Spring is here, and new life is coming in. Japanese elite private universities, Waseda, Keio, or Sophia, for example, intend to differentiate themselves with their traditional highly qualified education in English. However, it may cause lower substantiality of education as such, in private universities, rather than in national institutes. For instance, people who grew up overseas already have highly potentialized language abilities, and paradoxically, they can take for themselves granted or achieve high performance particularly in national institutes. Human society does not accept those who are obsessed by the relevant of one's academic background. Elite private universities are only contributing to strengthening one's previous social abilities with low efficiency, in that sense, and are not contributing to strengthening one's weak point as substantial. Universities and institutes are to be facilitated as educational, to learn something, and if you do not have the opportunities for studying, you do not have to be recommended to enter and graduate. Social characterization of each individual is none of our business, of human society.
（春という事で、新生活にまつわる話でも。日本の私立大学の最難関層の早慶上智辺りは、伝統的に英語教育で国立大学と差別化を図っている傾向が在るが、後者に比べて前者は教育の実質度合いが低下するという懸念はそもそもの問題として在る。例えば、帰国子女の人達は、既に高度な語学力を有しており、逆説的に国立大学へ入学して勉強した方がパフォーマンスが高いと考えられる。実社会へ出て学歴の肩書だけで通用する訳では無いだろう。最難関私立へ入っても、既に強化されている能力を低パフォーマンスで底上げするだけで、弱点を補強して自己の能力の質を高める事には余り繋がりづらいのではないかと考えられる。大学は教育機関であり、勉強する為に行く所なので、勉強する気が無いのだったら行かない方がマシですよ。社会的キャラ立てで実社会が運営されている訳では無いので。）
3:55 PM 3/18/2026