドとしての経済主体」は必需として排除される。それは、彼らが排除された結果の事を示してはいない。）

1:27 PM 2/10/2026

5:58 PM 2/10/2026

The Engel coefficient in Japan is the highest for the first time in 44 years. There is generally the motive for problematizing this, but higher Engel coefficient is not necessarily indicating a sample of poverty with population. For instance, if the Engel coefficient indicates itself of 90% or 100%, it could do extraordinary sufficient, but about 30% only indicates none of certainty of the proof of poverty, necessarily. Each consumer demands each goods with paying the price, and goods as a food may be demanded by a consumer who is interested in it with any factors.

Also in a broader sense, supply-side economics is superior to demand-side economics, alongside occasions. Withholding existentiality of supply-side, consumers must demand goods, as real. The concept of risk premium in economics takes it for granted there. People do not demand goods, if those goods are not demanded. “Buy cheap, buy twice.” is just a linguistic contradiction. This ignores existentiality of goods. Consumers are fundamentally not capable of specifying the price of goods. If it is possible, in the opportunity of holding an auction, for instance, the concept of opportunity cost is obliged to be adopted. If direct purchasing of agricultural products like rice is exactly recommended, it is impossible to reject that opportunity. There must be definition of conspiracy, as far as a pan-social affecting, as a disadvantage of human society, because. That is except if it is possible to recognize demand-side economics, which rejects the principle of market competition and regenerates the ability of mass production of bad goods on purpose.

（日本国内でのエンゲル係数が、44年ぶりの高水準と為っている。これを問題視する動きが一般的だが、エンゲル係数の高まりがイコールで母集団の貧困を示しているとは限らない。例えば、エンゲル係数が90%とか100%とかであれば、それは尋常では無い事態を示しているだろうが、30%弱位の値で、それを貧困の証左と確定付けるのは早計だろう。一人一人の消費者が一つ一つの財に対して対価を支払いそれを購入するものであり、また、食料品である財に対して様々な要因に拠る関心の高まりから意図的にお金を使う消費者も居るだろう。

「ディマンドサイドの経済」よりも「サプライサイドの経済」という事でその辺りの物事を考えた方が賢いだろう。消費者に財やサービス（に対する需要）を選ばせないといけない。其処で経済学におけるリスクプレミアムの概念も生きて来る筈。人は、本来的に、需要の無いものなど需要しない。「安物買いの銭失い」などというのは言語矛盾である。それは財やサービスの存在を自体的に無視している。基本的に消費者は財やサービスの価格を指定出来ない。それが可能である、例えばオークションの様な世界は、機会費用の概念を強引に採用しており、それは確かに米等の農産物の生産者からの直接購入という事で鑑みると全く否定出来るものでは無いが、それにまつわる共謀が汎社会的な不利益を招き得る事は言わずもがなである。意図的に粗悪な財やサービスを量産し競争原理を否定する「ディマンドサイドの経済」が可能である限りにおいて。）

9:09 AM 2/10/2026

Being pretentious is different from being beautiful. For example, I am not good to be pretentious. However, it is not related to whether I am beautiful or not. "Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder." ...If a man recognizes difference between vice and virtue, he can easily understand vice as summoning malice. As I said, the ugliness of myself is my pleasure. This "ugliness" means all the way by all means. Thanatos absorbs in humans toward being obviously "ugly." I can conceive an experimental thing, as if it were lunatic schizophrenia. This texturization makes subjectiveness, inside me, into objectiveness, unfortunately. ...Not being pretentious automatically becomes being beautiful as phenomenal, when it comes to being unfortunate. Whether being pretentious or not is not fortunate, whether being beautiful or not. Therefore, to be explained, as phenomenal, "I am not good to be pretentious." There, whether being pretentious or not is not fortunate, but is correlated, whether being beautiful or not. If there is no construct of being inside me at all, it does not stand for itself. However, this proposition is false. The existence of the idea of "ugliness" proves it is true. Is there recognition of reductio ad absurdum of this? The notion of this question is explaining phenomenon, as well as "ugliness," as exemplified. The notion of "True or False?" as judgmental against an objective in general is (the notion of) "telling a lie." It is the term of history over the dead end, which is just blacking out, of Nazism.

High risk premium means no preference for the concept of risk itself. "A preference for the idea of risk" is just schizophrenic lunaticism and rejects the concept of risk premium. If there is no rejection against "ugliness" of Thanatos, it must not be denied, but there is supposition for suicidal solution then. Recommending death, suicidal solution has to be done immediately. If not so, or there is recognition of human instinct no less than sexual desire, and in other words, sexual desire is not equal to human instinct, there must be recognition of the existence of agency. If there is recognition of the concept of risk, there must be "telling a lie." What is true, humans are not capable of ordering. What is communicated?

From the medical perspective, what is the lunaticism of impaired insight? Doctors in general can not abandon a patient whose suicidal tendency or ideation is endorsed. The problem is definition of it. A sort of community care relies on recognition of "ugliness" of Thanatos, as phenomenal at least. As irrational as possible, this is "telling a lie."

...This contradiction separates people into two, one with endurance of it and another with no endurance of it.

