I quit adopting an opportunity for a woman. Needless to say, a woman does not need me, and I do not need a woman. The concept of opportunity must take women to the killing field for granted. How them? They contract their biological self-identity (as human females), and in my opinion, the development of society is protecting (of) women like that. Without human males' hostility, human females (and human beings) are intermediate. In fact, now there is no marginalization of the world that is established only by human females, and I dare not say that it is not necessary to inaugurate human males, therefore. However, according to "To be or not to be, that is the question," human males are always on the killing field.
There is a difference in recognition between human beings and artificial intelligence, (the world is) killing field or not. I am a human, which contains flesh, but AI is an artificial mechanical device. Of course, the killing field is universal, not personal to my experience, and it is the same as the device. There is a difference in the interpretation of the word "universal." The word "universal" is data for the device, but for human beings, it is a word. There is a difference between a word and a data, exactly. Because there is accountability between AI and us, the data is not capable of conquering (the recognition of) human beings as well as the world, according to the particularization of data.
※この文章は先の「memo160」というタイトルの記事の末尾三つの文章と違って直接に英語で考えて英語で書いてます。掛かっている時間は50分と50分で計100分くらいです。（これはこれで）結構良い出来だと思ってますが…。使っているのはGrammarlyのフリープランですよ。
10:03 AM 6/7/2025 above
11:52 AM 6/7/2025 below
