memo221

There is a way to resist as self-deprecating as the weak. It is different from the death penalty imposed on the leader of the defeated side at the post-war settlement. In the same sense, a self-justifying explanation is none of one's business. It is a work of a man as a judicial problem. Weaknesses generally belong to all of something to texturize, while contemporaneous comprehension of the world, as mechanical, attributes the extreme shape of it. If there is subjectivity about that man, he could understand the given death just as the texturization there. The concept of "assassination," including committing suicide, is the fruit of the weaponry of the law. As Socrates said, "To know that you know nothing," it is too objective to ignore. There is awareness of knowledge of one's own ignorance, hopefully with him.

（弱者における自虐という抵抗手段。それは、戦後処理において敗戦国の将が死罪に処されるのとも訳が違う。同じ意味で、自己正当化の弁明すら何ら役には立たない。それは、人における、法廷における仕事である。弱さとは、慨して全てをテキスト化するものだが、世界をメカニカルに解明した気に為るのはそれの極致である。人から主体性が失われていないのならば、其処で与えられる死が単なるテキストである事を人は理解するだろう。自死も含めた「殺害」の概念は、法を武器化する事の産物だが、「無知の知」という言から学ぶ事はあまりにも多い。「無知の知の知」。）

2:30 PM 9/16/2025




The over-spec thing overthrown by the verisimilitude of the self absolutely causes a failure. Generally, in the context of statistics, there is a positive correlation between high intelligence and the amount of knowledge. In fact, intellectual capacity or cognitive ability is different from the amount of knowledge. Even if one knows something, it does not necessarily mean that the same one becomes wise. Thus, what is the wisdom of human beings? First language competence may be the most performative reflection of it. After all, humans become insane if they lose the verisimilitude of the self correlating with the recognition of the world. The actions of a foolish person substantively recognize themselves as crazy. It remains a versatile reason. As well as "mentally ill" or "anti-social," it advocates for themselves as labeled, once I explained.