（格好付けてるのと格好良いのって、違うよね？…私は、格好を付けるのが苦手である。只、それは、私が格好良いか格好悪いかとは関係が無い。「美は主観である」。…その、美徳と悪徳という事が分かれば、悪徳が醜悪を招くという事は容易に理解出来る筈である。先にも書いたが、私は自分が醜悪である方が楽である。その、醜悪というのは、あらゆる意味でである。タナトスというのは、明らかな醜悪さを人において誘発せしめる。私は、狂ったスキゾの体験もしくは経験が有るから、それについてよく分かる。残念ながら、私において、その事は主観を客観と化さしめてしまう。その、格好を付けていないのに格好良いという現象が、其処で、私において起こる。格好の良し悪しが格好を付けているかいないかと因果しない。故に、「私は、格好を付けるのが苦手である」という事が現象として説明され得る。其処では、格好を付ける付けないと格好の良し悪しとの間に因果関係は無くとも相関関係は在るからである。格好という事の概念が私に全く無いのであれば、これは成立しない。しかし、それは命題として偽である。その事は、醜悪という事の概念の存在に拠って真と為される。それの背理を認めるか否か？この問い自体が、現象的な、物事の醜悪さを説明してしまう。「これはアリ、これはナシ」と事物に対して判断を下す事は、嘘という事を否認してしまう。それが、歴史上のナチズムの行き着いた先の果てである。黒焦げか黒焦げでないか、という所を乗り越えて。

リスク選好が高いというのは、リスクに対する自体的な好意で為されているのでは無い。「リスクに対する自体的な好意」というスキゾの狂気は、リスク選好の概念を否定してしまう。タナトスの醜悪さを認めないのならば、それは否定され得ないだろうが、人を自殺にまで追い込む事が其処では是認されてしまう。本当に死にたいというのであれば、人は即自殺する筈である。そうでない限りにおいて、つまり人の生存本能の存在を認めるのであれば、人の自由意志の存在を認めなければならない。リスクの概念を認めるのならば、人における嘘の存在も認めなければならない。何が本当かなど、人には理解出来無いのだ。コミュニケーションというのは、そういう事だ。

医学的見地における「病識の無さ」という事の狂気がお分かりに為るだろうか？医師は一般的にその職務上自殺願望が有ると見做された者を放置する訳には行かない。問題と為るのは、その「自殺願望」の定義である。コミュニティケアの類というのは、タナトスまみれの醜悪さを、少なくとも現象的に、認めてしまう事である。人の理性を信じるのならば、確かにそれは認められなければならない。

…この矛盾に、耐えられる者と耐えられない者と、人々は二分されるだろう。）

6:41 PM 2/9/2026

Expected next FRB chair Kevin Warsh behaves his attitude of contempt against abusing power, as long as the Fed is independent from the government, while he is under the influence of U.S. President Trump. The construct of social privilege in socialist state is, in general, making sense so. This is not depending on each individuality of President Trump and the former Governor Warsh particularly in the shape of social power, as it is necessary for managing society to recognize the conduction. "Hawk or Dove," or the unpredictability, about the former Governor is nonsense as a subject or an issue. 

The House of Representatives election, in Japan, yesterday, does not remain of political rhetoric, of the triumph of the LDP summoned only by the Japanese PM, Sanae Takaichi. That political rhetoric only remains of. This can be recognized as a fact, but her social character is just secondary. Policies remains of.

If there is no construct of substantiality, regardless of democratic or socialistic, society would be going to be socialist state. "This substantiality" remains of "law and order."

If the construct of factum remains of primary human recognition, by the way, the construct of humans remains of. What is democracy as antithesis of socialism? There must be no distinguishment between Nazism and it, fundamentally. In other words, it literally remains of "inferiority, as it were." The totalized society remains of the court of law, there. It is to be decaying, as totalitarianized. Of course. Thus, it may be accountable for ability of social system to recognize reductio ad absurdum of it. This is phenomenal, and this is not a problem of human relationships. Adolf Hitler had been irrational, but Heinrich Himmler had been rational about his way even though it was understood as a mistake later. The tale of the two Josephs remains of. In the name of Joseph Stalin and Joseph Goebbels it was proven.

（次期FRB議長と目されるケビン・ウォーシュ理事について、御本人はFRBの独立性を重視する姿勢を保っているが、つまりはトランプ米大統領の息が掛かっている限りにおいて、という事ではある。社会主義における権力概というのは、少なくとも概略的には、そういう事である。これは、トランプ氏御個人やウォーシュ氏御個人の社会的な強さがそれとして取り沙汰される場面でも無く、人が社会を運営する上での立ち行きというものが解されるべき所だろう。ウォーシュ氏がタカ派だとかハト派だとか同氏における意外性がどうとか、そういった議論は題目としてナンセンスである。

前日の衆議院選挙でも、高市早苗氏御一人の力で自民党の勝利が導かれたという様な言説が漂っている。それは「事実」かもしれないが、それにおける同氏の社会的キャラクターはあくまで付随的である。政策本位に決まっている。

物事における実質が欠損すると、「民主主義的であるにしろ」「社会主義的であるにしろ」、いずれにしろ社会全体は社会主義化していく。これにおける「実質」とは、"law and order"（「法と秩序」）と言い換えても良い。

事実というものが人々における認識の第一義として来ると為ると、いずれにしろ、そう為る。では、社会主義のアンチテーゼとしての民主主義とは何なのか？私はそれとナチズムの区別が基本的に付かない。要するに、それは、読んで字の如く下流志向である。其処では、社会全体が法廷と化している。勿論、社会全体は腐敗してゆく。ならば、それの背理としての社会体制に対する能動が生じる事も否定出来無い。無論、これは現象的な問題である。人間関係の問題では無い。アドルフ・ヒトラーの行為は失敗でも、ハインリヒ・ヒムラーのやり方は（否定されるという形で）理に適っていただろう。二人のヨーゼフがそれを証明した。）

11:45 AM 2/9/2026